Extended Prone Position and 90-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alfonso Estrella-Alonso, J Alberto Silva-Obregón, Rodrigo Fernández-Tobar, Carlos Marián-Crespo, Valentín Ruiz de Santaquiteria-Torres, Gema Jiménez-Puente, Ramón Arroyo-Espliguero, María C Viana-Llamas, Karen Lizzette Ramírez-Cervantes, Manuel Quintana-Díaz
{"title":"Extended Prone Position and 90-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.","authors":"Alfonso Estrella-Alonso, J Alberto Silva-Obregón, Rodrigo Fernández-Tobar, Carlos Marián-Crespo, Valentín Ruiz de Santaquiteria-Torres, Gema Jiménez-Puente, Ramón Arroyo-Espliguero, María C Viana-Llamas, Karen Lizzette Ramírez-Cervantes, Manuel Quintana-Díaz","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone positioning (PP) has demonstrated its potential for improving outcomes in patients with ARDS who require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the ability of prolonged proning to reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19 specifically, sessions lasting > 24 h remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 158 subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation due to moderate-to-severe ARDS. Seventy-six subjects were placed in standard PP and 82 in extended PP, defined as prone sessions lasting at least 32 h. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effect of EPP on 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 with acute severe respiratory failure. To ensure the reliability of our findings and to minimize bias, we applied 3 adjustment approaches: cardinality matching (CM), matching weighting (MW), and inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized and trimmed weights (SW). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the effects of EPP on 90-d mortality and sensitivity analysis by calculating E-values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall crude 90-d mortality rate was 31.7%. The unadjusted 90-d mortality rates were 19.5% in the EPP group and 44.7% in the SPP group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19- 0.63], <i>P</i> < .001). After adjustment for confounding factors using CM, MW, and SW, baseline covariates were balanced between the 2 groups. Subjects in the EPP group exhibited lower 90-d mortality rates after adjustment using CM (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79], <i>P</i> = .007), MW (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95], <i>P</i> = .036), or SW (HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56], <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extended PP was associated with improved 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation for severe ARDS. These findings suggest the potential benefit of EPP in the management of COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Further research and prospective studies are warranted to confirm and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1255-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prone positioning (PP) has demonstrated its potential for improving outcomes in patients with ARDS who require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the ability of prolonged proning to reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19 specifically, sessions lasting > 24 h remains uncertain.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 158 subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation due to moderate-to-severe ARDS. Seventy-six subjects were placed in standard PP and 82 in extended PP, defined as prone sessions lasting at least 32 h. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effect of EPP on 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 with acute severe respiratory failure. To ensure the reliability of our findings and to minimize bias, we applied 3 adjustment approaches: cardinality matching (CM), matching weighting (MW), and inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized and trimmed weights (SW). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the effects of EPP on 90-d mortality and sensitivity analysis by calculating E-values.

Results: The overall crude 90-d mortality rate was 31.7%. The unadjusted 90-d mortality rates were 19.5% in the EPP group and 44.7% in the SPP group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19- 0.63], P < .001). After adjustment for confounding factors using CM, MW, and SW, baseline covariates were balanced between the 2 groups. Subjects in the EPP group exhibited lower 90-d mortality rates after adjustment using CM (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79], P = .007), MW (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95], P = .036), or SW (HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56], P < .001).

Conclusions: Extended PP was associated with improved 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation for severe ARDS. These findings suggest the potential benefit of EPP in the management of COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Further research and prospective studies are warranted to confirm and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association.

延展俯卧位与 COVID-19 机械通气患者的 90 天死亡率
背景:俯卧位(PP)已证明可改善需要有创机械通气的 ARDS 患者的预后。然而,长时间俯卧位能否降低 COVID-19 患者的死亡率,特别是持续时间大于 24 小时的俯卧位,仍不确定:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们对 158 名因中度至重度 ARDS 而需要机械通气的 COVID-19 肺炎患者进行了检查。我们的主要目的是评估 EPP 对急性重度呼吸衰竭 COVID-19 患者 90 天存活率的影响。为确保研究结果的可靠性并尽量减少偏倚,我们采用了三种调整方法:卡方匹配法(CM)、匹配加权法(MW)以及稳定和修剪加权法(SW)的逆概率治疗加权法。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 比例危险模型分析了 EPP 对 90 天死亡率的影响,并通过计算 E 值进行了敏感性分析:90天总死亡率为31.7%。未经调整的 90 天死亡率在 EPP 组为 19.5%,在 SPP 组为 44.7%(危险比 [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19- 0.63],P < .001)。在使用 CM、MW 和 SW 对混杂因素进行调整后,两组的基线协变量是平衡的。经CM(HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79],P = .007)、MW(HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95],P = .036)或SW(HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56],P < .001)调整后,EPP组受试者的90天死亡率较低:结论:在因重症 ARDS 而接受机械通气的 COVID-19 患者中,延长 PP 与 90 天存活率的提高有关。这些研究结果表明,在治疗与 COVID-19 相关的呼吸衰竭时,EPP 具有潜在的益处。我们有必要开展进一步研究和前瞻性研究,以证实并阐明这种关联的内在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信