A Pediatric Bench Model of Continuous Albuterol Delivery Using Heliox.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jie Li, Raghad R Abulkhair, Fai A Albuainain
{"title":"A Pediatric Bench Model of Continuous Albuterol Delivery Using Heliox.","authors":"Jie Li, Raghad R Abulkhair, Fai A Albuainain","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal setup for continuously administering albuterol with heliox remains unclear, especially for pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of continuous albuterol delivery with heliox using different nebulizer setups in a pediatric model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pediatric manikin with simulated spontaneous breathing was used to receive continuous albuterol (20 mg/h) with heliox (80/20) in 3 setups: (1) The MiniHEART nebulizer, driven by oxygen at 3 L/min, was attached to a Y-piece, linking to a non-rebreather mask and a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox; (2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) placed at the humidifier inlet of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with 11 L/min heliox and the manikin's mouth sealed; and (3) a VMN placed between a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox and a non-rebreather mask. Both tight-fitting and loose-fitting mask configurations were tested in the setup with vibrating mesh nebulizer and mask. Heliox of 70/30 was tested with a VMN and a loose-fitting mask. Albuterol was delivered continuously to the nebulizer via an infusion pump at 8 mL (20 mg)/h for each 20-min run and each experiment was repeated five times. A collecting filter placed between the manikin's trachea and lung model was removed after each run, and the drug was eluted and assayed via ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During continuous albuterol nebulization using heliox, the VMN either in line with HFNC or with a tight-fitting mask achieved the highest and similar inhaled dose (8.5 ± 0.4 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, <i>P</i> = .35), while the MiniHEART nebulizer yielded the lowest aerosol deposition (1.5 ± 0.2%). The inhaled dose was lower with the loose-fitting mask than with the tight-fitting mask (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, <i>P</i> =.009), and heliox of 80/20 delivered a higher inhaled dose than heliox of 70/30 (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 0.4%, <i>P</i> = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When administering continuous albuterol with heliox in a pediatric model, utilizing a VMN in line with HFNC during closed-mouth breathing yielded a higher inhaled dose compared to both the MiniHEART nebulizer and VMN with a loose-fitting mask.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1517-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal setup for continuously administering albuterol with heliox remains unclear, especially for pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of continuous albuterol delivery with heliox using different nebulizer setups in a pediatric model.

Methods: A pediatric manikin with simulated spontaneous breathing was used to receive continuous albuterol (20 mg/h) with heliox (80/20) in 3 setups: (1) The MiniHEART nebulizer, driven by oxygen at 3 L/min, was attached to a Y-piece, linking to a non-rebreather mask and a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox; (2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) placed at the humidifier inlet of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with 11 L/min heliox and the manikin's mouth sealed; and (3) a VMN placed between a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox and a non-rebreather mask. Both tight-fitting and loose-fitting mask configurations were tested in the setup with vibrating mesh nebulizer and mask. Heliox of 70/30 was tested with a VMN and a loose-fitting mask. Albuterol was delivered continuously to the nebulizer via an infusion pump at 8 mL (20 mg)/h for each 20-min run and each experiment was repeated five times. A collecting filter placed between the manikin's trachea and lung model was removed after each run, and the drug was eluted and assayed via ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm).

Results: During continuous albuterol nebulization using heliox, the VMN either in line with HFNC or with a tight-fitting mask achieved the highest and similar inhaled dose (8.5 ± 0.4 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, P = .35), while the MiniHEART nebulizer yielded the lowest aerosol deposition (1.5 ± 0.2%). The inhaled dose was lower with the loose-fitting mask than with the tight-fitting mask (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, P =.009), and heliox of 80/20 delivered a higher inhaled dose than heliox of 70/30 (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 0.4%, P = .009).

Conclusions: When administering continuous albuterol with heliox in a pediatric model, utilizing a VMN in line with HFNC during closed-mouth breathing yielded a higher inhaled dose compared to both the MiniHEART nebulizer and VMN with a loose-fitting mask.

使用 Heliox 连续输送阿布特罗的儿科工作台模型。
背景:使用氦氧饱和度连续给药阿布特罗的最佳设置仍不明确,尤其是对于儿科患者。本研究旨在评估在儿科模型中使用不同的雾化器设置,用氦氧饱和度持续给药阿布特罗的效率:方法:使用一个模拟自主呼吸的儿科人体模型,在 3 种设置下使用 heliox(80/20)持续给药阿布特罗(20 毫克/小时):(1)将 MiniHEART 雾化吸入器连接到一个 Y 型部件上,该部件由氧气以 3 升/分钟的速度驱动,并连接到一个非呼吸面罩和一个装有 11 升/分钟氦氧的带阀储液器;(2)将一个振动网状雾化器(VMN)放置在装有 11 升/分钟氦氧的高流量鼻插管(HFNC)的加湿器入口处,并将人体模型的嘴密封;以及(3)将一个振动网状雾化器放置在装有 11 升/分钟氦氧的带阀储液器和一个非呼吸面罩之间。在使用振动网状雾化器和面罩的装置中测试了紧身和宽松面罩配置。使用 VMN 和宽松面罩测试了 70/30 的氦氧饱和度。在每次 20 分钟的运行中,通过输液泵以 8 毫升(20 毫克)/小时的速度向雾化器持续输送阿布特罗,每次实验重复五次。每次运行后,移除放置在人体模型气管和肺部模型之间的收集过滤器,洗脱药物并通过紫外分光光度法(276 纳米)进行检测:在使用 heliox 进行连续阿布特罗雾化时,与 HFNC 配合使用的 VMN 或使用紧身面罩的 VMN 可获得最高且相似的吸入剂量(8.5 ± 0.4 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%,P = .35),而 MiniHEART 雾化器产生的气溶胶沉积量最低(1.5 ± 0.2%)。宽松面罩的吸入剂量低于紧身面罩(5.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%,P=.009),80/20 的氦氧饱和度比 70/30 的氦氧饱和度吸入剂量高(5.9 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 0.4%,P=.009):结论:在儿科模型中使用氦氧饱和度持续施用阿布特罗时,与 MiniHEART 雾化器和带宽松面罩的 VMN 相比,在闭口呼吸时使用与 HFNC 一致的 VMN 可获得更高的吸入剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信