Rationale and Design for the BLOCK-SAH Study (Pterygopalatine Fossa Block as an Opioid-Sparing Treatment for Acute Headache in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage): A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with a Sequential Parallel Comparison Design.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02078-z
Katharina M Busl, Cameron R Smith, Andrea B Troxel, Maurizio Fava, Nicholas Illenberger, Ralisa Pop, Wenqing Yang, Luciola Martins Frota, Hanzhi Gao, Guogen Shan, Brian L Hoh, Carolina B Maciel
{"title":"Rationale and Design for the BLOCK-SAH Study (Pterygopalatine Fossa Block as an Opioid-Sparing Treatment for Acute Headache in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage): A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial with a Sequential Parallel Comparison Design.","authors":"Katharina M Busl, Cameron R Smith, Andrea B Troxel, Maurizio Fava, Nicholas Illenberger, Ralisa Pop, Wenqing Yang, Luciola Martins Frota, Hanzhi Gao, Guogen Shan, Brian L Hoh, Carolina B Maciel","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02078-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute post-subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) headaches are common and severe. Management strategies for post-SAH headaches are limited, with heavy reliance on opioids, and pain control is overall poor. Pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) nerve blocks have shown promising results in treatment of acute headache, including our preliminary and published experience with PPF-blocks for refractory post-SAH headache during hospitalization. The BLOCK-SAH trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral PPF-blocks in awake patients with severe headaches from aneurysmal SAH who require opioids for pain control and are able to verbalize pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BLOCK-SAH is a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial using the sequential parallel comparison design (SPCD), followed by an open-label phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 12 sites in the United States, 195 eligible study participants will be randomized into three groups to receive bilateral active or placebo PPF-injections for 2 consecutive days with periprocedural monitoring of intracranial arterial mean flow velocities with transcranial Doppler, according to SPCD (group 1: active block followed by placebo; group 2: placebo followed by active block; group 3: placebo followed by placebo). PPF-injections will be delivered under ultrasound guidance and will comprise 5-mL injectates of 20 mg of ropivacaine plus 4 mg of dexamethasone (active PPF-block) or saline solution (placebo PPF-injection).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The trial has a primary efficacy end point (oral morphine equivalent/day use within 24 h after each PPF-injection), a primary safety end point (incidence of radiographic vasospasm at 48 h from first PPF-injection), and a primary tolerability end point (rate of acceptance of second PPF-injection following the first PPF-injection). BLOCK-SAH will inform the design of a phase III trial to establish the efficacy of PPF-block, accounting for different headache phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"290-300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02078-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute post-subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) headaches are common and severe. Management strategies for post-SAH headaches are limited, with heavy reliance on opioids, and pain control is overall poor. Pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) nerve blocks have shown promising results in treatment of acute headache, including our preliminary and published experience with PPF-blocks for refractory post-SAH headache during hospitalization. The BLOCK-SAH trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral PPF-blocks in awake patients with severe headaches from aneurysmal SAH who require opioids for pain control and are able to verbalize pain scores.

Methods: BLOCK-SAH is a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial using the sequential parallel comparison design (SPCD), followed by an open-label phase.

Results: Across 12 sites in the United States, 195 eligible study participants will be randomized into three groups to receive bilateral active or placebo PPF-injections for 2 consecutive days with periprocedural monitoring of intracranial arterial mean flow velocities with transcranial Doppler, according to SPCD (group 1: active block followed by placebo; group 2: placebo followed by active block; group 3: placebo followed by placebo). PPF-injections will be delivered under ultrasound guidance and will comprise 5-mL injectates of 20 mg of ropivacaine plus 4 mg of dexamethasone (active PPF-block) or saline solution (placebo PPF-injection).

Conclusions: The trial has a primary efficacy end point (oral morphine equivalent/day use within 24 h after each PPF-injection), a primary safety end point (incidence of radiographic vasospasm at 48 h from first PPF-injection), and a primary tolerability end point (rate of acceptance of second PPF-injection following the first PPF-injection). BLOCK-SAH will inform the design of a phase III trial to establish the efficacy of PPF-block, accounting for different headache phenotypes.

Abstract Image

BLOCK-SAH研究(翼腭窝阻滞作为动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血急性头痛的阿片类药物节约型治疗方法)的原理和设计:采用顺序平行比较设计的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验(II 期)。
背景:急性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后头痛既常见又严重。针对蛛网膜下腔出血后头痛的治疗策略非常有限,主要依赖阿片类药物,疼痛控制效果总体不佳。翼腭窝(PPF)神经阻滞在治疗急性头痛方面显示出良好的效果,包括我们在住院期间使用 PPF 阻滞治疗难治性 SAH 后头痛的初步和已发表的经验。BLOCK-SAH试验旨在评估双侧PPF神经阻滞治疗清醒的动脉瘤性SAH重度头痛患者的有效性和安全性,这些患者需要阿片类药物来控制疼痛,并能用语言表达疼痛评分:BLOCK-SAH是一项II期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验,采用顺序平行比较设计(SPCD),随后是开放标签阶段:在美国的 12 个研究机构中,195 名符合条件的研究人员将被随机分为三组,连续两天接受双侧活性或安慰剂 PPF 注射,并根据 SPCD(第 1 组:活性阻滞后注射安慰剂;第 2 组:安慰剂后注射活性阻滞;第 3 组:安慰剂后注射安慰剂)对经颅多普勒颅内动脉平均血流速度进行围术期监测。PPF注射将在超声引导下进行,包括20毫克罗哌卡因加4毫克地塞米松(活性PPF阻滞)或生理盐水(安慰剂PPF注射)的5毫升注射液:该试验有一个主要疗效终点(每次PPF注射后24小时内口服吗啡当量/天)、一个主要安全性终点(首次PPF注射后48小时内放射学血管痉挛发生率)和一个主要耐受性终点(首次PPF注射后接受第二次PPF注射的比率)。BLOCK-SAH将为III期试验的设计提供依据,以便根据不同的头痛表型确定PPF阻断剂的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信