Impact of Aphasia on Brain Activation to Motor Commands in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Samuel D Jacobson, Vedant Kansara, Stephanie Assuras, Qi Shen, Lucie Kruger, Jerina Carmona, You Lim Song, Lizbeth Cespedes, Mariam Yazdi, Angela Velazquez, Ian Gonzales, Satoshi Egawa, E Sander Connolly, Shivani Ghoshal, David Roh, Sachin Agarwal, Soojin Park, Jan Claassen
{"title":"Impact of Aphasia on Brain Activation to Motor Commands in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.","authors":"Samuel D Jacobson, Vedant Kansara, Stephanie Assuras, Qi Shen, Lucie Kruger, Jerina Carmona, You Lim Song, Lizbeth Cespedes, Mariam Yazdi, Angela Velazquez, Ian Gonzales, Satoshi Egawa, E Sander Connolly, Shivani Ghoshal, David Roh, Sachin Agarwal, Soojin Park, Jan Claassen","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02086-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain activation to motor commands is seen in 15% of clinically unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. This state called cognitive motor dissociation (CMD) is detectable by electroencephalogram (EEG) or functional magnetic resonance imaging, predicts long-term recovery, and is recommended by recent guidelines to support prognostication. However, false negative CMD results are a particular concern, and occult aphasia in clinically unresponsive patients may be a major factor. This study aimed to quantify the impact of aphasia on CMD testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively studied 61 intensive care unit patients admitted with acute primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who had behavioral evidence of command following or were able to mimic motor commands. All patients underwent an EEG-based motor command paradigm used to detect CMD and comprehensive aphasia assessments. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of brain activation, including aphasia types and associations with recovery of independence (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥ 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 61 patients, 50 completed aphasia and the EEG-based motor command paradigm. A total of 72% (n = 36) were diagnosed with aphasia. Patients with impaired comprehension (i.e., receptive or global aphasia) were less likely to show brain activation than those with intact comprehension (odds ratio [OR] 0.23 [95% confidence interval 0.05-0.89], p = 0.04). Brain activation was independently associated with Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended ≥ 4 by 12 months (OR 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.2-5.0], p = 0.01) accounting for the Functional Outcome in Patients with Primary ICH score (OR1.3 [95% confidence interval 1.0-1.8], p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brain activation to motor commands is four times less likely for patients with primary ICH with impaired comprehension. False negative results due to occult receptive aphasia need to be considered when interpreting CMD testing. Early detection of brain activation may help predict long-term recovery in conscious patients with ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02086-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brain activation to motor commands is seen in 15% of clinically unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. This state called cognitive motor dissociation (CMD) is detectable by electroencephalogram (EEG) or functional magnetic resonance imaging, predicts long-term recovery, and is recommended by recent guidelines to support prognostication. However, false negative CMD results are a particular concern, and occult aphasia in clinically unresponsive patients may be a major factor. This study aimed to quantify the impact of aphasia on CMD testing.

Methods: We prospectively studied 61 intensive care unit patients admitted with acute primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who had behavioral evidence of command following or were able to mimic motor commands. All patients underwent an EEG-based motor command paradigm used to detect CMD and comprehensive aphasia assessments. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of brain activation, including aphasia types and associations with recovery of independence (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥ 4).

Results: Of 61 patients, 50 completed aphasia and the EEG-based motor command paradigm. A total of 72% (n = 36) were diagnosed with aphasia. Patients with impaired comprehension (i.e., receptive or global aphasia) were less likely to show brain activation than those with intact comprehension (odds ratio [OR] 0.23 [95% confidence interval 0.05-0.89], p = 0.04). Brain activation was independently associated with Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended ≥ 4 by 12 months (OR 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.2-5.0], p = 0.01) accounting for the Functional Outcome in Patients with Primary ICH score (OR1.3 [95% confidence interval 1.0-1.8], p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Brain activation to motor commands is four times less likely for patients with primary ICH with impaired comprehension. False negative results due to occult receptive aphasia need to be considered when interpreting CMD testing. Early detection of brain activation may help predict long-term recovery in conscious patients with ICH.

Abstract Image

失语症对急性脑出血患者大脑运动指令激活的影响
背景:在临床上反应迟钝的急性脑损伤患者中,有15%的患者会出现大脑对运动指令的激活状态。这种被称为认知运动分离(CMD)的状态可通过脑电图(EEG)或功能磁共振成像检测到,可预测长期恢复情况,并被近期指南推荐用于支持预后。然而,CMD假阴性结果尤其令人担忧,临床无反应患者的隐性失语可能是一个主要因素。本研究旨在量化失语症对CMD测试的影响:我们对 61 名因急性原发性脑内出血(ICH)入院的重症监护室患者进行了前瞻性研究,这些患者在行为上有听从命令或能够模仿运动指令的迹象。所有患者都接受了基于脑电图的运动指令范式,该范式用于检测CMD和综合失语症评估。逻辑回归用于确定大脑激活的预测因素,包括失语症类型以及与独立性恢复的关联(格拉斯哥结果量表-扩展评分≥4分):61名患者中,50人完成了失语和基于脑电图的运动指令范式。共有 72% 的患者(n = 36)被诊断为失语症。与理解能力完好的患者相比,理解能力受损(即接受性或全局性失语)的患者出现脑激活的可能性较低(几率比 [OR] 0.23 [95% 置信区间 0.05-0.89],P = 0.04)。脑激活与12个月后格拉斯哥结果量表扩展版≥4分(OR 2.4 [95%置信区间1.2-5.0],p = 0.01)独立相关,与原发性ICH患者功能结果评分(OR1.3 [95%置信区间1.0-1.8],p = 0.01)相关:原发性 ICH 患者的大脑对运动指令的激活率是理解力受损患者的四倍。在解释CMD测试时,需要考虑隐性接受性失语导致的假阴性结果。早期发现脑激活有助于预测意识清醒的 ICH 患者的长期康复情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信