Cannulated Screws or Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Is There a Mortality Difference?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Austen L Thompson, Nicolas P Kuttner, Marc Greenberg, Krystin A Hidden, Brandon J Yuan
{"title":"Cannulated Screws or Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Is There a Mortality Difference?","authors":"Austen L Thompson, Nicolas P Kuttner, Marc Greenberg, Krystin A Hidden, Brandon J Yuan","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the difference in mortality and reoperation rate between femoral neck fractures (FNFx) treated with cannulated screw fixation (CS) or hemiarthroplasty (HA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutional registry data from a single Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Inclusion criteria were patients ≥60 years old with a FNFx (AO/OTA 31-B) who underwent primary operative treatment with a HA or CS.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Mortality and reoperation rates following primary operative treatment between patients treated with either hemiarthroplasty or cannulated screws. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated. Comparisons in the primary outcomes were made between the hemiarthroplasty or cannulated screw cohorts using univariate and multivariate analysis where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,211 patients were included in the study (1,721 HA and 490 CS) and followed for an average of 34.5 months. The average age was 82.3 years (60-106 years) and predominantly female (66.3%). 1-year mortality was higher for the HA group compared to CS with a HR of 1.37 (p=0.03), however over the lifetime of patient or to final follow up, survival was not statistically significant with a RR of 0.95 95% CI, 0.83-1.1, p=0.97) The rate of reoperation at one year was lower for HA (5.0%) than for CS (10.1%), (HR 3.0, 95% CI, 2.1-4.34, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with FNFx treated with hemiarthroplasty had the same risk of mortality as those patients treated with cannulated screws across lifetime of patients or until final follow up. There is no difference in mortality at the 30- and 90-day timepoint, but a significant difference in mortality at 1 year. Hemiarthroplasty treatment was associated with a significantly lower reoperation risk when compared to cannulated screws across the lifetime of the patient or until final follow up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the difference in mortality and reoperation rate between femoral neck fractures (FNFx) treated with cannulated screw fixation (CS) or hemiarthroplasty (HA).

Methods: Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Institutional registry data from a single Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Inclusion criteria were patients ≥60 years old with a FNFx (AO/OTA 31-B) who underwent primary operative treatment with a HA or CS.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Mortality and reoperation rates following primary operative treatment between patients treated with either hemiarthroplasty or cannulated screws. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated. Comparisons in the primary outcomes were made between the hemiarthroplasty or cannulated screw cohorts using univariate and multivariate analysis where appropriate.

Results: A total of 2,211 patients were included in the study (1,721 HA and 490 CS) and followed for an average of 34.5 months. The average age was 82.3 years (60-106 years) and predominantly female (66.3%). 1-year mortality was higher for the HA group compared to CS with a HR of 1.37 (p=0.03), however over the lifetime of patient or to final follow up, survival was not statistically significant with a RR of 0.95 95% CI, 0.83-1.1, p=0.97) The rate of reoperation at one year was lower for HA (5.0%) than for CS (10.1%), (HR 3.0, 95% CI, 2.1-4.34, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients with FNFx treated with hemiarthroplasty had the same risk of mortality as those patients treated with cannulated screws across lifetime of patients or until final follow up. There is no difference in mortality at the 30- and 90-day timepoint, but a significant difference in mortality at 1 year. Hemiarthroplasty treatment was associated with a significantly lower reoperation risk when compared to cannulated screws across the lifetime of the patient or until final follow up.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

股骨颈骨折采用套管螺钉还是半关节成形术?死亡率有差异吗?
目的确定股骨颈骨折(FNFx)采用套管螺钉固定术(CS)或半关节成形术(HA)治疗时死亡率和再手术率的差异:设计:回顾性研究:设计:回顾性研究:患者选择标准:纳入标准:年龄≥60岁、患有FNFx(AO/OTA 31-B)、接受过HA或CS初级手术治疗的患者:结果测量和比较:采用半关节成形术或套管螺钉进行初次手术治疗的患者的死亡率和再次手术率。生成 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线。在适当情况下,使用单变量和多变量分析比较了半关节成形术或套管螺钉组之间的主要结果:共有 2,211 名患者参与研究(1,721 名 HA 和 490 名 CS),平均随访 34.5 个月。平均年龄为 82.3 岁(60-106 岁),以女性为主(66.3%)。与 CS 相比,HA 组的 1 年死亡率较高,HR 为 1.37(P=0.03),但在患者的整个生命周期或最终随访期间,存活率并无统计学意义,RR 为 0.95 95% CI,0.83-1.1,P=0.97)一年后再次手术的比例 HA(5.0%)低于 CS(10.1%),(HR 为 3.0,95% CI,2.1-4.34,P 结论:接受半关节成形术治疗的 FNFx 患者在整个生命周期或最终随访前的死亡风险与接受套管螺钉治疗的患者相同。30天和90天的死亡率没有差异,但1年的死亡率有显著差异。在患者的整个生命周期或最终随访期间,半关节成形术治疗与带锁螺钉治疗相比,再手术风险显著降低:证据等级:三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信