Investigation of the relationship between gross motor maturation from 1 to 18 months and preschool gross motor performance in at-risk infants.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ozge Karanlik, Gonul Acar, Semih Ayta
{"title":"Investigation of the relationship between gross motor maturation from 1 to 18 months and preschool gross motor performance in at-risk infants.","authors":"Ozge Karanlik, Gonul Acar, Semih Ayta","doi":"10.1111/jep.14115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At-risk infants are predisposed to major and minor neurodevelopmental disorders due to various biological and environmental factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between gross motor maturation from 1 to 18 months and gross motor performance in the preschool period, as well as the risk of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) in at-risk infants, referred to the Family Counselling Center of the Turkish Spastic Children's Foundation (FCCTSCF) between 2014 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-seven children who had their gross motor maturation assessed between 1 and 18 months at the FCCTSCF were re-evaluated in the preschool period. The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was used to evaluate gross motor maturation between 1 and 18 months. In contrast, the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire were used to assess gross motor performance in the preschool period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the at-risk infants included in the study, 45.6% were evaluated as having typical development, 21% were identified as having cerebral palsy (CP), and 33.3% were determined to be at risk for DCD. Children with CP and those at risk for DCD were found to have lower percentile ranks on the past AIMS test compared to the healthy group (p = 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the clinical follow-up of at-risk infants, those who scored low on AIMS should be monitored for future risk of DCD and minor disorders, even if major neurological issues such as cerebral palsy are not detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At-risk infants are predisposed to major and minor neurodevelopmental disorders due to various biological and environmental factors.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between gross motor maturation from 1 to 18 months and gross motor performance in the preschool period, as well as the risk of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) in at-risk infants, referred to the Family Counselling Center of the Turkish Spastic Children's Foundation (FCCTSCF) between 2014 and 2016.

Methods: Fifty-seven children who had their gross motor maturation assessed between 1 and 18 months at the FCCTSCF were re-evaluated in the preschool period. The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was used to evaluate gross motor maturation between 1 and 18 months. In contrast, the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire were used to assess gross motor performance in the preschool period.

Results: Of the at-risk infants included in the study, 45.6% were evaluated as having typical development, 21% were identified as having cerebral palsy (CP), and 33.3% were determined to be at risk for DCD. Children with CP and those at risk for DCD were found to have lower percentile ranks on the past AIMS test compared to the healthy group (p = 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (p = 0.014).

Conclusion: In the clinical follow-up of at-risk infants, those who scored low on AIMS should be monitored for future risk of DCD and minor disorders, even if major neurological issues such as cerebral palsy are not detected.

调查高危婴儿 1 到 18 个月的粗大运动成熟度与学前粗大运动表现之间的关系。
背景:由于各种生理和环境因素的影响,高危婴儿容易患上严重或轻微的神经发育障碍:本研究旨在调查1至18个月大运动成熟度与学龄前大运动表现之间的关系,以及2014至2016年间转诊至土耳其痉挛儿童基金会家庭咨询中心的高危婴儿患发育协调障碍(DCD)的风险:在学龄前期重新评估了 57 名曾在 FCCTSCF 接受过 1 到 18 个月大运动成熟度评估的儿童。阿尔伯塔婴儿运动量表(AIMS)用于评估1至18个月大的大运动成熟度。相比之下,粗大运动功能测量-88和发育协调障碍问卷则用于评估学龄前儿童的粗大运动表现:在被纳入研究的高危婴儿中,45.6%的婴儿被评估为具有典型发育,21%的婴儿被确定为患有脑瘫(CP),33.3%的婴儿被确定为面临发育障碍风险。与健康组相比,CP 患儿和有 DCD 风险的儿童在过去的 AIMS 测试中的百分位数较低 (p = 0.001)。阿尔伯塔婴儿运动量表与粗大运动功能测量-88之间存在明显的正相关(p = 0.014):结论:在对高危婴儿进行临床随访时,即使未发现脑瘫等主要神经系统问题,也应监测那些在 AIMS 中得分较低的婴儿,以防他们将来可能患上 DCD 和轻微疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信