Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule Therapies in Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mohammad Shehab, Amro Hassan, Fatema Alrashed, Adnan Abbas, Christopher Ma, Neeraj Narula, Vipul Jairath, Siddharth Singh, Talat Bessissow
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule Therapies in Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Shehab, Amro Hassan, Fatema Alrashed, Adnan Abbas, Christopher Ma, Neeraj Narula, Vipul Jairath, Siddharth Singh, Talat Bessissow","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disorder with a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which has been recently recognized as an important treatment target. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of different biologics and small molecule therapies in achieving better patient-reported outcomes and HRQoL in patients with UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception until February 1, 2024. The primary endpoint was clinical remission in the patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) score in UC patients who were treated with different biologics or small molecules during induction and maintenance phases. PRO-2 score is the sum of both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores. The secondary outcome was improvement of HRQoL defined as an increase in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score of ≥16 points from baseline or any change in total score from baseline. A random effects model was used, and outcomes were reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Interventions were ranked per the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 studies were included in the primary outcome analysis and 15 studies were included in the secondary outcome analysis. The primary analysis showed that during the induction phase all of included drugs were better than placebo in improving the PRO-2 score. Interestingly, upadacitinib was found to be superior to most medications in improving PRO-2 scores. The secondary analysis showed that guselkumab ranked first in the improvement of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, followed by upadacitinib during the induction phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during the induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, mirikizumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL in UC, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disorder with a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which has been recently recognized as an important treatment target. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of different biologics and small molecule therapies in achieving better patient-reported outcomes and HRQoL in patients with UC.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception until February 1, 2024. The primary endpoint was clinical remission in the patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) score in UC patients who were treated with different biologics or small molecules during induction and maintenance phases. PRO-2 score is the sum of both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores. The secondary outcome was improvement of HRQoL defined as an increase in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score of ≥16 points from baseline or any change in total score from baseline. A random effects model was used, and outcomes were reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Interventions were ranked per the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) score.

Results: A total of 54 studies were included in the primary outcome analysis and 15 studies were included in the secondary outcome analysis. The primary analysis showed that during the induction phase all of included drugs were better than placebo in improving the PRO-2 score. Interestingly, upadacitinib was found to be superior to most medications in improving PRO-2 scores. The secondary analysis showed that guselkumab ranked first in the improvement of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, followed by upadacitinib during the induction phase.

Conclusion: Upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during the induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, mirikizumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL in UC, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.

生物制剂和小分子疗法在改善溃疡性结肠炎患者报告结果方面的疗效比较:系统回顾与网络元分析》。
背景:溃疡性结肠炎(UC)是一种慢性疾病,对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)有相当大的负面影响,最近已被视为重要的治疗目标。本研究旨在比较不同生物制剂和小分子疗法在改善 UC 患者的患者报告结果和 HRQoL 方面的疗效:我们对 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane Central 数据库中从开始到 2024 年 2 月 1 日的数据进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。主要终点是在诱导和维持阶段接受不同生物制剂或小分子药物治疗的 UC 患者的患者报告结果(PRO-2)评分的临床缓解情况。PRO-2评分是大便次数和直肠出血两个子评分的总和。次要结局是 HRQoL 的改善,定义为炎症性肠病问卷得分比基线增加≥16 分或总分比基线有任何变化。采用随机效应模型,结果以几率比和 95% 置信区间报告。根据 SUCRA(累积排名曲线下表面)得分对干预措施进行排名:共有 54 项研究纳入了主要结果分析,15 项研究纳入了次要结果分析。主要分析结果显示,在诱导阶段,所有纳入的药物在改善 PRO-2 评分方面均优于安慰剂。有趣的是,研究发现达达替尼在改善 PRO-2 评分方面优于大多数药物。二次分析显示,在诱导阶段,古舍库单抗在改善炎症性肠病问卷评分方面排名第一,其次是乌达替尼:结论:在诱导和维持阶段,达达替尼在PRO-2临床缓解方面排名第一。Guselkumab、mirikizumab、托法替尼和upadacitinib是唯一在改善UC患者HRQoL方面优于安慰剂的新型药物,其中Guselkumab排名第一,其次是托法替尼和upadacitinib。在维持缓解期间,托法替尼在改善HRQoL方面排名第一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信