Metabolic syndrome risk prediction in an Australian sample with first-episode psychosis using the psychosis metabolic risk calculator: A validation study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Scott B Teasdale, Oliver Ardill-Young, Rachel Morell, Philip B Ward, Golam M Khandaker, Rachel Upthegrove, Jackie Curtis, Benjamin I Perry
{"title":"Metabolic syndrome risk prediction in an Australian sample with first-episode psychosis using the psychosis metabolic risk calculator: A validation study.","authors":"Scott B Teasdale, Oliver Ardill-Young, Rachel Morell, Philip B Ward, Golam M Khandaker, Rachel Upthegrove, Jackie Curtis, Benjamin I Perry","doi":"10.1177/10398562241269171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the accuracy and likely clinical usefulness of the Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator (PsyMetRiC) in predicting up-to six-year risk of incident metabolic syndrome in an Australian sample of young people with first-episode psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study at a secondary care early psychosis treatment service among people aged 16-35 years, extracting relevant data at the time of antipsychotic commencement and between one-to-six-years later. We assessed algorithm accuracy primarily via discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (calibration plots) and clinical usefulness (decision curve analysis). Model updating and recalibration generated a site-specific (Australian) PsyMetRiC version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 116 people with baseline and follow-up data: 73% male, mean age 20.1 years, mean follow-up 2.6 years, metabolic syndrome prevalence 13%. C-statistics for both partial- (C = 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.75) and full-models (C = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.77) were acceptable; however, calibration plots demonstrated consistent under-prediction of risk. Recalibration and updating led to slightly improved C-statistics, greatly improved agreement between observed and predicted risk, and a narrow window of likely clinical usefulness improved significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An updated and recalibrated PsyMetRiC model, PsyMetRiC-Australia, shows promise. Validation in a large sample is required to confirm its accuracy and clinical usefulness for the Australian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241269171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the accuracy and likely clinical usefulness of the Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator (PsyMetRiC) in predicting up-to six-year risk of incident metabolic syndrome in an Australian sample of young people with first-episode psychosis.

Method: We conducted a retrospective study at a secondary care early psychosis treatment service among people aged 16-35 years, extracting relevant data at the time of antipsychotic commencement and between one-to-six-years later. We assessed algorithm accuracy primarily via discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (calibration plots) and clinical usefulness (decision curve analysis). Model updating and recalibration generated a site-specific (Australian) PsyMetRiC version.

Results: We included 116 people with baseline and follow-up data: 73% male, mean age 20.1 years, mean follow-up 2.6 years, metabolic syndrome prevalence 13%. C-statistics for both partial- (C = 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.75) and full-models (C = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.77) were acceptable; however, calibration plots demonstrated consistent under-prediction of risk. Recalibration and updating led to slightly improved C-statistics, greatly improved agreement between observed and predicted risk, and a narrow window of likely clinical usefulness improved significantly.

Conclusion: An updated and recalibrated PsyMetRiC model, PsyMetRiC-Australia, shows promise. Validation in a large sample is required to confirm its accuracy and clinical usefulness for the Australian population.

使用精神病代谢风险计算器预测澳大利亚首发精神病样本的代谢综合征风险:验证研究。
目的研究精神病代谢风险计算器(Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator,PsyMetRiC)在预测澳大利亚初发精神病年轻人长达六年的代谢综合征发病风险方面的准确性和临床实用性:我们在一家二级医疗机构的早期精神病治疗服务机构对 16-35 岁的患者进行了一项回顾性研究,提取了他们开始服用抗精神病药物时以及一至六年后的相关数据。我们主要通过区分度(C 统计量)、校准(校准图)和临床实用性(决策曲线分析)来评估算法的准确性。模型更新和重新校准生成了针对特定地区(澳大利亚)的 PsyMetRiC 版本:我们纳入了 116 名有基线和随访数据的人:73%为男性,平均年龄为 20.1 岁,平均随访时间为 2.6 年,代谢综合征发病率为 13%。部分模型(C = 0.71,95% CI 0.64-0.75)和完整模型(C = 0.72,95% CI 0.65-0.77)的 C 统计量均可接受;然而,校准图显示风险预测始终不足。重新校准和更新后,C 统计量略有提高,观察到的风险与预测风险之间的一致性大大提高,临床实用性的窄窗口也显著提高:结论:经过更新和重新校准的 PsyMetRiC 模型 PsyMetRiC-Australia 很有前途。需要在大样本中进行验证,以确认其在澳大利亚人口中的准确性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信