The Glass Ceiling in Global Health: Perspectives of Female and Male Anesthesiologists.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Bojana Matejic, Brett D Nelson, Lisa Collins, Miodrag S Milenovic
{"title":"The Glass Ceiling in Global Health: Perspectives of Female and Male Anesthesiologists.","authors":"Bojana Matejic, Brett D Nelson, Lisa Collins, Miodrag S Milenovic","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender equity is essential for improving health outcomes globally. Despite comprising 75% of the global health workforce and dominating academic global health programs, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in global health organizations. Our study aimed to identify potential gender differences in the beliefs and attitudes regarding barriers that women anesthesiologists encounter in pursuing careers and leadership roles in global health and to identify recommendations for improving gender equity in global health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey focusing on career leadership opportunities and challenges uniquely faced by women clinicians in global health. We obtained permission from the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists to distribute our questionnaire to their leadership committee members during 2 months (May-July 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was distributed to 164 study participants with 67 individuals (44.8% female) based in 38 different countries completing the survey (response rate 40.9%). Overall, 47.8% of the participants aspired to a leadership position in global health and 58.2% agreed women face unique barriers to global health leadership (70.0% of women compared to 48.6% of men; P = .081). Female gender (odds ratio [OR], 19.22, P = .004) and divorced marital status (OR, 746.26, P = .004) were positively associated and African ethnicity (OR, 0.002, P = .017) was negatively associated with the perception of gender bias in their career growth. The main challenges included balancing work and family responsibilities, lack of female mentors or role models, gender-based discrimination, and limited opportunities for career advancement. Men acknowledged these challenges but reported personally experiencing them to a lesser extent, particularly concerning lack of opportunities (P = .005), inadequate pay (P = .000), and lack of training (P = .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender disparities exist in the pursuit of global health careers. This study underscored that more women than men perceive barriers in pursuing leadership roles in global health and that men generally encounter these obstacles to a lesser extent. Female representation in leadership positions could be supported through evidence-informed policies that promote work-life balance, improve mentorship, offer equal opportunities for career advancement and adequate pay, and combat gender-based discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender equity is essential for improving health outcomes globally. Despite comprising 75% of the global health workforce and dominating academic global health programs, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in global health organizations. Our study aimed to identify potential gender differences in the beliefs and attitudes regarding barriers that women anesthesiologists encounter in pursuing careers and leadership roles in global health and to identify recommendations for improving gender equity in global health.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey focusing on career leadership opportunities and challenges uniquely faced by women clinicians in global health. We obtained permission from the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists to distribute our questionnaire to their leadership committee members during 2 months (May-July 2022).

Results: The questionnaire was distributed to 164 study participants with 67 individuals (44.8% female) based in 38 different countries completing the survey (response rate 40.9%). Overall, 47.8% of the participants aspired to a leadership position in global health and 58.2% agreed women face unique barriers to global health leadership (70.0% of women compared to 48.6% of men; P = .081). Female gender (odds ratio [OR], 19.22, P = .004) and divorced marital status (OR, 746.26, P = .004) were positively associated and African ethnicity (OR, 0.002, P = .017) was negatively associated with the perception of gender bias in their career growth. The main challenges included balancing work and family responsibilities, lack of female mentors or role models, gender-based discrimination, and limited opportunities for career advancement. Men acknowledged these challenges but reported personally experiencing them to a lesser extent, particularly concerning lack of opportunities (P = .005), inadequate pay (P = .000), and lack of training (P = .000).

Conclusions: Gender disparities exist in the pursuit of global health careers. This study underscored that more women than men perceive barriers in pursuing leadership roles in global health and that men generally encounter these obstacles to a lesser extent. Female representation in leadership positions could be supported through evidence-informed policies that promote work-life balance, improve mentorship, offer equal opportunities for career advancement and adequate pay, and combat gender-based discrimination.

全球卫生领域的玻璃天花板:男女麻醉师的观点。
背景:性别平等对于改善全球卫生成果至关重要。尽管女性占全球卫生工作者总数的 75%,并在全球卫生学术项目中占据主导地位,但在全球卫生组织的领导岗位上,女性的比例仍然偏低。我们的研究旨在确定女麻醉师在追求全球卫生事业和领导职位时遇到的障碍方面的信念和态度的潜在性别差异,并确定改善全球卫生领域性别平等的建议:我们进行了一项横断面在线调查,重点是全球健康领域女临床医生所面临的职业领导机会和挑战。我们获得了世界麻醉医师学会联合会的许可,在两个月的时间内(2022 年 5 月至 7 月)向其领导委员会成员发放问卷:调查问卷共发放给 164 名研究参与者,来自 38 个不同国家的 67 人(44.8% 为女性)完成了调查(回复率为 40.9%)。总体而言,47.8%的参与者希望在全球卫生领域担任领导职务,58.2%的参与者认为女性在担任全球卫生领导职务方面面临独特的障碍(女性为 70.0%,男性为 48.6%;P = .081)。女性性别(几率比 [OR],19.22,P = .004)和离异婚姻状况(OR,746.26,P = .004)与职业发展中的性别偏见感呈正相关,非洲裔(OR,0.002,P = .017)与职业发展中的性别偏见感呈负相关。主要挑战包括平衡工作与家庭责任、缺乏女性导师或榜样、性别歧视以及职业发展机会有限。男性也承认存在这些挑战,但表示亲身经历的程度较低,尤其是在缺乏机会(P = 0.005)、薪酬不足(P = 0.000)和缺乏培训(P = 0.000)方面:结论:在从事全球卫生事业方面存在性别差异。本研究强调,在追求全球卫生领域领导职位的过程中,认为存在障碍的女性多于男性,而男性遇到的障碍一般较少。女性担任领导职务可以通过有实证依据的政策来支持,这些政策可以促进工作与生活的平衡、改善导师关系、提供平等的职业发展机会和适当的薪酬,以及打击基于性别的歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信