Efficiency assessment of cord blood banking and compatibility with delayed cord clamping.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Geethika S Manchanayake, Elisenda Farssac Busquets, Ana García Buendia, Patrícia Ferrer, Gisela Palomar, Maria José Pelegay, Irene Ribera, Carmen Azqueta, Dinara Samarkanova, Jesus Fernandez-Sojo, Nerea Castillo Flores, Sergio Querol
{"title":"Efficiency assessment of cord blood banking and compatibility with delayed cord clamping.","authors":"Geethika S Manchanayake, Elisenda Farssac Busquets, Ana García Buendia, Patrícia Ferrer, Gisela Palomar, Maria José Pelegay, Irene Ribera, Carmen Azqueta, Dinara Samarkanova, Jesus Fernandez-Sojo, Nerea Castillo Flores, Sergio Querol","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is debate whether delayed umbilical cord clamping following delivery, the current gold standard, affects the proportion of cord blood units (CBU) suitable for public cord blood banking. This study was designed to assess the impact of delayed cord clamping on the number of CBU suitable for therapeutic uses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To minimize variability, data from the four most active collection centers within the Programa Concordia (Spain) were included. Data on CBU collected in utero from mothers following normal vaginal deliveries from July 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. The weight of the collection bags (as a surrogate of volume) and total nucleated cell (TNC) count were analyzed according to three defined clamping times: 30 s, 60 s and ≥120 s. The CBU were stratified as suitable for stem cell transplantation (≥110 g and ≥1,500×10<sup>6</sup> TNC/unit) or other clinical applications (≥100 g but TNC count below the threshold).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>- There were 131 (18%), 548 (76%), and 40 (5%) CBU collected at 30 s, 60 s and ≥120 s, respectively. The median weight of the CBU decreased gradually with time, with a significant difference between units collected when the cord was clamped at 30 s or 60 s (p=0.036), so significantly fewer CBU met the minimal weight criterion (100 g) at 60 s than at 30 s (p=0.002). However, this was not reflected by the TNC available, resulting in non-statistical differences in CBU eligible for banking between these times. The major predictor of collection success was the neonate's birth-weight.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>-Despite decreases in the volume of cord blood collected when cord clamping at 30 s or 60 s, TNC count is maintained resulting in similar numbers of CBU eligible for banking. The different clamping delays investigated in this study are, therefore, compatible with public cord blood banking needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49260,"journal":{"name":"Blood Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is debate whether delayed umbilical cord clamping following delivery, the current gold standard, affects the proportion of cord blood units (CBU) suitable for public cord blood banking. This study was designed to assess the impact of delayed cord clamping on the number of CBU suitable for therapeutic uses.

Materials and methods: To minimize variability, data from the four most active collection centers within the Programa Concordia (Spain) were included. Data on CBU collected in utero from mothers following normal vaginal deliveries from July 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. The weight of the collection bags (as a surrogate of volume) and total nucleated cell (TNC) count were analyzed according to three defined clamping times: 30 s, 60 s and ≥120 s. The CBU were stratified as suitable for stem cell transplantation (≥110 g and ≥1,500×106 TNC/unit) or other clinical applications (≥100 g but TNC count below the threshold).

Results: - There were 131 (18%), 548 (76%), and 40 (5%) CBU collected at 30 s, 60 s and ≥120 s, respectively. The median weight of the CBU decreased gradually with time, with a significant difference between units collected when the cord was clamped at 30 s or 60 s (p=0.036), so significantly fewer CBU met the minimal weight criterion (100 g) at 60 s than at 30 s (p=0.002). However, this was not reflected by the TNC available, resulting in non-statistical differences in CBU eligible for banking between these times. The major predictor of collection success was the neonate's birth-weight.

Discussion: -Despite decreases in the volume of cord blood collected when cord clamping at 30 s or 60 s, TNC count is maintained resulting in similar numbers of CBU eligible for banking. The different clamping delays investigated in this study are, therefore, compatible with public cord blood banking needs.

脐带血库的效率评估以及与延迟脐带钳夹的兼容性。
背景:分娩后延迟夹闭脐带(目前的黄金标准)是否会影响适用于公共脐带血库的脐带血单位(CBU)的比例,目前还存在争议。本研究旨在评估延迟脐带钳夹对适合治疗用途的脐带血单位数量的影响:为尽量减少变异性,研究纳入了来自西班牙协和计划(Programa Concordia)中最活跃的四个采集中心的数据。分析了 2018 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月期间从正常阴道分娩的母亲宫内收集的 CBU 数据。收集袋的重量(作为体积的代用指标)和总有核细胞(TNC)计数根据三种定义的夹持时间进行分析:CBU 分为适合干细胞移植(≥110 克且≥1,500×106 个 TNC/个)或其他临床应用(≥100 克但 TNC 计数低于阈值):- 在 30 秒、60 秒和≥120 秒收集的 CBU 分别为 131 个(18%)、548 个(76%)和 40 个(5%)。随着时间的推移,CBU 的中位重量逐渐减少,在 30 秒或 60 秒夹紧脐带时收集到的 CBU 之间存在显著差异(P=0.036),因此在 60 秒时达到最小重量标准(100 克)的 CBU 明显少于 30 秒时(P=0.002)。然而,可用的 TNC 并未反映出这一点,导致在这些时间段内符合存库条件的 CBU 存在非统计学差异。讨论:尽管在 30 秒或 60 秒夹闭脐带时采集的脐带血量减少,但 TNC 数量保持不变,因此符合入库条件的 CBU 数量相似。因此,本研究调查的不同夹闭延迟符合公众对脐带血库的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Blood Transfusion welcomes international submissions of Original Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports and Letters on all the fields related to Transfusion Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信