Dhat Syndrome East and West: A History in Two Acts.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Diederik F Janssen
{"title":"Dhat Syndrome East and West: A History in Two Acts.","authors":"Diederik F Janssen","doi":"10.1007/s11013-024-09874-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intriguing story of dhat syndrome is that of medical modernity (psychiatry, clinical sexology) declaring medical premodernity (Ayurvedic concepts of semen loss) as its object. The early history and prehistory of this \"culture-bound\" diagnosis help understanding it as a dynamic confrontation of local, shifting knowledges. For instance, semen loss anxiety was an established motif both in European early twentieth-century psychoanalysis and again in several Indian psychodynamic texts of the 1960s. Moreover, it became problematically tied to notions of \"Indian character\". Little realized is that European venereologists were dealing with much comparable clinical presentations since the late eighteenth century, often resolving them in strikingly similar ways. For centuries, European proto-endocrinological ideas tied masculinity to the absorption and recirculation of semen, informing popular conceptions of \"semen loss\" (spermatorrhea) much comparable to those driven by dhatu physiology, dovetailing in colonial-era medicine. Expressive of growing controversy concerning this physiology after the mid-eighteenth century, a leitmotif of exaggerated fears tied to both \"quacks\" and proselytizing leading authorities such as Tissot and Lallemand, informed diagnoses of \"tabes imaginaria\", \"spermatophobia\", and \"imaginary spermatorrhea.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":47634,"journal":{"name":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-024-09874-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intriguing story of dhat syndrome is that of medical modernity (psychiatry, clinical sexology) declaring medical premodernity (Ayurvedic concepts of semen loss) as its object. The early history and prehistory of this "culture-bound" diagnosis help understanding it as a dynamic confrontation of local, shifting knowledges. For instance, semen loss anxiety was an established motif both in European early twentieth-century psychoanalysis and again in several Indian psychodynamic texts of the 1960s. Moreover, it became problematically tied to notions of "Indian character". Little realized is that European venereologists were dealing with much comparable clinical presentations since the late eighteenth century, often resolving them in strikingly similar ways. For centuries, European proto-endocrinological ideas tied masculinity to the absorption and recirculation of semen, informing popular conceptions of "semen loss" (spermatorrhea) much comparable to those driven by dhatu physiology, dovetailing in colonial-era medicine. Expressive of growing controversy concerning this physiology after the mid-eighteenth century, a leitmotif of exaggerated fears tied to both "quacks" and proselytizing leading authorities such as Tissot and Lallemand, informed diagnoses of "tabes imaginaria", "spermatophobia", and "imaginary spermatorrhea."

东西方达特综合症:两幕历史
达特综合征引人入胜之处在于,医学现代性(精神病学、临床性学)将医学前现代性(阿育吠陀的遗精概念)作为其研究对象。这种 "受文化束缚 "的诊断的早期历史和史前史有助于将其理解为当地不断变化的知识的动态对抗。例如,遗精焦虑在二十世纪早期的欧洲精神分析学中和二十世纪六十年代的一些印度心理动力学著作中都是一个既定的主题。此外,它还与 "印度人性格 "的概念联系在一起,成为一个问题。人们很少意识到,自十八世纪末以来,欧洲性病学家一直在处理类似的临床表现,并经常以惊人相似的方式解决这些问题。几个世纪以来,欧洲的原内分泌学思想将男性气质与精液的吸收和再循环联系在一起,从而形成了 "遗精"(permatorrhea)的流行概念,这与殖民地时期医学中的 "达图生理学"(dhatu physiology)非常相似。18 世纪中叶以后,有关这种生理学的争议越来越多,"庸医 "和改信他教的权威人士(如蒂索和拉勒芒)对夸大的恐惧成为一种主旋律,为 "想象性遗精"(tabes imaginaria)、"恐精症 "和 "想象性遗精"(imaginary spermatorrhea)的诊断提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication of work in three interrelated fields: medical and psychiatric anthropology, cross-cultural psychiatry, and related cross-societal and clinical epidemiological studies. The journal publishes original research, and theoretical papers based on original research, on all subjects in each of these fields. Interdisciplinary work which bridges anthropological and medical perspectives and methods which are clinically relevant are particularly welcome, as is research on the cultural context of normative and deviant behavior, including the anthropological, epidemiological and clinical aspects of the subject. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry also fosters systematic and wide-ranging examinations of the significance of culture in health care, including comparisons of how the concept of culture is operationalized in anthropological and medical disciplines. With the increasing emphasis on the cultural diversity of society, which finds its reflection in many facets of our day to day life, including health care, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is required reading in anthropology, psychiatry and general health care libraries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信