Negative prior aquatic experiences and children's aquatic competency: Do parent perceptions differ from reality?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hannah L M Calverley, Lauren A Petrass, Loretta Konjarski
{"title":"Negative prior aquatic experiences and children's aquatic competency: Do parent perceptions differ from reality?","authors":"Hannah L M Calverley, Lauren A Petrass, Loretta Konjarski","doi":"10.1002/hpja.907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue addressed: </strong>Achieving aquatic competence is recommended for preventing childhood drownings, yet many children in Victoria, Australia do not meet aquatic benchmarks despite participating in swimming and water safety programs. While few studies have explored factors influencing aquatic competency development, negative prior aquatic experiences (NPAE) have surfaced as a potential influence. Research on children's NPAE has primarily focused on parental perceptions rather than the child's actual experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents and children (aged 10-12 years) completed reliable surveys for background information and NPAE-related data. Children also completed aquatic competency assessments against benchmark standards. Chi-square tests determined relationships between NPAE and aquatic competency, and thematic analysis categorised themes related to perceptions of the child's NPAE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most parents (82.9%) indicated their child had not had NPAE, while only half (51.0%) of children did not report NPAE. Children reporting NPAE often perceived incidents as nearly drowning (41%), encompassing swimming pool environments and underwater submersion. Similarly, parents reported varied situations, noting NPAE involving open water and the child's loss of control. Parent-reported NPAE was associated with children less likely to achieve knowledge, continuous swimming, and survival competency benchmarks (p < .05). Children reporting NPAE were less likely to achieve underwater competencies (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The disparity between parent and child perspectives of NPAE demonstrates the importance of considering both perspectives. This should assist in providing appropriate support for children to develop aquatic competencies. SO WHAT?: Using NPAE data, practitioners can customise swim teaching approaches to address and prevent NPAE, particularly as many children associate their NPAE with pools, the common setting for aquatic education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue addressed: Achieving aquatic competence is recommended for preventing childhood drownings, yet many children in Victoria, Australia do not meet aquatic benchmarks despite participating in swimming and water safety programs. While few studies have explored factors influencing aquatic competency development, negative prior aquatic experiences (NPAE) have surfaced as a potential influence. Research on children's NPAE has primarily focused on parental perceptions rather than the child's actual experiences.

Methods: Parents and children (aged 10-12 years) completed reliable surveys for background information and NPAE-related data. Children also completed aquatic competency assessments against benchmark standards. Chi-square tests determined relationships between NPAE and aquatic competency, and thematic analysis categorised themes related to perceptions of the child's NPAE.

Results: Most parents (82.9%) indicated their child had not had NPAE, while only half (51.0%) of children did not report NPAE. Children reporting NPAE often perceived incidents as nearly drowning (41%), encompassing swimming pool environments and underwater submersion. Similarly, parents reported varied situations, noting NPAE involving open water and the child's loss of control. Parent-reported NPAE was associated with children less likely to achieve knowledge, continuous swimming, and survival competency benchmarks (p < .05). Children reporting NPAE were less likely to achieve underwater competencies (p < .05).

Conclusions: The disparity between parent and child perspectives of NPAE demonstrates the importance of considering both perspectives. This should assist in providing appropriate support for children to develop aquatic competencies. SO WHAT?: Using NPAE data, practitioners can customise swim teaching approaches to address and prevent NPAE, particularly as many children associate their NPAE with pools, the common setting for aquatic education.

先前的负面水上经验与儿童的水上能力:家长的看法与实际情况是否不同?
解决问题:为预防儿童溺水事故,我们建议要达到水上能力要求,然而,尽管澳大利亚维多利亚州的许多儿童参加了游泳和水上安全项目,他们的水上能力仍未达到基准。虽然很少有研究探讨影响水上能力发展的因素,但先前的负面水上经历(NPAE)已成为一个潜在的影响因素。有关儿童 NPAE 的研究主要集中在家长的看法上,而不是儿童的实际经历上:方法:家长和儿童(10-12 岁)完成可靠的背景信息和 NPAE 相关数据调查。儿童还根据基准标准完成了水上能力评估。通过卡方检验确定 NPAE 与水上能力之间的关系,并通过主题分析对与儿童 NPAE 感知相关的主题进行分类:大多数家长(82.9%)表示他们的孩子没有发生过 NPAE,而只有一半(51.0%)的孩子没有报告过 NPAE。报告非溺水事件的儿童通常认为事件几乎是溺水(41%),包括游泳池环境和水下浸泡。同样,家长报告的情况也不尽相同,他们指出 NPAE 涉及开放水域和儿童失去控制。家长报告的 NPAE 与儿童不太可能达到知识、连续游泳和生存能力基准有关(p 结论:家长和儿童的观点存在差异:家长和儿童对 NPAE 的看法存在差异,这说明考虑双方看法的重要性。这将有助于为儿童发展水上能力提供适当的支持。所以呢?利用 NPAE 数据,从业人员可以定制游泳教学方法,以解决和预防 NPAE,特别是许多儿童将他们的 NPAE 与泳池联系在一起,泳池是水上教育的常见场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信