Expectant Casualty Care Training Needs for Future Conflicts.

Abstract

Introduct ion: The demands of future large-scale combat operations may require medics and corpsmen to increasingly perform expectant casualty care (ECC). However, no detailed guidelines currently exist for providing ECC within military medicine. To guide the development of education and training guidelines and advance team training of both medics and non-medics, an in-depth understanding is first needed regarding caregivers' experiences providing ECC in recent conflicts as well as perceived training gaps. Therefore, this study explored the experiences of medics and physicians providing ECC and investigated their perceptions of training needs in this area for future conflicts characterized by large-scale combat operations and prolonged casualty care operational settings.

Materials and methods: We conducted an engaged qualitative phenomenological study to explore ECC training needs for future conflicts. We interviewed 9 senior health care professionals (medics and physicians) who had extensive combat and deployment experiences and served primarily in the Role 1 environment. The interviews averaged 45 min each and were conducted via phone. To analyze this interview data, we reviewed the interview transcripts and then noted terms, phrases, and concepts within the interview transcripts that we found to be salient to answering the research question. Our team then met to review these codes and grouped them into categories. These categories served as the themes of this study that illustrated the participants' perceptions and experiences.

Results: Five themes emerged from our data: (1) There is a current gap in ECC training for enlisted Role 1 caregivers throughout the military; (2) ECC training is needed to shift organizational culture; (3) ECC training should be comprehensive; (4) ECC training should be deliberate; and (5) Time is the greatest challenge to implementing ECC training. Our participants noted that developing guidelines and filling training gaps is not only critical for preparing Role 1 providers for effective and ethical military medical decision-making but also for addressing death and dying on the battlefield and building moral resilience across the medical corps.

Conclusion: Our results provide direction for development of ECC clinical guidance and collective team training recommendations. Following these guidelines may increase life-saving capabilities on the far-forward battlefield and equip medical directors and medics to provide ethical and compassionate care to those who cannot be saved in the setting of limited resources and evacuation opportunities.