Development and validation of the Unmet Needs Questionnaire for young stroke survivors.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1177/02692155241270968
Wen-Yu Kuo, Chen-Yin Chen, Ting-Yu Chang, Jeng Wang, Chin-Man Wang, Pei-Kwei Tsay
{"title":"Development and validation of the Unmet Needs Questionnaire for young stroke survivors.","authors":"Wen-Yu Kuo, Chen-Yin Chen, Ting-Yu Chang, Jeng Wang, Chin-Man Wang, Pei-Kwei Tsay","doi":"10.1177/02692155241270968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Owing to the lack of a suitable tool for detecting the unmet needs of young stroke survivors, this study aims to develop a validated questionnaire for evaluating these unmet needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, observational research design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou and Taoyuan branches in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 211 participants (average age 53 years; within 6 months post-stroke) completed the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>A qualitative approach was used to create an item pool. Experts verified item suitability, and content validity was evaluated using the item content validity index. Item analysis was applied to determine item quality, and factor analysis was used to explore construct validity. In addition, parallel analysis was employed to ascertain the optimal number of factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale development procedure resulted in a 27-item questionnaire that assesses the unmet needs of young stroke survivors after a stroke. The item content validity index was 1.0. The Unmet Needs Questionnaire has five factors: restoring prestroke abilities and life, rehabilitation-related resources, social support and self-adjustment, economic and post-stroke life adjustment, and stroke-related information. These five factors accounted for 54% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.91, while the alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Unmet Needs Questionnaire showed acceptable reliability and validity. It can help clinical professionals and government agencies identify stroke survivors' unmet needs and develop tailored care plans. Future research should explore the trajectory of post-stroke unmet needs using this tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1362-1371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241270968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Owing to the lack of a suitable tool for detecting the unmet needs of young stroke survivors, this study aims to develop a validated questionnaire for evaluating these unmet needs.

Design: A cross-sectional, observational research design.

Setting: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou and Taoyuan branches in Taiwan.

Participants: A total of 211 participants (average age 53 years; within 6 months post-stroke) completed the questionnaire.

Main measures: A qualitative approach was used to create an item pool. Experts verified item suitability, and content validity was evaluated using the item content validity index. Item analysis was applied to determine item quality, and factor analysis was used to explore construct validity. In addition, parallel analysis was employed to ascertain the optimal number of factors.

Results: The scale development procedure resulted in a 27-item questionnaire that assesses the unmet needs of young stroke survivors after a stroke. The item content validity index was 1.0. The Unmet Needs Questionnaire has five factors: restoring prestroke abilities and life, rehabilitation-related resources, social support and self-adjustment, economic and post-stroke life adjustment, and stroke-related information. These five factors accounted for 54% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.91, while the alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.88.

Conclusions: The Unmet Needs Questionnaire showed acceptable reliability and validity. It can help clinical professionals and government agencies identify stroke survivors' unmet needs and develop tailored care plans. Future research should explore the trajectory of post-stroke unmet needs using this tool.

针对年轻中风幸存者的 "未满足需求问卷 "的开发与验证。
摘要由于缺乏一个合适的工具来检测年轻脑卒中幸存者未得到满足的需求,本研究旨在开发一个有效的问卷来评估这些未得到满足的需求:设计:横断面观察研究设计:研究地点:台湾长庚纪念医院林口分院和桃园分院:共有 211 名参与者(平均年龄 53 岁,卒中后 6 个月内)完成了问卷调查:采用定性方法创建项目库。专家验证了项目的适用性,并使用项目内容效度指数评估了内容效度。项目分析用于确定项目质量,因子分析用于探讨构建有效性。此外,还采用了平行分析来确定因子的最佳数量:结果:量表开发过程产生了一份 27 个项目的问卷,用于评估中风后年轻幸存者未满足的需求。项目内容效度指数为 1.0。未满足需求问卷有五个因子:恢复卒中前的能力和生活、康复相关资源、社会支持和自我调整、经济和卒中后生活调整以及卒中相关信息。这五个因子占方差的 54%。总量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.91,分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.74 至 0.88:未满足需求问卷的信度和效度均可接受。结论:未满足需求问卷的信度和效度均可接受,有助于临床专业人员和政府机构识别卒中 幸存者未满足的需求并制定有针对性的护理计划。未来的研究应使用该工具探索卒中后未满足需求的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信