Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yun Wan, Linjuan Guo, Meimei Xiong
{"title":"Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yun Wan, Linjuan Guo, Meimei Xiong","doi":"10.1177/10760296241274750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since several studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), we conducted a meta-analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2024. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures to compare DOACs with VKAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 observational studies were included. The pooled analysis revealed that a trend towards higher complete recanalization rates with DOACs (71.4%) compared to VKAs (55.3%), though not statistically significant (OR 1.95; 95%CI 0.70 to 5.44). For SVT extension, a significant effect was observed favoring DOACs (OR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.54). No significant differences were found in other efficacy outcomes or safety outcomes, except for major bleeding, which was significantly lower with DOACs (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOACs are superior to VKAs in SVT extension and major bleeding, suggesting that DOACs may be a favorable treatment option in the treatment of SVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241274750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since several studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), we conducted a meta-analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2024. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures to compare DOACs with VKAs.

Results: A total of 9 observational studies were included. The pooled analysis revealed that a trend towards higher complete recanalization rates with DOACs (71.4%) compared to VKAs (55.3%), though not statistically significant (OR 1.95; 95%CI 0.70 to 5.44). For SVT extension, a significant effect was observed favoring DOACs (OR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.54). No significant differences were found in other efficacy outcomes or safety outcomes, except for major bleeding, which was significantly lower with DOACs (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.56).

Conclusion: DOACs are superior to VKAs in SVT extension and major bleeding, suggesting that DOACs may be a favorable treatment option in the treatment of SVT.

直接口服抗凝药对脾静脉血栓患者的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:由于已有多项研究探讨了直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在治疗脾静脉血栓(SVT)患者中的应用,因此我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估DOACs与维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)相比在该人群中的安全性和有效性:我们使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行了全面检索,检索期至 2024 年 6 月。我们使用几率比(ORs)和 95% 置信区间(CIs)作为效果测量指标来比较 DOACs 和 VKAs:结果:共纳入 9 项观察性研究。汇总分析显示,DOACs(71.4%)与 VKAs(55.3%)相比,有完全再通率更高的趋势,但无统计学意义(OR 1.95;95%CI 0.70 至 5.44)。在 SVT 延长方面,观察到 DOACs 有明显优势(OR 0.12;95%CI 0.03 至 0.54)。除大出血外,其他疗效或安全性结果均无明显差异,而DOACs的大出血率明显较低(OR 0.27;95%CI 0.13至0.56):结论:在 SVT 延长和大出血方面,DOACs 优于 VKAs,这表明 DOACs 可能是治疗 SVT 的有利选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信