Sara Gomez-Aguililla, Sergio Farrais, Natalia Lopez-Palacios, Beatriz Arau, Carla Senosiain, Maria Corzo, Nora Fernandez-Jimenez, Angela Ruiz-Carnicer, Fernando Fernandez-Bañares, Barbara P Gonzalez-Garcia, Eva Tristan, Ana Montero-Calle, Maria Garranzo-Asensio, Isabel Casado, Mar Pujals, Juana Maria Hernandez, Jorge Infante-Menendez, Garbiñe Roy, Carolina Sousa, Concepcion Nuñez
{"title":"Diagnosis of celiac disease on a gluten-free diet: a multicenter prospective quasi-experimental clinical study","authors":"Sara Gomez-Aguililla, Sergio Farrais, Natalia Lopez-Palacios, Beatriz Arau, Carla Senosiain, Maria Corzo, Nora Fernandez-Jimenez, Angela Ruiz-Carnicer, Fernando Fernandez-Bañares, Barbara P Gonzalez-Garcia, Eva Tristan, Ana Montero-Calle, Maria Garranzo-Asensio, Isabel Casado, Mar Pujals, Juana Maria Hernandez, Jorge Infante-Menendez, Garbiñe Roy, Carolina Sousa, Concepcion Nuñez","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nDiagnosing celiac disease (CD) in individuals adhering to a gluten-free diet (GFD) presents significant challenges. Current guidelines recommend a gluten challenge (GC) lasting at least 6-8 weeks, which has several limitations.\nObjectives\nThis study compares four approaches previously proposed for diagnosing CD on a GFD: IL-2 serum levels, gut-homing CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells, %TCRγδ<sup>+</sup> intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), and UBE2L3 gene expression. Additionally, we evaluated the CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell based method with a 3-day GC against the standard GC protocol. Methods\nWe conducted a multicenter prospective quasi-experimental clinical study. Two subsets of individuals were considered: 1) 20 patients with CD and 15 non-CD controls previously diagnosed, to evaluate the first aim; 2) 45 individuals with uncertain diagnosis who were on a GFD and required GC following current clinical guidelines, to assess the second aim. All participants underwent a 3-day GC (10 g gluten/day).\nResults\nAmong CD patients and non-CD controls, the sensitivity and specificity of IL-2, gut-homing CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells, and UBE2L3 were 82.4% and 83.3%, 88.2% and 100%, and 52.9% and 100%, respectively. The percentage of TCRγδ<sup>+</sup> IELs showed 88.2% sensitivity. In the uncertain diagnosis group, a CD8+ T-cell positive response was observed in 8 of the 45 subjects. Conclusion\nThe percentage of TCRγδ<sup>+</sup> IELs and the gut-homing CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell assay are promising diagnostic methods for CD on a GFD. Notably, the CD8+ T-cell assay provides a consistent and reliable alternative to the extended GC, eliminating the need for the invasive procedures to obtain duodenal samples and the prolonged gluten ingestion.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Diagnosing celiac disease (CD) in individuals adhering to a gluten-free diet (GFD) presents significant challenges. Current guidelines recommend a gluten challenge (GC) lasting at least 6-8 weeks, which has several limitations.
Objectives
This study compares four approaches previously proposed for diagnosing CD on a GFD: IL-2 serum levels, gut-homing CD8+ T cells, %TCRγδ+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), and UBE2L3 gene expression. Additionally, we evaluated the CD8+ T-cell based method with a 3-day GC against the standard GC protocol. Methods
We conducted a multicenter prospective quasi-experimental clinical study. Two subsets of individuals were considered: 1) 20 patients with CD and 15 non-CD controls previously diagnosed, to evaluate the first aim; 2) 45 individuals with uncertain diagnosis who were on a GFD and required GC following current clinical guidelines, to assess the second aim. All participants underwent a 3-day GC (10 g gluten/day).
Results
Among CD patients and non-CD controls, the sensitivity and specificity of IL-2, gut-homing CD8+ T cells, and UBE2L3 were 82.4% and 83.3%, 88.2% and 100%, and 52.9% and 100%, respectively. The percentage of TCRγδ+ IELs showed 88.2% sensitivity. In the uncertain diagnosis group, a CD8+ T-cell positive response was observed in 8 of the 45 subjects. Conclusion
The percentage of TCRγδ+ IELs and the gut-homing CD8+ T-cell assay are promising diagnostic methods for CD on a GFD. Notably, the CD8+ T-cell assay provides a consistent and reliable alternative to the extended GC, eliminating the need for the invasive procedures to obtain duodenal samples and the prolonged gluten ingestion.