D. Iluz-Freundlich , Y. Vikhorova , K. Azem , S. Fein , P. Chernov , N. Schamroth-Pravda , A. Shmueli , O. Houri , P. Heesen , M. Garren-Tam , Y. Binyamin , S. Orbach-Zinger
{"title":"Peripartum anesthesia management and outcomes of patients with congenital heart disease: a single-center retrospective analysis (2009–2023)","authors":"D. Iluz-Freundlich , Y. Vikhorova , K. Azem , S. Fein , P. Chernov , N. Schamroth-Pravda , A. Shmueli , O. Houri , P. Heesen , M. Garren-Tam , Y. Binyamin , S. Orbach-Zinger","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Advances in medicine have enabled more patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) to become pregnant. However, these patients face significant challenges during the peripartum period. Current peripartum anesthesia guidelines for CHD patients mainly rely on case reports and small series.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study at a high-volume tertiary care center, we analyzed peripartum anesthetic approaches, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) incidence, and maternal outcomes in CHD patients stratified by the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 85 473 deliveries between 2009 and 2023, 409 occurred in 282 patients with CHD. Cesarean deliveries were significantly more frequent in mWHO class III, <em>p</em>=0.005. Labor epidural analgesia was the most common analgesic modality for vaginal deliveries (epidural rate was 71.1% with no differences between mWHO classes). Anesthesia management for cesarean deliveries varied significantly by class <em>p</em><0.001. While spinal anesthesia was predominant in classes I and II, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was more common in class III. PPH incidence was 6.4%, with no significant difference across classes, and no association was found between mWHO class severity and PPH risk (OR 0.97; 95% CI; 0.93 to 1.02, <em>p</em>=0.2). Higher mWHO classes correlated with significantly higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, longer hospital stays, and one-year cardiac hospitalizations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this retrospective study on the peripartum anesthetic management and outcomes of CHD patients stratified by mWHO class, cases with greater mWHO class were more likely to deliver preterm, by cesarean delivery, with a combined spinal-epidural anesthetic and an arterial line placement for that cesarean delivery. They overall had a longer hospital stay and were more likely to be admitted to the ICU. However, the overall risk of PPH did not increase with mWHO class severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X2400253X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Advances in medicine have enabled more patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) to become pregnant. However, these patients face significant challenges during the peripartum period. Current peripartum anesthesia guidelines for CHD patients mainly rely on case reports and small series.
Methods
In this retrospective study at a high-volume tertiary care center, we analyzed peripartum anesthetic approaches, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) incidence, and maternal outcomes in CHD patients stratified by the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) classification.
Results
Among 85 473 deliveries between 2009 and 2023, 409 occurred in 282 patients with CHD. Cesarean deliveries were significantly more frequent in mWHO class III, p=0.005. Labor epidural analgesia was the most common analgesic modality for vaginal deliveries (epidural rate was 71.1% with no differences between mWHO classes). Anesthesia management for cesarean deliveries varied significantly by class p<0.001. While spinal anesthesia was predominant in classes I and II, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was more common in class III. PPH incidence was 6.4%, with no significant difference across classes, and no association was found between mWHO class severity and PPH risk (OR 0.97; 95% CI; 0.93 to 1.02, p=0.2). Higher mWHO classes correlated with significantly higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, longer hospital stays, and one-year cardiac hospitalizations.
Conclusion
In this retrospective study on the peripartum anesthetic management and outcomes of CHD patients stratified by mWHO class, cases with greater mWHO class were more likely to deliver preterm, by cesarean delivery, with a combined spinal-epidural anesthetic and an arterial line placement for that cesarean delivery. They overall had a longer hospital stay and were more likely to be admitted to the ICU. However, the overall risk of PPH did not increase with mWHO class severity.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.