Embodied carbon saving potential of using recycled materials as cement substitute in Singapore’s buildings

Zheyuan Zhang, Ying Lei, J. Y. Richard Liew, Mi Liu, Gloria Wong, Hongjian Du
{"title":"Embodied carbon saving potential of using recycled materials as cement substitute in Singapore’s buildings","authors":"Zheyuan Zhang, Ying Lei, J. Y. Richard Liew, Mi Liu, Gloria Wong, Hongjian Du","doi":"10.1038/s44296-024-00032-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Material production and construction activities are key contributors to global carbon footprints, necessitating sustainable alternatives. This study aims to investigate the potential of integrating recycled materials as Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) in concrete production to mitigate the substantial carbon emissions of Singapore’s building and construction sector. The research focuses on Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBFS), waste glass powder, and calcined marine clay as alternative SCMs, aiming to reduce environmental impact and waste disposal emissions in Singapore. Employing a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for 1 m3 of concrete with different grades, this study quantifies embodied carbon savings and assesses the feasibility of substituting these SCMs in concrete. The results reveal that substituting Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with GGBFS in concrete offers the most significant reduction, up to 56%, in 1 m3 of concrete. In contrast, the use of calcined marine clay and glass powder in concrete results in reductions of up to 21% and 16%, respectively. Two case studies were used to exemplify the impact of using SCM concrete at the project scale. Results indicate that up to 31% of the total embodied carbon could be saved in the building. Additionally, scenario analysis suggests that the total emissions from cementitious materials in Singapore could decrease by 20% through the incorporation of locally recycled marine clay and glass powder. This reduction could potentially reach 56% if the GGBFS supply is not constrained. To further enhance sustainability in Singapore’s construction sector, the study proposes sourcing GGBFS from neighboring countries to minimize transportation emissions and localizing the production and usage of calcined marine clay and glass powder. These measures can improve material circularity and significantly contribute to achieving carbon reduction targets.","PeriodicalId":471646,"journal":{"name":"npj Materials Sustainability","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44296-024-00032-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Materials Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44296-024-00032-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Material production and construction activities are key contributors to global carbon footprints, necessitating sustainable alternatives. This study aims to investigate the potential of integrating recycled materials as Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) in concrete production to mitigate the substantial carbon emissions of Singapore’s building and construction sector. The research focuses on Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBFS), waste glass powder, and calcined marine clay as alternative SCMs, aiming to reduce environmental impact and waste disposal emissions in Singapore. Employing a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for 1 m3 of concrete with different grades, this study quantifies embodied carbon savings and assesses the feasibility of substituting these SCMs in concrete. The results reveal that substituting Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with GGBFS in concrete offers the most significant reduction, up to 56%, in 1 m3 of concrete. In contrast, the use of calcined marine clay and glass powder in concrete results in reductions of up to 21% and 16%, respectively. Two case studies were used to exemplify the impact of using SCM concrete at the project scale. Results indicate that up to 31% of the total embodied carbon could be saved in the building. Additionally, scenario analysis suggests that the total emissions from cementitious materials in Singapore could decrease by 20% through the incorporation of locally recycled marine clay and glass powder. This reduction could potentially reach 56% if the GGBFS supply is not constrained. To further enhance sustainability in Singapore’s construction sector, the study proposes sourcing GGBFS from neighboring countries to minimize transportation emissions and localizing the production and usage of calcined marine clay and glass powder. These measures can improve material circularity and significantly contribute to achieving carbon reduction targets.

Abstract Image

新加坡建筑使用再生材料作为水泥替代品的内含碳减排潜力
材料生产和建筑活动是造成全球碳足迹的主要因素,因此需要可持续的替代品。本研究旨在探讨在混凝土生产中采用回收材料作为补充胶凝材料(SCM)的潜力,以减少新加坡建筑业的大量碳排放。研究的重点是将磨细高炉矿渣(GGBFS)、废玻璃粉和煅烧海粘土作为替代性 SCM,旨在减少新加坡的环境影响和废物处置排放。本研究采用 "从摇篮到终点 "的生命周期评估(LCA)方法,对 1 立方米不同等级的混凝土进行了量化,计算了所体现的碳减排量,并评估了在混凝土中使用这些 SCM 替代品的可行性。研究结果表明,在 1 立方米的混凝土中,用 GGBFS 替代普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)的减排效果最为显著,最高可达 56%。相比之下,在混凝土中使用煅烧海粘土和玻璃粉可分别减少 21% 和 16%。通过两个案例研究,说明了在项目规模上使用 SCM 混凝土的影响。研究结果表明,建筑物可节省高达 31% 的内含碳总量。此外,情景分析表明,通过采用当地回收的海泥和玻璃粉,新加坡水泥基材料的总排放量可减少 20%。如果 GGBFS 的供应不受限制,这一减排量有可能达到 56%。为进一步提高新加坡建筑行业的可持续性,研究建议从邻国采购 GGBFS,以尽量减少运输排放,并将煅烧海粘土和玻璃粉的生产和使用本地化。这些措施可以提高材料的循环性,并大大有助于实现碳减排目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信