Longitudinal Relationship between Cognitive Decline and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults Based on the Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Guangming Li, Xin Xie
{"title":"Longitudinal Relationship between Cognitive Decline and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults Based on the Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model","authors":"Guangming Li,&nbsp;Xin Xie","doi":"10.1155/2024/7312477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Objective</i>. This study used a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) to explore the longitudinal relationship between cognitive function (CF) and subjective well-being (SWB) for older adults and investigate if older adults with cognitive decline can be happy. Older adults were divided into two groups according to gender, and the effect of gender with different groups on CF and SWB was discussed. The effects of age, marital status, self-rated health, exercise, and education level on the CF and SWB were investigated. <i>Methods</i>. This study adopted a longitudinal design and selected 4,672 older adults from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which spanned 3 time points from 2008 to 2014 (<i>N</i> = 4,672). The mean age was 78.18 years (SD = 9.75, range = 61–111) and 2,238 (47.9%) were males. The CF was measured using the cognitive function scale, and the SWB was measured using 6 questions related to positive and negative emotions from CLHLS. <i>Results</i>. (1) The chi-square difference test between the two models further showed that the RI-CLPM fitted data significantly better than traditional CLPM (∆<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> (3) = 203.656, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The RI-CLPM was more suitable for this study than the CLPM. (2) This study examined whether the relationship between CF and SWB for older adults was bidirectional or unidirectional. The article only partially supported them, which indicates that including the gender role was successful. (3) Self-rated health, exercise, and education level had a significant positive impact on both CF and SWB. The only distinguishable factor that affects CF between males and females is the marital status. The effect for female CF is not significant (<i>β</i> = −0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.961), but the effect for male CF is significant (<i>β</i> = −0.146, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). <i>Conclusion</i>. Gender discrimination is necessary to better understand the impact of cognitive decline on SWB. Female older adults with cognitive decline could be happy, but male older adults could not. Male CF is more affected by marital status than females. It is more important to care about the cognitive decline of unmarried male older adults. Older age and unmarried males are risk factors for older adults, but better self-rated health, more regular exercise, and continuous learning are the protective factors for older adults. These risk factors need to be prevented and these protective factors should be strengthened.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7312477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7312477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. This study used a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) to explore the longitudinal relationship between cognitive function (CF) and subjective well-being (SWB) for older adults and investigate if older adults with cognitive decline can be happy. Older adults were divided into two groups according to gender, and the effect of gender with different groups on CF and SWB was discussed. The effects of age, marital status, self-rated health, exercise, and education level on the CF and SWB were investigated. Methods. This study adopted a longitudinal design and selected 4,672 older adults from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which spanned 3 time points from 2008 to 2014 (N = 4,672). The mean age was 78.18 years (SD = 9.75, range = 61–111) and 2,238 (47.9%) were males. The CF was measured using the cognitive function scale, and the SWB was measured using 6 questions related to positive and negative emotions from CLHLS. Results. (1) The chi-square difference test between the two models further showed that the RI-CLPM fitted data significantly better than traditional CLPM (∆χ2 (3) = 203.656, p < 0.001). The RI-CLPM was more suitable for this study than the CLPM. (2) This study examined whether the relationship between CF and SWB for older adults was bidirectional or unidirectional. The article only partially supported them, which indicates that including the gender role was successful. (3) Self-rated health, exercise, and education level had a significant positive impact on both CF and SWB. The only distinguishable factor that affects CF between males and females is the marital status. The effect for female CF is not significant (β = −0.001, p = 0.961), but the effect for male CF is significant (β = −0.146, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Gender discrimination is necessary to better understand the impact of cognitive decline on SWB. Female older adults with cognitive decline could be happy, but male older adults could not. Male CF is more affected by marital status than females. It is more important to care about the cognitive decline of unmarried male older adults. Older age and unmarried males are risk factors for older adults, but better self-rated health, more regular exercise, and continuous learning are the protective factors for older adults. These risk factors need to be prevented and these protective factors should be strengthened.

Abstract Image

基于随机截距交叉滞后面板模型的老年人认知能力下降与主观幸福感之间的纵向关系
研究目的本研究采用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型(RI-CLPM)探讨老年人认知功能(CF)与主观幸福感(SWB)之间的纵向关系,并研究认知功能衰退的老年人是否会感到幸福。研究将老年人按性别分为两组,讨论了不同组别的性别对认知功能和主观幸福感的影响。研究还探讨了年龄、婚姻状况、自评健康状况、运动量和教育水平对 CF 和 SWB 的影响。研究方法本研究采用纵向设计,从中国健康长寿纵向调查(CLHLS)中选取了 4 672 名老年人,时间跨度为 2008 年至 2014 年(N = 4 672)。平均年龄为 78.18 岁(SD = 9.75,范围 = 61-111),男性 2,238 人(47.9%)。CF采用认知功能量表进行测量,SWB采用CLHLS中与积极和消极情绪相关的6个问题进行测量。结果如下(1)两种模型的卡方差异检验进一步表明,RI-CLPM的数据拟合效果明显优于传统的CLPM(Δχ2 (3) = 203.656, p < 0.001)。与 CLPM 相比,RI-CLPM 更适合本研究。(2) 该研究探讨了老年人 CF 与 SWB 之间的关系是双向的还是单向的。文章仅部分支持了他们的观点,这表明纳入性别角色是成功的。(3)自评健康、运动和教育水平对 CF 和 SWB 都有显著的积极影响。影响男性和女性 CF 的唯一可区分因素是婚姻状况。对女性 CF 的影响不显著(β = -0.001,p = 0.961),但对男性 CF 的影响显著(β = -0.146,p <0.001)。结论要更好地理解认知能力下降对社会工作能力的影响,性别歧视是必要的。认知能力下降的女性老年人可能会感到幸福,但男性老年人则不会。男性 CF 受婚姻状况的影响比女性更大。关注未婚男性老年人的认知衰退更为重要。高龄和未婚男性是老年人的风险因素,但自我健康状况较好、经常锻炼和持续学习是老年人的保护因素。这些风险因素需要预防,这些保护因素应该加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信