Enhanced head and neck radiotherapy target definition through multidisciplinary delineation and peer review: A prospective single-center study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
{"title":"Enhanced head and neck radiotherapy target definition through multidisciplinary delineation and peer review: A prospective single-center study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the benefit of weekly delineation and peer review by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of radiation oncologists (ROs), radiologists (RXs), and nuclear medicine (NM) physicians in defining primary and lymph node tumor volumes (GTVp and GTVn) for head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy.</p><p>This study includes 30 consecutive HNC patients referred for definitive curative (chemo)-radiotherapy. Imaging data including head and neck MRI, [18F]-FDG-PET and<!--> <!-->CT scan were evaluated by the MDT. The RO identified the ’undeniable’ tumor as GTVp_core and determined GTVp_max, representing the maximum tumoral volume. The MDT delineation (MDT-D) by RX and NM physicians outlined their respective primary GTVs (GTVp_RX and GTVp_NM). During the MDT meeting (MDT-M), these contours were discussed to reach a consensus on the final primary GTV (GTVp_final). In the comparative analysis of various GTVp delineations, we performed descriptive statistics and assessed two MDT-M factors: 1) the added value of MDT-M, which includes the section of GTVp_final outside GTVp_core but within GTVp_RX or GTVp_NM, and 2) the part of GTVp_final that deviates from GTVp_max, representing the area missed by the RO. For GTVn, discussions evaluated lymph node extent and malignancy, documenting findings and the frequency of disagreements.</p><p>The average GTVp core and max volumes were 19.5 cc (range: 0.4–90.1) and 22.1 cc (range: 0.8–106.2), respectively. Compared to GTVp_core, MDT-D to GTVp_final added an average of 3.3 cc (range: 0–25.6) and spared an average of 1.3 cc (0–15.6). Compared to GTVp_max, MDT-D and -M added an average of 2.7 cc (range: 0–20.3) and removed 2.3 cc (0–21.3). The most frequent GTVn discussions included morphologically suspicious nodes not fixing on [18F]-FDG-PET and small [18F]-FDG-PET negative retropharyngeal lymph nodes.</p><p>Multidisciplinary review of target contours in HNC is essential for accurate treatment planning, ensuring precise tumor and lymph node delineation, potentially improving local control and reducing toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001149/pdfft?md5=a79022368448a9eff43c225cf066e4db&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001149-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the benefit of weekly delineation and peer review by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of radiation oncologists (ROs), radiologists (RXs), and nuclear medicine (NM) physicians in defining primary and lymph node tumor volumes (GTVp and GTVn) for head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy.

This study includes 30 consecutive HNC patients referred for definitive curative (chemo)-radiotherapy. Imaging data including head and neck MRI, [18F]-FDG-PET and CT scan were evaluated by the MDT. The RO identified the ’undeniable’ tumor as GTVp_core and determined GTVp_max, representing the maximum tumoral volume. The MDT delineation (MDT-D) by RX and NM physicians outlined their respective primary GTVs (GTVp_RX and GTVp_NM). During the MDT meeting (MDT-M), these contours were discussed to reach a consensus on the final primary GTV (GTVp_final). In the comparative analysis of various GTVp delineations, we performed descriptive statistics and assessed two MDT-M factors: 1) the added value of MDT-M, which includes the section of GTVp_final outside GTVp_core but within GTVp_RX or GTVp_NM, and 2) the part of GTVp_final that deviates from GTVp_max, representing the area missed by the RO. For GTVn, discussions evaluated lymph node extent and malignancy, documenting findings and the frequency of disagreements.

The average GTVp core and max volumes were 19.5 cc (range: 0.4–90.1) and 22.1 cc (range: 0.8–106.2), respectively. Compared to GTVp_core, MDT-D to GTVp_final added an average of 3.3 cc (range: 0–25.6) and spared an average of 1.3 cc (0–15.6). Compared to GTVp_max, MDT-D and -M added an average of 2.7 cc (range: 0–20.3) and removed 2.3 cc (0–21.3). The most frequent GTVn discussions included morphologically suspicious nodes not fixing on [18F]-FDG-PET and small [18F]-FDG-PET negative retropharyngeal lymph nodes.

Multidisciplinary review of target contours in HNC is essential for accurate treatment planning, ensuring precise tumor and lymph node delineation, potentially improving local control and reducing toxicity.

通过多学科划定和同行评审加强头颈部放疗靶点定义:前瞻性单中心研究
本研究评估了由放射肿瘤专家(RO)、放射科专家(RX)和核医学专家(NM)组成的多学科团队(MDT)每周划定和同行评审在确定头颈癌(HNC)放疗的原发和淋巴结肿瘤体积(GTVp 和 GTVn)方面的益处。MDT对包括头颈部MRI、[18F]-FDG-PET和CT扫描在内的成像数据进行了评估。RO将 "不可否认 "的肿瘤确定为GTVp_core,并确定了代表最大肿瘤体积的GTVp_max。RX 和 NM 医生的 MDT 划分(MDT-D)列出了各自的主要 GTV(GTVp_RX 和 GTVp_NM)。在 MDT 会议(MDT-M)上,对这些轮廓进行讨论,以就最终的主要 GTV(GTVp_final)达成共识。在对各种 GTVp 划分进行比较分析时,我们进行了描述性统计并评估了两个 MDT-M 因素:1)MDT-M 的附加值,包括 GTVp_final 在 GTVp_core 以外但在 GTVp_RX 或 GTVp_NM 范围内的部分;2)GTVp_final 偏离 GTVp_max 的部分,代表 RO 遗漏的区域。对于 GTVn,讨论评估了淋巴结范围和恶性程度,记录了结果和出现分歧的频率。GTVp 核心和最大体积的平均值分别为 19.5 毫升(范围:0.4-90.1)和 22.1 毫升(范围:0.8-106.2)。与 GTVp_core 相比,MDT-D 到 GTVp_final 平均增加了 3.3 毫升(范围:0-25.6),平均减少了 1.3 毫升(0-15.6)。与 GTVp_max 相比,MDT-D 和 -M 平均增加 2.7 cc(范围:0-20.3),切除 2.3 cc(0-21.3)。最常讨论的 GTVn 包括[18F]-FDG-PET 未定形的形态学可疑结节和[18F]-FDG-PET 阴性的咽后小淋巴结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信