Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nicola Lambri , Damiano Dei , Giulia Goretti , Leonardo Crespi , Ricardo Coimbra Brioso , Marco Pelizzoli , Sara Parabicoli , Andrea Bresolin , Pasqualina Gallo , Francesco La Fauci , Francesca Lobefalo , Lucia Paganini , Giacomo Reggiori , Daniele Loiacono , Ciro Franzese , Stefano Tomatis , Marta Scorsetti , Pietro Mancosu
{"title":"Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans","authors":"Nicola Lambri ,&nbsp;Damiano Dei ,&nbsp;Giulia Goretti ,&nbsp;Leonardo Crespi ,&nbsp;Ricardo Coimbra Brioso ,&nbsp;Marco Pelizzoli ,&nbsp;Sara Parabicoli ,&nbsp;Andrea Bresolin ,&nbsp;Pasqualina Gallo ,&nbsp;Francesco La Fauci ,&nbsp;Francesca Lobefalo ,&nbsp;Lucia Paganini ,&nbsp;Giacomo Reggiori ,&nbsp;Daniele Loiacono ,&nbsp;Ciro Franzese ,&nbsp;Stefano Tomatis ,&nbsp;Marta Scorsetti ,&nbsp;Pietro Mancosu","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Radiotherapy plans with excessive complexity exhibit higher uncertainties and worse patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results, while the workload of measurement-based PSQA can impact the efficiency of the radiotherapy workflow. Machine Learning (ML) and Lean Six Sigma, a process optimization method, were implemented to adopt a targeted PSQA approach, aiming to reduce workload, risk of failures, and monitor complexity.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Lean Six Sigma was applied using DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) steps. Ten complexity metrics were computed for 69,811 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs from 28,612 plans delivered in our Institute (2013–2021). Outlier complexities were defined as &gt;95th-percentile of the historical distributions, stratified by treatment. An ML model was trained to predict the gamma passing rate (GPR-3 %/1mm) of an arc given its complexity. A decision support system was developed to monitor the complexity and expected GPR. Plans at risk of PSQA failure, either extremely complex or with average GPR &lt;90 %, were identified. The tool’s impact was assessed after nine months of clinical use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1722 VMAT plans monitored prospectively, 29 (1.7 %) were found at risk of failure. Planners reacted by performing PSQA measurement and re-optimizing the plan. Occurrences of outlier complexities remained stable within 5 %. The expected GPR increased from a median of 97.4 % to 98.2 % (Mann-Whitney p &lt; 0.05) due to plan re-optimization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ML and Lean Six Sigma have been implemented in clinical practice enabling a targeted measurement-based PSQA approach for plans at risk of failure to improve overall quality and patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000873/pdfft?md5=97f18d2b09662feebc335b8b11e5294b&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000873-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Radiotherapy plans with excessive complexity exhibit higher uncertainties and worse patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results, while the workload of measurement-based PSQA can impact the efficiency of the radiotherapy workflow. Machine Learning (ML) and Lean Six Sigma, a process optimization method, were implemented to adopt a targeted PSQA approach, aiming to reduce workload, risk of failures, and monitor complexity.

Materials and methods

Lean Six Sigma was applied using DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) steps. Ten complexity metrics were computed for 69,811 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs from 28,612 plans delivered in our Institute (2013–2021). Outlier complexities were defined as >95th-percentile of the historical distributions, stratified by treatment. An ML model was trained to predict the gamma passing rate (GPR-3 %/1mm) of an arc given its complexity. A decision support system was developed to monitor the complexity and expected GPR. Plans at risk of PSQA failure, either extremely complex or with average GPR <90 %, were identified. The tool’s impact was assessed after nine months of clinical use.

Results

Among 1722 VMAT plans monitored prospectively, 29 (1.7 %) were found at risk of failure. Planners reacted by performing PSQA measurement and re-optimizing the plan. Occurrences of outlier complexities remained stable within 5 %. The expected GPR increased from a median of 97.4 % to 98.2 % (Mann-Whitney p < 0.05) due to plan re-optimization.

Conclusions

ML and Lean Six Sigma have been implemented in clinical practice enabling a targeted measurement-based PSQA approach for plans at risk of failure to improve overall quality and patient safety.

利用机器学习和精益六西格玛技术,为特定患者提供有针对性的容积调制弧治疗计划质量保证
背景和目的放疗计划如果过于复杂,就会表现出更高的不确定性和更差的患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)结果,而基于测量的 PSQA 的工作量会影响放疗工作流程的效率。通过机器学习(ML)和精益六西格玛(一种流程优化方法),我们采用了一种有针对性的 PSQA 方法,旨在减少工作量、降低失败风险并监控复杂性。对本研究所(2013-2021 年)交付的 28,612 个计划中的 69,811 个容积调制弧治疗(VMAT)弧计算了十个复杂度指标。离群复杂度被定义为历史分布的第 95 百分位数,并按治疗方法进行分层。对一个 ML 模型进行了训练,以预测弧线复杂度的伽马通过率(GPR-3 %/1mm)。还开发了一个决策支持系统,用于监控复杂性和预期 GPR。确定了可能导致 PSQA 失败的计划,这些计划要么极其复杂,要么平均 GPR 为 90%。结果在前瞻性监测的 1722 个 VMAT 计划中,发现 29 个计划(1.7%)存在失败风险。计划人员采取的应对措施是进行 PSQA 测量并重新优化计划。异常复杂性的发生率稳定在 5%以内。由于重新优化了计划,预期的 GPR 从中位数 97.4% 提高到 98.2%(Mann-Whitney p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信