Assessing performance and disparities in China’s land finance transition: Insights from neo-liberalism and neo-Marxism

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
{"title":"Assessing performance and disparities in China’s land finance transition: Insights from neo-liberalism and neo-Marxism","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The overreliance of local governments on land finance has resulted in a series of problems in China, which call for the transition of land finance. While existing research focused on the risk and sustainability arising from land finance overreliance, an assessment of land finance transition performance is still lacking. Based on neo-liberalism and neo-Marxism theories, we proposed an analytical framework for assessing land finance transition considering market-government interplay. Based on this framework, we evaluated the performance of the market, government, and overall transition among 105 prefecture-level cities using land market data and governmental policy data. The results indicated that market-oriented transition performance declined gradually from the eastern cities to the western and northeastern cities. Government-led transition performance was still low in the central and northeastern cities. Overall, the land finance transition in eastern cities achieved positive progress, contrasting with the lagged progress in northeastern cities because of urban shrinkages and revenue shortages. We further reflected our analytical framework and empirical findings on land finance transition by integrating neoliberal and neo-Marxism approaches and market-state interplay, which can provide insights for the continual transition in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772400259X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overreliance of local governments on land finance has resulted in a series of problems in China, which call for the transition of land finance. While existing research focused on the risk and sustainability arising from land finance overreliance, an assessment of land finance transition performance is still lacking. Based on neo-liberalism and neo-Marxism theories, we proposed an analytical framework for assessing land finance transition considering market-government interplay. Based on this framework, we evaluated the performance of the market, government, and overall transition among 105 prefecture-level cities using land market data and governmental policy data. The results indicated that market-oriented transition performance declined gradually from the eastern cities to the western and northeastern cities. Government-led transition performance was still low in the central and northeastern cities. Overall, the land finance transition in eastern cities achieved positive progress, contrasting with the lagged progress in northeastern cities because of urban shrinkages and revenue shortages. We further reflected our analytical framework and empirical findings on land finance transition by integrating neoliberal and neo-Marxism approaches and market-state interplay, which can provide insights for the continual transition in the future.

评估中国土地财政转型的绩效和差距:新自由主义和新马克思主义的启示
在中国,地方政府对土地财政的过度依赖导致了一系列问题,土地财政转型迫在眉睫。现有研究主要关注土地财政过度依赖带来的风险和可持续性问题,但对土地财政转型绩效的评估仍然缺乏。基于新自由主义和新马克思主义理论,我们提出了一个考虑市场与政府相互作用的土地财政转型评估分析框架。在此框架基础上,我们利用土地市场数据和政府政策数据,对 105 个地级市的市场、政府和整体转型绩效进行了评估。结果表明,从东部城市到西部和东北部城市,市场导向的转型绩效逐渐下降。中部和东北部城市的政府主导型转型绩效仍然较低。总体而言,东部城市的土地财政转型取得了积极进展,而东北城市则由于城市萎缩和财政收入不足而进展滞后。我们通过整合新自由主义和新马克思主义方法以及市场与国家之间的相互作用,进一步反映了我们关于土地财政转型的分析框架和实证研究结果,从而为未来的持续转型提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信