Effect of post-mating GnRH or TAK-683 (Kisspeptin analog) treatment on the reproductive performance and serum progesterone concentration in ewes during the non-breeding season

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Gökhan Uyanık , Murat Abay , Ömer Orkun Demiral
{"title":"Effect of post-mating GnRH or TAK-683 (Kisspeptin analog) treatment on the reproductive performance and serum progesterone concentration in ewes during the non-breeding season","authors":"Gökhan Uyanık ,&nbsp;Murat Abay ,&nbsp;Ömer Orkun Demiral","doi":"10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study was designed to evaluate the effect of post-mating GnRH or TAK-683 (kisspeptin analog) treatment on serum progesterone (P<sub>4</sub>) concentrations and fertility parameters of ewes during the non-breeding season. One hundred and twenty multiparous, lactating Awassi ewes were used. For estrus synchronization, vaginal sponges containing 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) were inserted into the vagina and kept there for nine days. On the day of sponge removal (day 0), 500 IU of eCG and 75 µg of d-cloprostenol were given intramuscularly. Rams were introduced in the flock 24 h after sponge removal and kept with the ewes for 26 days, allowing a second mating period after synchronized estrus. On the fourth day after mating (day 6) the ewes mated by the rams between the 24th and 72nd hours (n = 105) were randomly divided into three groups. Control group (n = 36) received 1 ml of saline solution subcutaneously; GnRH group (n = 34) received 4 μg of buserelin acetate intramuscularly; TAK-683 group (n = 35) received 5 μg of TAK-683 acetate subcutaneously. Blood samples were taken to measure serum P<sub>4</sub> concentrations (ng/ml) at sponge insertion and on the 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 19th, 35th, and 50th days after sponge removal. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted via serum P<sub>4</sub> concentration measurement on the 19th day and transrectal ultrasonography on days 35 and 50. The results showed that GnRH treatment (4.823 ± 0.238; 2.151 ± 0.272) increased (P&lt;0.05) the mean P<sub>4</sub> concentration (ng/ml) in pregnant and non-pregnant ewes during the first mating period compared to Control (3.708 ± 0.207; 1.515 ± 0.164), while TAK-683 treatment (4.457 ± 0.181; 1.967 ± 0.213) was not different between groups. GnRH (58.82 %) and TAK-683 (42.10 %) treatments increased the pregnancy rate in the second mating period in comparison to the Control group (17.39 %) (P&lt;0.05). Cumulative pregnancy and fecundity rates were higher in GnRH (79.41 %; 120.58 %) and TAK-683 (68.57 %; 100.0 %) groups than in the Control group (17.39 %; 58.33 %) (P&lt;0.05). There was no difference in late embryonic loss rate among the groups (P&gt;0.05), whereas early fetal loss rate tended to be lower in the TAK-683 (0 %) and GnRH (0 %) groups than in the Control group (15.38 %) (P=0.07). The total pregnancy loss rate (from day 19 to day 50 post-mating) was lower in GnRH (0 %) and TAK-683 (0 %) groups relative to the Control group (21.42 %) (P&lt;0.05). There were no statistical differences among the groups in terms of the first mating period pregnancy rate, twinning rate, and litter size (P&gt;0.05). As a result, treatment with GnRH and TAK-683 on the fourth day after mating increased fecundity in lactating ewes outside the breeding season by preventing total pregnancy losses (from day 19 to day 50) and increasing second mating pregnancy rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21758,"journal":{"name":"Small Ruminant Research","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 107331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Ruminant Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of post-mating GnRH or TAK-683 (kisspeptin analog) treatment on serum progesterone (P4) concentrations and fertility parameters of ewes during the non-breeding season. One hundred and twenty multiparous, lactating Awassi ewes were used. For estrus synchronization, vaginal sponges containing 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) were inserted into the vagina and kept there for nine days. On the day of sponge removal (day 0), 500 IU of eCG and 75 µg of d-cloprostenol were given intramuscularly. Rams were introduced in the flock 24 h after sponge removal and kept with the ewes for 26 days, allowing a second mating period after synchronized estrus. On the fourth day after mating (day 6) the ewes mated by the rams between the 24th and 72nd hours (n = 105) were randomly divided into three groups. Control group (n = 36) received 1 ml of saline solution subcutaneously; GnRH group (n = 34) received 4 μg of buserelin acetate intramuscularly; TAK-683 group (n = 35) received 5 μg of TAK-683 acetate subcutaneously. Blood samples were taken to measure serum P4 concentrations (ng/ml) at sponge insertion and on the 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 19th, 35th, and 50th days after sponge removal. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted via serum P4 concentration measurement on the 19th day and transrectal ultrasonography on days 35 and 50. The results showed that GnRH treatment (4.823 ± 0.238; 2.151 ± 0.272) increased (P<0.05) the mean P4 concentration (ng/ml) in pregnant and non-pregnant ewes during the first mating period compared to Control (3.708 ± 0.207; 1.515 ± 0.164), while TAK-683 treatment (4.457 ± 0.181; 1.967 ± 0.213) was not different between groups. GnRH (58.82 %) and TAK-683 (42.10 %) treatments increased the pregnancy rate in the second mating period in comparison to the Control group (17.39 %) (P<0.05). Cumulative pregnancy and fecundity rates were higher in GnRH (79.41 %; 120.58 %) and TAK-683 (68.57 %; 100.0 %) groups than in the Control group (17.39 %; 58.33 %) (P<0.05). There was no difference in late embryonic loss rate among the groups (P>0.05), whereas early fetal loss rate tended to be lower in the TAK-683 (0 %) and GnRH (0 %) groups than in the Control group (15.38 %) (P=0.07). The total pregnancy loss rate (from day 19 to day 50 post-mating) was lower in GnRH (0 %) and TAK-683 (0 %) groups relative to the Control group (21.42 %) (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences among the groups in terms of the first mating period pregnancy rate, twinning rate, and litter size (P>0.05). As a result, treatment with GnRH and TAK-683 on the fourth day after mating increased fecundity in lactating ewes outside the breeding season by preventing total pregnancy losses (from day 19 to day 50) and increasing second mating pregnancy rates.

交配后GnRH或TAK-683(Kisspeptin类似物)对非繁殖期母羊繁殖性能和血清孕酮浓度的影响
本研究旨在评估交配后GnRH或TAK-683(kisspeptin类似物)治疗对非繁殖期母羊血清孕酮(P4)浓度和繁殖力参数的影响。研究对象为 120 只多胎泌乳阿瓦西母羊。为了同步发情,将含有 60 毫克醋酸甲羟孕酮(MAP)的阴道海绵塞入阴道,并保持九天。在取出海绵的当天(第 0 天),肌肉注射 500 IU eCG 和 75 µg d-氯前列醇。移除海绵 24 小时后,将公羊引入羊群,与母羊一起饲养 26 天,以便在同步发情后进行第二次交配。交配后第四天(第 6 天),在第 24 小时至第 72 小时之间由公羊交配的母羊(n = 105)被随机分为三组。对照组(n = 36)皮下注射1毫升生理盐水;GnRH组(n = 34)肌肉注射4微克醋酸丁螺环酮;TAK-683组(n = 35)皮下注射5微克醋酸TAK-683。在插入海绵时和取出海绵后的第6、9、12、15、19、35和50天抽取血样测量血清P4浓度(纳克/毫升)。妊娠诊断通过第 19 天的血清 P4 浓度测量和第 35 天和第 50 天的经直肠超声波检查进行。结果表明,与对照组(3.708 ± 0.207; 1.515 ± 0.164)相比,GnRH 处理(4.823 ± 0.238; 2.151 ± 0.272)提高了(P<0.05)妊娠母羊和非妊娠母羊在第一次交配期的平均 P4 浓度(ng/ml),而 TAK-683 处理(4.457 ± 0.181; 1.967 ± 0.213)在组间没有差异。与对照组(17.39%)相比,GnRH(58.82%)和TAK-683(42.10%)处理提高了第二交配期的妊娠率(P<0.05)。GnRH 组(79.41 %;120.58 %)和 TAK-683 组(68.57 %;100.0 %)的累积妊娠率和受胎率均高于对照组(17.39 %;58.33 %)(P<0.05)。各组的晚期胚胎损失率没有差异(P>0.05),而 TAK-683 组(0 %)和 GnRH 组(0 %)的早期胎儿损失率往往低于对照组(15.38 %)(P=0.07)。GnRH (0 %) 组和 TAK-683 (0 %) 组的总妊娠损失率(从交配后第 19 天到第 50 天)低于对照组(21.42 %)(P<0.05)。各组在初配期妊娠率、双胞胎率和产仔数方面没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。因此,在交配后第四天使用 GnRH 和 TAK-683 可防止总的妊娠损失(从第 19 天到第 50 天)并提高第二次交配的妊娠率,从而提高泌乳母羊在繁殖期外的受胎率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Small Ruminant Research
Small Ruminant Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Small Ruminant Research publishes original, basic and applied research articles, technical notes, and review articles on research relating to goats, sheep, deer, the New World camelids llama, alpaca, vicuna and guanaco, and the Old World camels. Topics covered include nutrition, physiology, anatomy, genetics, microbiology, ethology, product technology, socio-economics, management, sustainability and environment, veterinary medicine and husbandry engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信