Phase-field modelings of fracture investigate the influence of interfacial effects on damage and optimal material distribution in brittle inclusion-matrix structures

IF 3.2 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ba-Thanh Vu, Tien-Thanh Bui, Ngoc-Long Nguyen, The-Truyen Tran, Xuan-Lam Nguyen, Viet-Hai Hoang
{"title":"Phase-field modelings of fracture investigate the influence of interfacial effects on damage and optimal material distribution in brittle inclusion-matrix structures","authors":"Ba-Thanh Vu,&nbsp;Tien-Thanh Bui,&nbsp;Ngoc-Long Nguyen,&nbsp;The-Truyen Tran,&nbsp;Xuan-Lam Nguyen,&nbsp;Viet-Hai Hoang","doi":"10.1016/j.finmec.2024.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This present work uses the phase-field modelings to investigate the influence of interfacial effects on damage and mechanical behavior, as well as the optimal distribution of the inclusion shape within brittle inclusion-matrix structures in various typical cases. These two constituent phases in the structures are assumed to be either isotropic or anisotropic. To achieve these goals, this work will: (i) use the phase-field modelings either considering or neglecting interfacial debonding, and the anisotropic phase-field modeling; (ii) determine and incorporate the strain tensor orthogonal decompositions into each specific phase-field modeling to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of the simulation methods; (iii) combine the phase-field modelings with the BESO topology optimization algorithm to analyze the influence of interfacial effects on relationship curves and the optimal distribution of the inclusion shape. Through proposed numerical examples, it is demonstrated that the interfacial effects strongly influence crack paths, behavior curves, and optimal material distribution in structures. When considering interfacial effects, cracks are almost unable to penetrate into the inclusion phase. However, when neglecting interfacial effects, cracks propagate into the inclusion phase. This reason makes the structure more difficult to damage than when considering the interfacial effects, as evidenced by greater peak load values in behavior curves and greater total fracture resistance of the material. Especially in the example of inclusion phase optimization, the total fracture resistance value of the case neglecting interfacial effects is more than 107.9% greater than that considering interfacial effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93433,"journal":{"name":"Forces in mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666359724000283/pdfft?md5=1163fa0ec72a95ce19e73ea19f57b26f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666359724000283-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forces in mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666359724000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This present work uses the phase-field modelings to investigate the influence of interfacial effects on damage and mechanical behavior, as well as the optimal distribution of the inclusion shape within brittle inclusion-matrix structures in various typical cases. These two constituent phases in the structures are assumed to be either isotropic or anisotropic. To achieve these goals, this work will: (i) use the phase-field modelings either considering or neglecting interfacial debonding, and the anisotropic phase-field modeling; (ii) determine and incorporate the strain tensor orthogonal decompositions into each specific phase-field modeling to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of the simulation methods; (iii) combine the phase-field modelings with the BESO topology optimization algorithm to analyze the influence of interfacial effects on relationship curves and the optimal distribution of the inclusion shape. Through proposed numerical examples, it is demonstrated that the interfacial effects strongly influence crack paths, behavior curves, and optimal material distribution in structures. When considering interfacial effects, cracks are almost unable to penetrate into the inclusion phase. However, when neglecting interfacial effects, cracks propagate into the inclusion phase. This reason makes the structure more difficult to damage than when considering the interfacial effects, as evidenced by greater peak load values in behavior curves and greater total fracture resistance of the material. Especially in the example of inclusion phase optimization, the total fracture resistance value of the case neglecting interfacial effects is more than 107.9% greater than that considering interfacial effects.

断裂相场建模研究界面效应对脆性包含基体结构中损伤和最佳材料分布的影响
本研究利用相场模型来研究界面效应对损伤和机械行为的影响,以及在各种典型情况下脆性包含体-基体结构中包含体形状的最佳分布。结构中的这两个组成相被假定为各向同性或各向异性。为实现这些目标,本研究将(i) 使用考虑或忽略界面脱粘的相场建模和各向异性相场建模;(ii) 确定应变张量正交分解并将其纳入每个特定的相场建模中,以提高模拟方法的准确性和有效性;(iii) 将相场建模与 BESO 拓扑优化算法相结合,分析界面效应对关系曲线和包体形状最佳分布的影响。通过提出的数值实例,证明了界面效应对结构中的裂纹路径、行为曲线和最佳材料分布有很大影响。当考虑界面效应时,裂缝几乎无法穿透包体相。然而,当忽略界面效应时,裂纹会向包含相扩展。这使得结构比考虑界面效应时更难损坏,表现为行为曲线的峰值载荷更大,材料的总断裂抗力更大。特别是在包含相优化的例子中,忽略界面效应情况下的总断裂抗力值比考虑界面效应的情况下大 107.9% 以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forces in mechanics
Forces in mechanics Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信