Omnichannel operations in the automotive aftermarket: Consumer reactions to various strategies

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Lixu Li , Qianjun Zhang , Yaoqi Liu
{"title":"Omnichannel operations in the automotive aftermarket: Consumer reactions to various strategies","authors":"Lixu Li ,&nbsp;Qianjun Zhang ,&nbsp;Yaoqi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The new retail mode in the digital era has forced firms to engage in omnichannel management. Although many companies have realized the importance of omnichannel operations, not all firms implementing omnichannel operations have achieved the expected returns. To explain why this is the case, we draw on signaling theory and use the automotive aftermarket as our research context to explore consumer reactions to various omnichannel strategies. We design two scenario-based experiments involving a total of 630 Chinese consumers. The results show that while implementing omnichannel operations is necessary, a wider scope of omnichannel operations (i.e., the breadth strategy) does not have a significant effect on consumers' service usage intentions. By contrast, increasing the density of omnichannel operations (i.e., the depth strategy) can significantly enhance consumers’ service usage intentions. More interestingly, we find that signal costs and perceived service quality are two key mediators in linking the depth strategy–service usage intention association. Our study contributes to existing omnichannel management research by highlighting the mechanisms behind the successful implementation of omnichannel operations. The findings also assist firms in effectively merging their online and offline channels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 102677"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new retail mode in the digital era has forced firms to engage in omnichannel management. Although many companies have realized the importance of omnichannel operations, not all firms implementing omnichannel operations have achieved the expected returns. To explain why this is the case, we draw on signaling theory and use the automotive aftermarket as our research context to explore consumer reactions to various omnichannel strategies. We design two scenario-based experiments involving a total of 630 Chinese consumers. The results show that while implementing omnichannel operations is necessary, a wider scope of omnichannel operations (i.e., the breadth strategy) does not have a significant effect on consumers' service usage intentions. By contrast, increasing the density of omnichannel operations (i.e., the depth strategy) can significantly enhance consumers’ service usage intentions. More interestingly, we find that signal costs and perceived service quality are two key mediators in linking the depth strategy–service usage intention association. Our study contributes to existing omnichannel management research by highlighting the mechanisms behind the successful implementation of omnichannel operations. The findings also assist firms in effectively merging their online and offline channels.

汽车售后市场的全渠道运营:消费者对各种战略的反应
数字时代的新零售模式迫使企业进行全渠道管理。尽管许多公司已经意识到全渠道运营的重要性,但并非所有实施全渠道运营的公司都取得了预期收益。为了解释为什么会出现这种情况,我们借鉴信号传递理论,以汽车售后市场为研究背景,探讨消费者对各种全渠道战略的反应。我们设计了两个基于情景的实验,共涉及 630 名中国消费者。结果表明,虽然实施全渠道运营是必要的,但更大范围的全渠道运营(即广度策略)对消费者的服务使用意愿并没有显著影响。相比之下,增加全渠道运营的密度(即深度策略)则能显著提高消费者的服务使用意愿。更有趣的是,我们发现信号成本和感知服务质量是深度策略与服务使用意向关联的两个关键中介。我们的研究通过强调成功实施全渠道运营背后的机制,为现有的全渠道管理研究做出了贡献。研究结果还有助于企业有效融合线上和线下渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信