Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review

Anjali Rajagopal MBBS , Shant Ayanian MD, MS , Alexander J. Ryu MD , Ray Qian MD , Sean R. Legler MD , Eric A. Peeler MD , Meltiady Issa MD, MBA , Trevor J. Coons MHA , Kensaku Kawamoto MD, PhD, MHS
{"title":"Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review","authors":"Anjali Rajagopal MBBS ,&nbsp;Shant Ayanian MD, MS ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Ryu MD ,&nbsp;Ray Qian MD ,&nbsp;Sean R. Legler MD ,&nbsp;Eric A. Peeler MD ,&nbsp;Meltiady Issa MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Trevor J. Coons MHA ,&nbsp;Kensaku Kawamoto MD, PhD, MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of machine learning tools in health care is rapidly expanding. However, the processes that support these tools in deployment, that is, machine learning operations, are still emerging. The purpose of this work was not only to provide a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature in the field but also to identify gaps and offer insights for adoption in clinical practice. A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus databases. We used MeSH and non-MeSH search terms to identify pertinent articles, with the authors performing 2 screening phases and assigning relevance scores: 148 English language articles most salient to the review were eligible for inclusion; 98 offered the most unique information and these were supplemented by 50 additional sources, yielding 148 references. From the 148 references, we distilled 7 key topic areas, based on a synthesis of the available literature and how that aligned with practitioner needs. The 7 topic areas were machine learning model monitoring; automated retraining systems; ethics, equity, and bias; clinical workflow integration; infrastructure, human resources, and technology stack; regulatory considerations; and financial considerations. This review provides an overview of best practices and knowledge gaps of this domain in health care and identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the literature, which may be useful to health care machine learning practitioners and consumers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 421-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000701/pdfft?md5=6a899b6234621008d437c9cd437a3eaa&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000701-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of machine learning tools in health care is rapidly expanding. However, the processes that support these tools in deployment, that is, machine learning operations, are still emerging. The purpose of this work was not only to provide a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature in the field but also to identify gaps and offer insights for adoption in clinical practice. A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus databases. We used MeSH and non-MeSH search terms to identify pertinent articles, with the authors performing 2 screening phases and assigning relevance scores: 148 English language articles most salient to the review were eligible for inclusion; 98 offered the most unique information and these were supplemented by 50 additional sources, yielding 148 references. From the 148 references, we distilled 7 key topic areas, based on a synthesis of the available literature and how that aligned with practitioner needs. The 7 topic areas were machine learning model monitoring; automated retraining systems; ethics, equity, and bias; clinical workflow integration; infrastructure, human resources, and technology stack; regulatory considerations; and financial considerations. This review provides an overview of best practices and knowledge gaps of this domain in health care and identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the literature, which may be useful to health care machine learning practitioners and consumers.

医疗保健中的机器学习操作:范围审查
机器学习工具在医疗保健领域的应用正在迅速扩大。然而,支持这些工具部署的流程,即机器学习操作,仍在不断涌现。这项工作的目的不仅在于对该领域的现有文献进行全面综合,还在于找出差距,为临床实践中的应用提供见解。我们使用 MEDLINE、PubMed、Google Scholar、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库进行了范围综述。我们使用 MeSH 和非 MeSH 检索词来识别相关文章,作者进行了两个阶段的筛选,并给出了相关性评分:148篇与本次研究最相关的英文文章符合纳入条件;98篇提供了最独特的信息,另外还有50篇作为补充,最终得出148篇参考文献。从这 148 篇参考文献中,我们根据对现有文献的综合分析以及这些文献与从业人员需求的吻合程度,提炼出了 7 个关键主题领域。这 7 个主题领域分别是机器学习模型监控;自动再训练系统;伦理、公平和偏见;临床工作流程整合;基础设施、人力资源和技术堆叠;监管考虑因素;以及财务考虑因素。本综述概述了医疗保健领域的最佳实践和知识差距,并指出了文献的优缺点,这对医疗保健机器学习从业者和消费者可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信