Are robots crowding out migrant workers? Evidence from urban China

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Jiantao Zhou , Eddie Chi-Man Hui , Huiwen Peng
{"title":"Are robots crowding out migrant workers? Evidence from urban China","authors":"Jiantao Zhou ,&nbsp;Eddie Chi-Man Hui ,&nbsp;Huiwen Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The heated debate on automation versus labor pulls at the heartstrings of many in both academia and industry, as automation can trigger dramatic adjustments in the urban labor market. Yet, little is known about how migrant workers respond to such technological advances. To contribute to this debate, this paper empirically investigates the effects of automation (proxied by the exposure degree of industrial robots) on the settlement intention of migrant workers in urban China. Employing data from the <em>China Migrants Dynamic Survey</em> (CMDS) 2014–2017, our results reveal that cities with greater exposure to industrial robots are more likely to attract migrant workers to settle. Yet, the promotion of settlement intentions is more pronounced for migrant workers at the high and low tails of the skill distribution, leading to a U-shaped selection. Further analyses confirm that this nonlinearity is mainly due to the displacement of routine-intensive occupations, the reinstatement of high-skilled machine-complementing occupations, and the indirect boom in service-related occupations at all skill levels. In addition to economic incentives as the decisive impact channel, mechanism analyses found that the resulting labor market adjustment simultaneously enhances the social integration of migrant workers, acting as a secondary impact channel on the willingness of migrant workers to settle. Our findings raise concerns about the polarization of skills and wages among migrant workers despite their general benefit from automation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 103154"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524001541","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The heated debate on automation versus labor pulls at the heartstrings of many in both academia and industry, as automation can trigger dramatic adjustments in the urban labor market. Yet, little is known about how migrant workers respond to such technological advances. To contribute to this debate, this paper empirically investigates the effects of automation (proxied by the exposure degree of industrial robots) on the settlement intention of migrant workers in urban China. Employing data from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) 2014–2017, our results reveal that cities with greater exposure to industrial robots are more likely to attract migrant workers to settle. Yet, the promotion of settlement intentions is more pronounced for migrant workers at the high and low tails of the skill distribution, leading to a U-shaped selection. Further analyses confirm that this nonlinearity is mainly due to the displacement of routine-intensive occupations, the reinstatement of high-skilled machine-complementing occupations, and the indirect boom in service-related occupations at all skill levels. In addition to economic incentives as the decisive impact channel, mechanism analyses found that the resulting labor market adjustment simultaneously enhances the social integration of migrant workers, acting as a secondary impact channel on the willingness of migrant workers to settle. Our findings raise concerns about the polarization of skills and wages among migrant workers despite their general benefit from automation.

机器人是否挤走了农民工?来自中国城市的证据
关于自动化与劳动力的激烈辩论牵动着学术界和工业界许多人的心弦,因为自动化会引发城市劳动力市场的剧烈调整。然而,人们对农民工如何应对这种技术进步却知之甚少。为了对这一争论有所贡献,本文实证研究了自动化(以工业机器人的接触程度为指标)对中国城市农民工定居意向的影响。利用 2014-2017 年中国农民工动态调查(CMDS)的数据,我们的结果显示,工业机器人暴露程度越高的城市越有可能吸引农民工定居。然而,对处于技能分布高尾和低尾的农民工而言,落户意向的促进作用更为明显,从而导致U型选择。进一步的分析证实,这种非线性主要是由于常规密集型职业的转移、高技能机器补充职业的恢复,以及所有技能水平的服务相关职业的间接繁荣。除了经济激励这一决定性影响渠道外,机制分析还发现,由此产生的劳动力市场调整同时加强了农民工的社会融合,成为农民工定居意愿的次要影响渠道。我们的研究结果引发了对农民工技能和工资两极分化的担忧,尽管他们普遍受益于自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信