Exploring the impact of parents’ face-mask wearing on dyadic interactions in infants at higher likelihood for autism compared with general population

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Elena Capelli , Valentina Riva , Silvia D’Alfonso , Virginia Panichi , Elena Maria Riboldi , Renato Borgatti , Massimo Molteni , Livio Provenzi
{"title":"Exploring the impact of parents’ face-mask wearing on dyadic interactions in infants at higher likelihood for autism compared with general population","authors":"Elena Capelli ,&nbsp;Valentina Riva ,&nbsp;Silvia D’Alfonso ,&nbsp;Virginia Panichi ,&nbsp;Elena Maria Riboldi ,&nbsp;Renato Borgatti ,&nbsp;Massimo Molteni ,&nbsp;Livio Provenzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, both the public and researchers have raised questions regarding the potential impact of protective face-mask wearing on infants’ development. Nevertheless, limited research has tested infants’ response to protective face-mask wearing adults in real-life interactions and in neurodiverse populations. In addition, scarce attention was given to changes in interactive behavior of adults wearing a protective face-mask. The aims of the current study were (1) to examine differences in 12-month-old infants’ behavioral response to an interactive parent wearing a protective face-mask during face-to-face interaction, (2) to investigate potential differences in infants at higher likelihood for autism (HL-ASD) as compared with general population (GP) counterparts, and (3) to explore significant differences in parents’ behaviors while wearing or not wearing a protective face-mask. A total of 50 mother–infant dyads, consisting of 20 HL-ASD infants (siblings of individuals with autism) and 30 GP infants, participated in a 6-min face-to-face interaction. The interaction was videotaped through teleconferencing and comprised three 2-min episodes: (a) <em>no mask,</em> (b) <em>mask,</em> and (c) <em>post-mask.</em> Infants’ emotionality and gaze direction, as well as mothers’ vocal production and touching behaviors, were coded micro-analytically. Globally, GP infants exhibited more positive emotionality compared with their HL-ASD counterparts. Infants’ negative emotionality and gaze avoidance did not differ statistically across episodes. Both groups of infants displayed a significant increase in looking time toward the caregiver during the mask episode. No statistically significant differences emerged in mothers’ behaviors. These findings suggest that the use of protective face-masks might not negatively affect core dimensions of caregiver–infant interactions in GP and HL-ASD 12-month-old infants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 106037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, both the public and researchers have raised questions regarding the potential impact of protective face-mask wearing on infants’ development. Nevertheless, limited research has tested infants’ response to protective face-mask wearing adults in real-life interactions and in neurodiverse populations. In addition, scarce attention was given to changes in interactive behavior of adults wearing a protective face-mask. The aims of the current study were (1) to examine differences in 12-month-old infants’ behavioral response to an interactive parent wearing a protective face-mask during face-to-face interaction, (2) to investigate potential differences in infants at higher likelihood for autism (HL-ASD) as compared with general population (GP) counterparts, and (3) to explore significant differences in parents’ behaviors while wearing or not wearing a protective face-mask. A total of 50 mother–infant dyads, consisting of 20 HL-ASD infants (siblings of individuals with autism) and 30 GP infants, participated in a 6-min face-to-face interaction. The interaction was videotaped through teleconferencing and comprised three 2-min episodes: (a) no mask, (b) mask, and (c) post-mask. Infants’ emotionality and gaze direction, as well as mothers’ vocal production and touching behaviors, were coded micro-analytically. Globally, GP infants exhibited more positive emotionality compared with their HL-ASD counterparts. Infants’ negative emotionality and gaze avoidance did not differ statistically across episodes. Both groups of infants displayed a significant increase in looking time toward the caregiver during the mask episode. No statistically significant differences emerged in mothers’ behaviors. These findings suggest that the use of protective face-masks might not negatively affect core dimensions of caregiver–infant interactions in GP and HL-ASD 12-month-old infants.

与普通人群相比,探讨父母戴口罩对自闭症高发婴儿的双亲互动的影响
自 COVID-19 大流行以来,公众和研究人员都对佩戴防护口罩对婴儿发育的潜在影响提出了疑问。然而,在现实生活互动中和在神经多样性人群中测试婴儿对佩戴成人防护口罩的反应的研究非常有限。此外,很少有人关注佩戴防护口罩的成人在互动行为方面的变化。本研究的目的是:(1)研究 12 个月大的婴儿在面对面互动时对戴有防护口罩的互动父母的行为反应的差异;(2)研究自闭症(HL-ASD)高发婴儿与普通人群(GP)婴儿的潜在差异;(3)研究父母戴或不戴防护口罩时行为的显著差异。共有 50 个母婴二人组参加了 6 分钟的面对面互动,其中包括 20 个 HL-ASD 婴儿(自闭症患者的兄弟姐妹)和 30 个普通人群婴儿。互动过程通过远程会议进行录像,包括三个 2 分钟的片段:(a) 未戴面罩、(b) 戴面罩和 (c) 戴面罩后。对婴儿的情绪和注视方向以及母亲的发声和触摸行为进行了微观分析编码。总体而言,GP 婴儿比 HL-ASD 婴儿表现出更多的积极情绪。婴儿的消极情绪和目光回避在不同事件中没有统计学差异。在面具事件中,两组婴儿看向照顾者的时间都有显著增加。母亲的行为在统计学上没有明显差异。这些研究结果表明,在 12 个月大的 GP 婴儿和 HL-ASD 婴儿中,使用保护性面罩可能不会对照料者与婴儿互动的核心方面产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信