Diffeological submanifolds and their friends

Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.difgeo.2024.102170
Yael Karshon , David Miyamoto , Jordan Watts
{"title":"Diffeological submanifolds and their friends","authors":"Yael Karshon ,&nbsp;David Miyamoto ,&nbsp;Jordan Watts","doi":"10.1016/j.difgeo.2024.102170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A smooth manifold hosts different types of submanifolds, including embedded, weakly-embedded, and immersed submanifolds. The notion of an immersed submanifold requires additional structure (namely, the choice of a topology); when this additional structure is unique, we call the subset a <em>uniquely immersed submanifold</em>. Diffeology provides yet another intrinsic notion of submanifold: a <em>diffeological submanifold</em>.</p><p>We show that from a categorical perspective diffeology rises above the others: viewing manifolds as a concrete category over the category of sets, the <em>initial morphisms</em> are exactly the (diffeological) <em>inductions</em>, which are the diffeomorphisms with diffeological submanifolds. Moreover, if we view manifolds as a concrete category over the category of topological spaces, we recover Joris and Preissmann's notion of <em>pseudo-immersions</em>.</p><p>We show that these notions are all different. In particular, a theorem of Joris from 1982 yields a diffeological submanifold whose inclusion is not an immersion, answering a question that was posed by Iglesias-Zemmour. We also characterize local inductions as those pseudo-immersions that are locally injective.</p><p>In appendices, we review a proof of Joris' theorem, pointing at a flaw in one of the several other proofs that occur in the literature, and we illustrate how submanifolds inherit paracompactness from their ambient manifold.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926224524000639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A smooth manifold hosts different types of submanifolds, including embedded, weakly-embedded, and immersed submanifolds. The notion of an immersed submanifold requires additional structure (namely, the choice of a topology); when this additional structure is unique, we call the subset a uniquely immersed submanifold. Diffeology provides yet another intrinsic notion of submanifold: a diffeological submanifold.

We show that from a categorical perspective diffeology rises above the others: viewing manifolds as a concrete category over the category of sets, the initial morphisms are exactly the (diffeological) inductions, which are the diffeomorphisms with diffeological submanifolds. Moreover, if we view manifolds as a concrete category over the category of topological spaces, we recover Joris and Preissmann's notion of pseudo-immersions.

We show that these notions are all different. In particular, a theorem of Joris from 1982 yields a diffeological submanifold whose inclusion is not an immersion, answering a question that was posed by Iglesias-Zemmour. We also characterize local inductions as those pseudo-immersions that are locally injective.

In appendices, we review a proof of Joris' theorem, pointing at a flaw in one of the several other proofs that occur in the literature, and we illustrate how submanifolds inherit paracompactness from their ambient manifold.

分享
查看原文
衍射子平面及其朋友们
光滑流形包含不同类型的子流形,包括嵌入子流形、弱嵌入子流形和沉浸子流形。沉浸子流形的概念需要额外的结构(即拓扑学的选择);当这种额外的结构是唯一的时,我们称这个子集为唯一沉浸子流形。我们证明,从分类学的角度看,衍射学高于其他学科:把流形看作集合范畴上的一个具体范畴,初始形态正是(衍射学的)归纳,即具有衍射学子流形的衍射。此外,如果我们把流形看作拓扑空间范畴上的一个具体范畴,我们就能恢复约里斯和普赖斯曼的伪漫游概念。我们证明了这些概念都是不同的。特别是,1982 年约里斯的一个定理得出了一个包含不是浸没的衍射子满面,回答了伊格莱西亚斯-泽穆尔提出的一个问题。在附录中,我们回顾了乔里斯定理的一个证明,指出了文献中出现的其他几个证明中的一个缺陷,并说明了子曼形是如何从其周围流形继承准紧密性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信