An integrated Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) and optimization for enhancing human reliability in blockchain

Azam Modares , Vahideh Bafandegan Emroozi , Hadi Gholinezhad , Azade Modares
{"title":"An integrated Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) and optimization for enhancing human reliability in blockchain","authors":"Azam Modares ,&nbsp;Vahideh Bafandegan Emroozi ,&nbsp;Hadi Gholinezhad ,&nbsp;Azade Modares","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Minor errors in smart contract coding on the blockchain can lead to significant and irreversible economic losses for transaction parties. Therefore, mitigating the risk posed by coding errors is crucial, necessitating the development of approaches to enhance human reliability in coding. The Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) is one such approach, examining how environmental conditions affect the human error probability (HEP). Within CREAM, Common Performance Conditions (CPCs) influence error probability. This study ranks CPCs in smart contract coding based on their importance in coding reliability using the Bayesian Best Worst Method (BWM). Two methods are developed based on basic CREAM. In the first method, experts specify the control mode based on their opinions, and the probability of experts’ coding errors is determined according to the control level. In the second method, an optimization problem is formulated to select the most suitable programs, enhancing experts’ coding reliability. The proposed model considers energy, cost, and organizational budget factors to identify the optimal smart contract while minimizing the risks and costs associated with human errors. A case study in the electronics supply chain validates the applicability and efficacy of the proposed methods. Results from the first method indicate an opportunistic control mode. In contrast, the proposed model shows that improving CPC levels has a more significant effect, shifting the control mode towards a tactical control and reducing HEP to 0.00249.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001103/pdfft?md5=fb2cb6c291465368aa5428981750d253&pid=1-s2.0-S2772662224001103-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minor errors in smart contract coding on the blockchain can lead to significant and irreversible economic losses for transaction parties. Therefore, mitigating the risk posed by coding errors is crucial, necessitating the development of approaches to enhance human reliability in coding. The Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) is one such approach, examining how environmental conditions affect the human error probability (HEP). Within CREAM, Common Performance Conditions (CPCs) influence error probability. This study ranks CPCs in smart contract coding based on their importance in coding reliability using the Bayesian Best Worst Method (BWM). Two methods are developed based on basic CREAM. In the first method, experts specify the control mode based on their opinions, and the probability of experts’ coding errors is determined according to the control level. In the second method, an optimization problem is formulated to select the most suitable programs, enhancing experts’ coding reliability. The proposed model considers energy, cost, and organizational budget factors to identify the optimal smart contract while minimizing the risks and costs associated with human errors. A case study in the electronics supply chain validates the applicability and efficacy of the proposed methods. Results from the first method indicate an opportunistic control mode. In contrast, the proposed model shows that improving CPC levels has a more significant effect, shifting the control mode towards a tactical control and reducing HEP to 0.00249.

用于提高区块链中人的可靠性的认知可靠性和错误分析综合方法(CREAM)及优化方法
区块链智能合约编码中的微小错误都可能给交易各方带来不可挽回的重大经济损失。因此,降低编码错误带来的风险至关重要,这就需要开发一些方法来提高人类在编码中的可靠性。认知可靠性和错误分析方法(CREAM)就是这样一种方法,它研究环境条件如何影响人为错误概率(HEP)。在 CREAM 中,常见性能条件 (CPC) 会影响出错概率。本研究采用贝叶斯最佳最差法(BWM),根据智能合约编码中 CPC 对编码可靠性的重要性对其进行排序。基于基本 CREAM 开发了两种方法。在第一种方法中,专家根据自己的意见指定控制模式,并根据控制水平确定专家编码错误的概率。在第二种方法中,通过优化问题来选择最合适的方案,从而提高专家编码的可靠性。所提出的模型考虑了能源、成本和组织预算因素,以确定最优的智能合约,同时最大限度地降低人为错误带来的风险和成本。电子供应链案例研究验证了所提方法的适用性和有效性。第一种方法的结果显示了一种机会主义控制模式。相比之下,所提出的模型表明,提高 CPC 水平具有更显著的效果,使控制模式转向战术控制,并将 HEP 降至 0.00249。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信