Optimizing public parking supply and pricing strategies in a competitive market with shared private parking services

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jing Wang , Hua Wang , Xiaoning Zhang , Hua Hu , Wei Peng
{"title":"Optimizing public parking supply and pricing strategies in a competitive market with shared private parking services","authors":"Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Hua Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoning Zhang ,&nbsp;Hua Hu ,&nbsp;Wei Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shared private parking spots (SPPSs) are believed to play a crucial role in balancing the surging parking demand and further alleviating the parking pressure of public carparks. Previous relevant studies mainly focused on public parking spot management without consideration of SPPSs. Additionally, limited attention has been paid to the competitive behavior of parking options between two markets in traffic dynamic analysis in the literature. This paper investigates the parking supply and pricing strategies for a linear urban transportation network with both public and shared private parking spots. Firstly, we derive a user equilibrium in terms of departure time and mode-and-parking choice, with sufficient public parking spot provision. Secondly, we explore how the lack of public parking spots pushes some commuters to rent SPPSs and develop a mixed user equilibrium with an internal balance between SPPSs’ market demand and supply in case of inadequate public parking spots. Then, we further investigate how public parking spot provision and public parking fees affect commuters’ mode choice and departure time choice. Thirdly, we propose three management schemes: optimal public parking fee, optimal public parking spot provision, and joint optimization of public parking fee and public parking spot provision. Numerical results show that setting a proper public parking fee and providing sufficient public parking spot provision can effectively reduce total system cost. Moreover, the joint optimization scheme can further enhance the system performance in comparison to the other two management schemes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X2400295X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared private parking spots (SPPSs) are believed to play a crucial role in balancing the surging parking demand and further alleviating the parking pressure of public carparks. Previous relevant studies mainly focused on public parking spot management without consideration of SPPSs. Additionally, limited attention has been paid to the competitive behavior of parking options between two markets in traffic dynamic analysis in the literature. This paper investigates the parking supply and pricing strategies for a linear urban transportation network with both public and shared private parking spots. Firstly, we derive a user equilibrium in terms of departure time and mode-and-parking choice, with sufficient public parking spot provision. Secondly, we explore how the lack of public parking spots pushes some commuters to rent SPPSs and develop a mixed user equilibrium with an internal balance between SPPSs’ market demand and supply in case of inadequate public parking spots. Then, we further investigate how public parking spot provision and public parking fees affect commuters’ mode choice and departure time choice. Thirdly, we propose three management schemes: optimal public parking fee, optimal public parking spot provision, and joint optimization of public parking fee and public parking spot provision. Numerical results show that setting a proper public parking fee and providing sufficient public parking spot provision can effectively reduce total system cost. Moreover, the joint optimization scheme can further enhance the system performance in comparison to the other two management schemes.

在共享私人停车服务的竞争市场中优化公共停车位供应和定价策略
共享私人停车位(SPPS)被认为在平衡激增的停车需求和进一步缓解公共停车场停车压力方面发挥着至关重要的作用。以往的相关研究主要集中在公共停车点的管理上,没有考虑到共享私人停车点。此外,文献对交通动态分析中两个市场间停车选择的竞争行为关注有限。本文研究了具有公共停车位和共享私人停车位的线性城市交通网络的停车位供应和定价策略。首先,在公共停车位充足的情况下,我们推导出用户在出发时间和停车方式选择上的均衡。其次,我们探讨了公共停车位的缺乏如何促使部分通勤者租用共享私人停车位,并得出了在公共停车位不足的情况下,共享私人停车位的市场需求和供给之间存在内部平衡的混合用户均衡。然后,我们进一步研究了公共停车位供应和公共停车收费如何影响通勤者的模式选择和出发时间选择。第三,我们提出了三种管理方案:最优公共停车费、最优公共停车位提供以及公共停车费和公共停车位提供的联合优化。数值结果表明,设置适当的公共停车费和提供充足的公共停车位可以有效降低系统总成本。此外,与其他两种管理方案相比,联合优化方案能进一步提高系统性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信