Socioeconomic variations in walking rates in the United States: Recent evidence from the 2022 National Household Travel Survey

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Socioeconomic variations in walking rates in the United States: Recent evidence from the 2022 National Household Travel Survey","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We use the 2022 National Household Travel Survey for the USA—the first since the peaking of the COVID-19 pandemic—to examine variations in walking rates related to differences in socioeconomic characteristics. Our analysis provides the most recent national estimates of socioeconomic variation in walking, by far the most important form of daily physical activity in the USA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used graphical bivariate analysis and multiple regressions to explore the relationship between each of the socioeconomic variables and the following daily walk rates: the number of walk trips, time walked, and distance walked. We also analyzed three binary variables indicating whether a person made at least one walk trip during the travel day, achieved the equivalent of 150 min of walking per week, and walked on five or more days during the previous 30 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher education levels, not owning a car, not having a driver's license, not working, working from home, and high density are strongly related to higher levels of walking. We found no significant differences or mixed results for gender, age, race, and income. Because the 2022 NHTS incorporated significant changes in methodology, sample size, survey questions, and variable definitions, its estimated trip rates cannot be compared directly to the 2017 NHTS—the last survey prior to COVID. Moreover, the 2022 NHTS greatly underestimated walk trips because—unlike previous NHTS surveys—it omitted the trip diary as well as multiple prompts to remember short trips, especially walk trips.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The relationships we estimated between various walk rates and the nine socioeconomic variables for 2022 were generally consistent with the results of previous studies, including those examining the 2001, 2009, and 2017 NHTS. That suggests that these relationships have remained stable over time—even if absolute rates of walking have changed, as indicated by other studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400121X/pdfft?md5=0e8151a012e0038ce05dc1494d01a84e&pid=1-s2.0-S221414052400121X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400121X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We use the 2022 National Household Travel Survey for the USA—the first since the peaking of the COVID-19 pandemic—to examine variations in walking rates related to differences in socioeconomic characteristics. Our analysis provides the most recent national estimates of socioeconomic variation in walking, by far the most important form of daily physical activity in the USA.

Methods

We used graphical bivariate analysis and multiple regressions to explore the relationship between each of the socioeconomic variables and the following daily walk rates: the number of walk trips, time walked, and distance walked. We also analyzed three binary variables indicating whether a person made at least one walk trip during the travel day, achieved the equivalent of 150 min of walking per week, and walked on five or more days during the previous 30 days.

Results

Higher education levels, not owning a car, not having a driver's license, not working, working from home, and high density are strongly related to higher levels of walking. We found no significant differences or mixed results for gender, age, race, and income. Because the 2022 NHTS incorporated significant changes in methodology, sample size, survey questions, and variable definitions, its estimated trip rates cannot be compared directly to the 2017 NHTS—the last survey prior to COVID. Moreover, the 2022 NHTS greatly underestimated walk trips because—unlike previous NHTS surveys—it omitted the trip diary as well as multiple prompts to remember short trips, especially walk trips.

Conclusions

The relationships we estimated between various walk rates and the nine socioeconomic variables for 2022 were generally consistent with the results of previous studies, including those examining the 2001, 2009, and 2017 NHTS. That suggests that these relationships have remained stable over time—even if absolute rates of walking have changed, as indicated by other studies.

美国步行率的社会经济差异:来自 2022 年全国家庭出行调查的最新证据
导言:我们利用 2022 年美国全国住户出行调查--这是自 COVID-19 大流行达到顶峰以来的首次调查--研究了与社会经济特征差异相关的步行率变化。我们的分析提供了对步行的社会经济差异的最新全国性估计,步行是美国迄今为止最重要的日常体育活动形式。方法我们使用图形化的双变量分析和多元回归来探讨每个社会经济变量与以下日常步行率之间的关系:步行次数、步行时间和步行距离。我们还对三个二进制变量进行了分析,这三个变量分别表示一个人在一天的出行中是否至少步行一次、每周步行时间是否达到 150 分钟、在过去 30 天中是否有五天或五天以上的时间步行。我们发现在性别、年龄、种族和收入方面没有明显差异或结果不一。由于 2022 年 NHTS 在方法、样本量、调查问题和变量定义方面都有重大变化,因此其估算的出行率不能直接与 2017 年 NHTS(COVID 之前的最后一次调查)进行比较。此外,2022 年 NHTS 还大大低估了步行出行率,因为与之前的 NHTS 调查不同,2022 年 NHTS 调查省略了出行日记以及用于记忆短途出行(尤其是步行出行)的多个提示。结论我们估算的 2022 年各种步行出行率与九个社会经济变量之间的关系与之前的研究结果基本一致,包括 2001 年、2009 年和 2017 年 NHTS 的研究结果。这表明这些关系随着时间的推移保持稳定,即使步行的绝对比率发生了变化,正如其他研究表明的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信