Sex-specific association of cardiovascular drug doses with adverse outcomes in atrial fibrillation

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jeanne Moor, Michael Kuhne, Giorgio Moschovitis, Richard Kobza, Seraina Netzer, Angelo Auricchio, Juerg H Beer, Leo Bonati, Tobias Reichlin, David Conen, Stefan Osswald, Nicolas Rodondi, Carole Clair, Christine Baumgartner, Carole Elodie Aubert
{"title":"Sex-specific association of cardiovascular drug doses with adverse outcomes in atrial fibrillation","authors":"Jeanne Moor, Michael Kuhne, Giorgio Moschovitis, Richard Kobza, Seraina Netzer, Angelo Auricchio, Juerg H Beer, Leo Bonati, Tobias Reichlin, David Conen, Stefan Osswald, Nicolas Rodondi, Carole Clair, Christine Baumgartner, Carole Elodie Aubert","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Sex differences occur in atrial fibrillation (AF), including age at first manifestation, pathophysiology, treatment allocation, complication rates and quality of life. However, optimal doses of cardiovascular pharmacotherapy used in women with AF with or without heart failure (HF) are unclear. We investigated sex-specific associations of beta-blocker and renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor doses with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF or AF with concomitant HF. Methods We used data from the prospective Basel Atrial Fibrillation and Swiss Atrial Fibrillation cohorts on patients with AF. The outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolisation and HF-related hospitalisation. Predictors of interest were spline (primary analysis) or quartiles (secondary analysis) of beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor dose in per cent of the maximum dose (reference), in interaction with sex. Cox models were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and comedication. Results Among 3961 patients (28% women), MACEs occurred in 1113 (28%) patients over a 5-year median follow-up. Distributions of RAS inhibitor and beta-blocker doses were similar in women and men. Cox models revealed no association between beta-blocker dose or RAS inhibitor dose and MACE. In a subgroup of patients with AF and HF, the lowest hazard of MACE was observed in women prescribed 100% of the RAS inhibitor dose. However, there was no association between RAS dose quartiles and MACE. Conclusions In this study of patients with AF, doses of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors did not differ by sex and were not associated with MACE overall. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Due to restrictions by the ethical committee, data are not publicly available. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Sex differences occur in atrial fibrillation (AF), including age at first manifestation, pathophysiology, treatment allocation, complication rates and quality of life. However, optimal doses of cardiovascular pharmacotherapy used in women with AF with or without heart failure (HF) are unclear. We investigated sex-specific associations of beta-blocker and renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor doses with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF or AF with concomitant HF. Methods We used data from the prospective Basel Atrial Fibrillation and Swiss Atrial Fibrillation cohorts on patients with AF. The outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolisation and HF-related hospitalisation. Predictors of interest were spline (primary analysis) or quartiles (secondary analysis) of beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor dose in per cent of the maximum dose (reference), in interaction with sex. Cox models were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and comedication. Results Among 3961 patients (28% women), MACEs occurred in 1113 (28%) patients over a 5-year median follow-up. Distributions of RAS inhibitor and beta-blocker doses were similar in women and men. Cox models revealed no association between beta-blocker dose or RAS inhibitor dose and MACE. In a subgroup of patients with AF and HF, the lowest hazard of MACE was observed in women prescribed 100% of the RAS inhibitor dose. However, there was no association between RAS dose quartiles and MACE. Conclusions In this study of patients with AF, doses of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors did not differ by sex and were not associated with MACE overall. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Due to restrictions by the ethical committee, data are not publicly available. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.
心血管药物剂量与心房颤动不良后果的性别相关性
目的 心房颤动(房颤)存在性别差异,包括首次表现年龄、病理生理学、治疗分配、并发症发生率和生活质量。然而,对于患有心房颤动并伴有或不伴有心力衰竭(HF)的女性患者,心血管药物治疗的最佳剂量尚不明确。我们研究了心房颤动或心房颤动并发心力衰竭患者中,β-受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂剂量与心血管预后的性别特异性关联。方法 我们使用了前瞻性巴塞尔心房颤动队列和瑞士心房颤动队列中心房颤动患者的数据。研究结果为主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括死亡、心肌梗死、中风、全身性栓塞和与心房颤动相关的住院治疗。相关预测因子为β-受体阻滞剂或RAS抑制剂剂量(以最大剂量的百分比为单位)的spine(主要分析)或四分位数(次要分析),并与性别交互作用。Cox 模型对人口统计学、合并症和合并用药进行了调整。结果 在3961名患者(28%为女性)中,有1113名患者(28%)在5年的中位随访期间发生了MACE。女性和男性的RAS抑制剂和β-受体阻滞剂剂量分布相似。Cox 模型显示,β-受体阻滞剂剂量或 RAS 抑制剂剂量与 MACE 之间没有关联。在心房颤动和心房颤动患者亚组中,观察到女性患者的 MACE 风险最低,RAS 抑制剂剂量为 100%。然而,RAS 剂量四分位数与 MACE 之间没有关联。结论 在这项针对心房颤动患者的研究中,β-受体阻滞剂和 RAS 抑制剂的剂量没有性别差异,总体上与 MACE 无关。数据可能来自第三方,不对外公开。由于伦理委员会的限制,数据不对外公开。如需访问数据集,请联系通讯作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信