Is the United Kingdom (UK) medicines pricing policy failing patients? The impact of terminated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) appraisals for multi-indication products on patients

Helen Mitchell, Qian Xin, Jack Hide, Clement Halin, Swarali Sunil Tadwalkar, Sabera Hashim, Richard Hudson
{"title":"Is the United Kingdom (UK) medicines pricing policy failing patients? The impact of terminated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) appraisals for multi-indication products on patients","authors":"Helen Mitchell, Qian Xin, Jack Hide, Clement Halin, Swarali Sunil Tadwalkar, Sabera Hashim, Richard Hudson","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.06.24311489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) data regarding manufacturer driven terminations indicate that some patients in the United Kingdom (UK) are unable to access treatments that are available in other European countries, which may result in reduced survival and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to quantify the health impact of NICE appraisals for multi-indication products terminated for reasons not related to clinical trial failure on the UK population. Methods\nTerminated NICE appraisals (2014 to 2023) for multi-indication products were identified and a targeted literature search was conducted to identify data on the health impact of the interventions. The potential incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss and impact on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and QoL was calculated. Results\nOver 16,000 QALYs/year were potentially lost (with one QALY equal to one year of life in perfect health) across approximately 829,000 patients in the UK due to NICE appraisals for multi-indication products being terminated for reasons not related to clinical trial failure. Across oncology indications (approximately 18,900 patients), OS and PFS may have been reduced by over 9,400 years and 9,000 years, respectively. The potential impact of the treatments for non-oncology indications for which NICE appraisals were terminated on QoL was an incremental improvement of 13% (weighted average). Conclusions\nDue to the increasing number of NICE terminations for multi-indication products, patients cannot access therapies that could lengthen their lives and increase their QoL. As the UK uniform pricing policy is likely to influence manufacturer-driven terminations, introducing alternative reimbursement arrangements such as indication-based pricing (IBP) agreements to ensure that prices remain commensurate with therapeutic value could improve access to therapies in the UK, thereby improving public health.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.06.24311489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) data regarding manufacturer driven terminations indicate that some patients in the United Kingdom (UK) are unable to access treatments that are available in other European countries, which may result in reduced survival and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to quantify the health impact of NICE appraisals for multi-indication products terminated for reasons not related to clinical trial failure on the UK population. Methods Terminated NICE appraisals (2014 to 2023) for multi-indication products were identified and a targeted literature search was conducted to identify data on the health impact of the interventions. The potential incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss and impact on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and QoL was calculated. Results Over 16,000 QALYs/year were potentially lost (with one QALY equal to one year of life in perfect health) across approximately 829,000 patients in the UK due to NICE appraisals for multi-indication products being terminated for reasons not related to clinical trial failure. Across oncology indications (approximately 18,900 patients), OS and PFS may have been reduced by over 9,400 years and 9,000 years, respectively. The potential impact of the treatments for non-oncology indications for which NICE appraisals were terminated on QoL was an incremental improvement of 13% (weighted average). Conclusions Due to the increasing number of NICE terminations for multi-indication products, patients cannot access therapies that could lengthen their lives and increase their QoL. As the UK uniform pricing policy is likely to influence manufacturer-driven terminations, introducing alternative reimbursement arrangements such as indication-based pricing (IBP) agreements to ensure that prices remain commensurate with therapeutic value could improve access to therapies in the UK, thereby improving public health.
英国的药品定价政策是否令患者失望?英国国家健康与护理优化研究所(NICE)终止多适应症产品评估对患者的影响
背景英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)关于制造商驱动的终止的数据表明,英国的一些患者无法获得在其他欧洲国家可以获得的治疗,这可能会导致患者的生存率和生活质量(QoL)下降。本研究旨在量化因与临床试验失败无关的原因而终止的 NICE 多适应症产品评估对英国人口健康的影响。方法确定了已终止的 NICE 多适应症产品评估(2014 年至 2023 年),并进行了有针对性的文献检索,以确定有关干预措施对健康影响的数据。计算了潜在的增量质量调整生命年(QALY)损失以及对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和 QoL 的影响。结果 在英国,由于 NICE 因与临床试验失败无关的原因而终止对多种适应症产品的评估,约有 829,000 名患者可能损失了超过 16,000 个质量调整生命年(一个质量调整生命年等于健康状态下一年的寿命)。在肿瘤适应症方面(约 18,900 名患者),OS 和 PFS 可能分别减少了 9,400 多岁和 9,000 多岁。NICE评估终止的非肿瘤适应症治疗对QoL的潜在影响为13%(加权平均值)的增量改善。结论由于越来越多的多适应症产品被NICE终止评估,患者无法获得可延长其生命并提高其QoL的治疗方法。由于英国的统一定价政策很可能会影响制造商驱动的终止,因此引入替代性报销安排,如基于适应症的定价协议(IBP),以确保价格与治疗价值相匹配,可以改善英国治疗的可及性,从而改善公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信