Winners and losers: Competition and the invasive grass Bromus inermis

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
{"title":"Winners and losers: Competition and the invasive grass Bromus inermis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2024.104021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Competition can cause the loss of certain species and concurrent dominance of other species, especially with invasive species. Here we explore the mechanisms behind competition between an invasive grass species, smooth brome <em>Bromus inermis</em>, and two dominant native grass species, big bluestem <em>Andropogon gerardi</em> and little bluestem <em>Schizachyrium scoparium. Bromus inermis</em> is now found in all contiguous states in the United States and may outcompete native species in North America, particularly when grazed. Grazing was simulated by cutting the plants once per year and three times per year, done monthly in the summer (plus an uncut control treatment). We grew all three species in the greenhouse as monocultures, as well as in a mix of <em>B. inermis</em> + <em>A. gerardi</em> and <em>B. inermis</em> + <em>S. scoparium</em>. We found that there was considerable yield suppression when smooth brome competed with both big- and little bluestem mixes with <em>B. inermis</em> after three cuts. Non-structural carbohydrates and total nitrogen declined considerably aboveground for the <em>B. inermis</em> + <em>A. gerardi</em> mix after three cuts. The clearest overall impact was that of cutting frequency, with plants receiving three cuts per season having lowest biomass. We conclude that the maintenance of biomass in <em>B. inermis,</em> despite the level of simulated herbivory, was probably the reason that they remained competitively dominant over the two native bluestem species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X24000432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competition can cause the loss of certain species and concurrent dominance of other species, especially with invasive species. Here we explore the mechanisms behind competition between an invasive grass species, smooth brome Bromus inermis, and two dominant native grass species, big bluestem Andropogon gerardi and little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium. Bromus inermis is now found in all contiguous states in the United States and may outcompete native species in North America, particularly when grazed. Grazing was simulated by cutting the plants once per year and three times per year, done monthly in the summer (plus an uncut control treatment). We grew all three species in the greenhouse as monocultures, as well as in a mix of B. inermis + A. gerardi and B. inermis + S. scoparium. We found that there was considerable yield suppression when smooth brome competed with both big- and little bluestem mixes with B. inermis after three cuts. Non-structural carbohydrates and total nitrogen declined considerably aboveground for the B. inermis + A. gerardi mix after three cuts. The clearest overall impact was that of cutting frequency, with plants receiving three cuts per season having lowest biomass. We conclude that the maintenance of biomass in B. inermis, despite the level of simulated herbivory, was probably the reason that they remained competitively dominant over the two native bluestem species.

赢家和输家:竞争与入侵草 Bromus inermis
竞争会导致某些物种的消失和其他物种同时占据主导地位,尤其是入侵物种。在这里,我们探讨了入侵草种平滑锦鸡儿与两种优势本地草种大蓝花蓼和小蓝花蓼之间的竞争机制。大蓝花蓼和小蓝花蓼目前在美国所有毗连州都有分布,可能会取代北美的本地物种,尤其是在放牧时。模拟放牧的方法是每年割草一次和每年割草三次,夏季每月一次(加上未割草的对照处理)。我们在温室中将这三种植物作为单一栽培品种以及+和+的混合栽培品种。我们发现,当平滑锦葵与大蓝花蓼和小蓝花蓼混种竞争时,经过三次砍伐后,产量会受到相当大的抑制。三刀后,"+"和 "+"混种草地上的非结构碳水化合物和总氮显著减少。最明显的总体影响是砍伐频率,每季砍伐三次的植物生物量最低。我们得出的结论是,尽管模拟草食性水平很高,但生物量仍能保持稳定,这可能是它们与两种本地蓝花楹相比仍具有竞争优势的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信