{"title":"Winners and losers: Competition and the invasive grass Bromus inermis","authors":"David Ward , Ryan Utz","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2024.104021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Competition can cause the loss of certain species and concurrent dominance of other species, especially with invasive species. Here we explore the mechanisms behind competition between an invasive grass species, smooth brome <em>Bromus inermis</em>, and two dominant native grass species, big bluestem <em>Andropogon gerardi</em> and little bluestem <em>Schizachyrium scoparium. Bromus inermis</em> is now found in all contiguous states in the United States and may outcompete native species in North America, particularly when grazed. Grazing was simulated by cutting the plants once per year and three times per year, done monthly in the summer (plus an uncut control treatment). We grew all three species in the greenhouse as monocultures, as well as in a mix of <em>B. inermis</em> + <em>A. gerardi</em> and <em>B. inermis</em> + <em>S. scoparium</em>. We found that there was considerable yield suppression when smooth brome competed with both big- and little bluestem mixes with <em>B. inermis</em> after three cuts. Non-structural carbohydrates and total nitrogen declined considerably aboveground for the <em>B. inermis</em> + <em>A. gerardi</em> mix after three cuts. The clearest overall impact was that of cutting frequency, with plants receiving three cuts per season having lowest biomass. We conclude that the maintenance of biomass in <em>B. inermis,</em> despite the level of simulated herbivory, was probably the reason that they remained competitively dominant over the two native bluestem species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X24000432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Competition can cause the loss of certain species and concurrent dominance of other species, especially with invasive species. Here we explore the mechanisms behind competition between an invasive grass species, smooth brome Bromus inermis, and two dominant native grass species, big bluestem Andropogon gerardi and little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium. Bromus inermis is now found in all contiguous states in the United States and may outcompete native species in North America, particularly when grazed. Grazing was simulated by cutting the plants once per year and three times per year, done monthly in the summer (plus an uncut control treatment). We grew all three species in the greenhouse as monocultures, as well as in a mix of B. inermis + A. gerardi and B. inermis + S. scoparium. We found that there was considerable yield suppression when smooth brome competed with both big- and little bluestem mixes with B. inermis after three cuts. Non-structural carbohydrates and total nitrogen declined considerably aboveground for the B. inermis + A. gerardi mix after three cuts. The clearest overall impact was that of cutting frequency, with plants receiving three cuts per season having lowest biomass. We conclude that the maintenance of biomass in B. inermis, despite the level of simulated herbivory, was probably the reason that they remained competitively dominant over the two native bluestem species.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.