Scarce Workers, High Wages?

Erik-Benjamin Börschlein, Mario Bossler, Martin Popp
{"title":"Scarce Workers, High Wages?","authors":"Erik-Benjamin Börschlein, Mario Bossler, Martin Popp","doi":"arxiv-2408.04508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labor market tightness tremendously increased in Germany between 2012 and\n2022. We analyze the effect of tightness on wages by combining social security\ndata with unusually rich information on vacancies and job seekers. Instrumental\nvariable regressions reveal positive elasticities between 0.004 and 0.011,\nimplying that higher tightness explains between 7 and 19 percent of the real\nwage increase. We report greater elasticities for new hires, high-skilled\nworkers, the Eastern German labor market, and the service sector. In\nparticular, tightness raised wages at the bottom of the wage distribution,\ncontributing to the decline in wage inequality over the last decade.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Labor market tightness tremendously increased in Germany between 2012 and 2022. We analyze the effect of tightness on wages by combining social security data with unusually rich information on vacancies and job seekers. Instrumental variable regressions reveal positive elasticities between 0.004 and 0.011, implying that higher tightness explains between 7 and 19 percent of the real wage increase. We report greater elasticities for new hires, high-skilled workers, the Eastern German labor market, and the service sector. In particular, tightness raised wages at the bottom of the wage distribution, contributing to the decline in wage inequality over the last decade.
工人少,工资高?
2012 年至 2022 年期间,德国劳动力市场的紧张程度大幅上升。我们将社会保障数据与异常丰富的职位空缺和求职者信息相结合,分析了劳动力市场紧缩对工资的影响。工具变量回归显示了介于 0.004 和 0.011 之间的正弹性,这意味着较高的紧缩度可以解释实际工资增长的 7% 到 19%。我们报告了新员工、高技能工人、东德劳动力市场和服务业的更大弹性。特别是,紧缩提高了工资分布最底层的工资,导致过去十年中工资不平等现象的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信