Social isolation in mid-life: associations with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated health in two successive British birth cohorts

Rosie Mansfield, Marcus Richards, George B Ploubidis, Morag Henderson, Praveetha Patalay
{"title":"Social isolation in mid-life: associations with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated health in two successive British birth cohorts","authors":"Rosie Mansfield, Marcus Richards, George B Ploubidis, Morag Henderson, Praveetha Patalay","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Social isolation can be quantified using indicators across a range of social contexts e.g., household composition, friends and family, employment and community. Little is known about the way in which different forms of isolation differentially impact health, whether they produce a dose-response effect, and whether different forms of isolation interact in an additive or multiplicative way to impact psychological distress, life satisfaction and general health. The current study focuses on social isolation in mid-life, a life stage often neglected by the field. Research Design and Method: Data (N=32,391) were analysed from two successive British birth cohort studies: 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS) N=16,585 and the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS) N=15,806 focusing on participants social isolation during mid-life (ages 42-46). Linear multivariable regression models were run to investigate the independent, dose-response and interactive associations of social isolation indicators with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated general health. Subsequently, all models were stratified to examine sex differences, and a cohort interaction was tested to assess cohort effects. An additional latent class analysis investigated whether different forms of isolation cluster in mid-life. Results: Independent associations varied by form of isolation and specific health outcomes, for instance, being out of education and employment was associated with all outcomes, living alone was only associated with lower life satisfaction and a lack of frequent contact with friends and relatives, no labour market participation and limited community engagement were associated with lower life satisfaction and self-rated general health. There was a dose-response relationship with higher social isolation scores associated with greater psychological distress, lower life satisfaction, and poorer self-reported general health. The effects of different combinations of social isolation on health appears to be additive, with no consistent sex and cohort differences observed.\nConclusions: Results support a multi-domain, multi-context approach to studying social isolation and provides justification for research that investigates the separate and combined effects of different forms of social isolation; and the relevance of investigating social isolation in relation to the complete state of physical, mental and social wellbeing. Overall, isolation in its various forms was found to be detrimental for health, in mid-life, and over time in Great Britain. In particular, social isolation was associated most consistently with lower levels of life satisfaction. Efforts to reduce social isolation and its negative health impacts must recognise the complexity of experience across contexts and for different populations.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Social isolation can be quantified using indicators across a range of social contexts e.g., household composition, friends and family, employment and community. Little is known about the way in which different forms of isolation differentially impact health, whether they produce a dose-response effect, and whether different forms of isolation interact in an additive or multiplicative way to impact psychological distress, life satisfaction and general health. The current study focuses on social isolation in mid-life, a life stage often neglected by the field. Research Design and Method: Data (N=32,391) were analysed from two successive British birth cohort studies: 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS) N=16,585 and the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS) N=15,806 focusing on participants social isolation during mid-life (ages 42-46). Linear multivariable regression models were run to investigate the independent, dose-response and interactive associations of social isolation indicators with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated general health. Subsequently, all models were stratified to examine sex differences, and a cohort interaction was tested to assess cohort effects. An additional latent class analysis investigated whether different forms of isolation cluster in mid-life. Results: Independent associations varied by form of isolation and specific health outcomes, for instance, being out of education and employment was associated with all outcomes, living alone was only associated with lower life satisfaction and a lack of frequent contact with friends and relatives, no labour market participation and limited community engagement were associated with lower life satisfaction and self-rated general health. There was a dose-response relationship with higher social isolation scores associated with greater psychological distress, lower life satisfaction, and poorer self-reported general health. The effects of different combinations of social isolation on health appears to be additive, with no consistent sex and cohort differences observed. Conclusions: Results support a multi-domain, multi-context approach to studying social isolation and provides justification for research that investigates the separate and combined effects of different forms of social isolation; and the relevance of investigating social isolation in relation to the complete state of physical, mental and social wellbeing. Overall, isolation in its various forms was found to be detrimental for health, in mid-life, and over time in Great Britain. In particular, social isolation was associated most consistently with lower levels of life satisfaction. Efforts to reduce social isolation and its negative health impacts must recognise the complexity of experience across contexts and for different populations.
中年时期的社会隔离:两个连续的英国出生队列中心理困扰、生活满意度和自我健康评价的关系
背景和目标:社会隔离可以通过一系列社会环境指标进行量化,例如家庭组成、朋友和家人、就业和社区。对于不同形式的孤立如何对健康产生不同的影响,是否会产生剂量反应效应,以及不同形式的孤立是否会以相加或相乘的方式对心理困扰、生活满意度和总体健康产生影响,人们知之甚少。目前的研究重点是中年时期的社会隔离,这是一个经常被研究领域忽视的人生阶段。研究设计与方法:对两项连续的英国出生队列研究的数据(32,391 人)进行了分析:1970 年英国队列研究 (BCS) N=16,585 人,1958 年全国儿童发展研究 (NCDS) N=15,806 人,重点研究参与者在中年时期(42-46 岁)的社会隔离情况。通过线性多元回归模型,研究了社会隔离指标与心理困扰、生活满意度和自评一般健康之间的独立、剂量反应和交互关联。随后,对所有模型进行了分层,以检查性别差异,并对队列交互作用进行了测试,以评估队列效应。另外还进行了潜类分析,研究不同形式的孤立是否会在中年时期聚集。研究结果不同形式的孤独与特定健康结果之间的独立关联各不相同,例如,失学和失业与所有结果都有关联,独居只与较低的生活满意度和缺乏与亲友的频繁联系有关,没有参与劳动力市场和社区参与有限与较低的生活满意度和自我评价的一般健康有关。社会隔离得分越高,心理压力越大,生活满意度越低,自我报告的总体健康状况越差,这之间存在着剂量-反应关系。社会隔离的不同组合对健康的影响似乎是相加的,没有观察到一致的性别和队列差异:研究结果支持采用多领域、多情境的方法来研究社会隔离,并为调查不同形式的社会隔离的单独和综合影响的研究提供了依据;同时也证明了调查社会隔离与身体、精神和社会福祉的完整状态的相关性。总体而言,在大不列颠,各种形式的孤立在中年和长期都对健康不利。其中,社会隔离与生活满意度较低的关系最为密切。要努力减少社会隔离及其对健康的负面影响,就必须认识到不同环境和不同人群的经历的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信