Assembling the Challenge of Multimorbidity in Zimbabwe: A Participatory Ethnographic Study

Justin Dixon, Efison Dhodho, Fionah Mundoga, Karen Webb, Pugie Chimberengwa, Trudy Mhlanga, Tatenda Nhapi, Theonevus Tinashe Chinyanga, Justice Mudavanhu, Lee Nkala, Ronald Nyabereka, Gwati Gwati, Gerald Shambira, Trust Zaranyika, Clare I.R. Chandler, Rashida A. Ferrand, Chiratidzo Ndhlovu
{"title":"Assembling the Challenge of Multimorbidity in Zimbabwe: A Participatory Ethnographic Study","authors":"Justin Dixon, Efison Dhodho, Fionah Mundoga, Karen Webb, Pugie Chimberengwa, Trudy Mhlanga, Tatenda Nhapi, Theonevus Tinashe Chinyanga, Justice Mudavanhu, Lee Nkala, Ronald Nyabereka, Gwati Gwati, Gerald Shambira, Trust Zaranyika, Clare I.R. Chandler, Rashida A. Ferrand, Chiratidzo Ndhlovu","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.06.24311557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multimorbidity, increasingly recognised as a global health challenge, has recently emerged on the health agendas of many lower-income countries, including in Africa. Yet with its conceptual origins in the global North, its meaning and possible utility for stakeholders in lower-resources settings remains abstract. This study drew together policymakers, public health practitioners, academics, health informaticians, health professionals, and people living with multimorbidity (PLWMM) in Zimbabwe to understand: What is the transformative potential and possible limitations of elevating multimorbidity as a priority in this setting? To bring these different perspectives into conversation, we used a participatory ethnographic design that involved a health facility survey, participant-observation, in-depth interviews, audio-visual diaries, and participatory workshops. Multimorbidity, we found, was new to many respondents but generally viewed as a meaningful and useful concept. It foregrounded a range of challenges related to the ‘vertical’ organisation and uneven funding of different diseases, while revealing promising opportunities for integration across entrenched silos of knowledge and practice. However, with capacity and momentum to address multimorbidity currently concentrated within the HIV programme, there was concern that multimorbidity could itself become verticalized, undercutting its transformative potential. Participants agreed that responding to multimorbidity requires a decisive shift from vertical, disease-centred programming to restore the comprehensive primary care that undergirded Zimbabwe’s once-renowned health system. It also means building a policy-enabling environment that values generalist (as well as specialist) knowledge, ground-level experience, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. The ‘learning’ health system, we conclude, represents a promising conceptual lens for unifying these imperatives, providing a tangible framework for how knowledge, policy, and practice synergise within more self-reliant, person-centred health systems able to respond to ever-evolving complex health challenges like multimorbidity.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.06.24311557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multimorbidity, increasingly recognised as a global health challenge, has recently emerged on the health agendas of many lower-income countries, including in Africa. Yet with its conceptual origins in the global North, its meaning and possible utility for stakeholders in lower-resources settings remains abstract. This study drew together policymakers, public health practitioners, academics, health informaticians, health professionals, and people living with multimorbidity (PLWMM) in Zimbabwe to understand: What is the transformative potential and possible limitations of elevating multimorbidity as a priority in this setting? To bring these different perspectives into conversation, we used a participatory ethnographic design that involved a health facility survey, participant-observation, in-depth interviews, audio-visual diaries, and participatory workshops. Multimorbidity, we found, was new to many respondents but generally viewed as a meaningful and useful concept. It foregrounded a range of challenges related to the ‘vertical’ organisation and uneven funding of different diseases, while revealing promising opportunities for integration across entrenched silos of knowledge and practice. However, with capacity and momentum to address multimorbidity currently concentrated within the HIV programme, there was concern that multimorbidity could itself become verticalized, undercutting its transformative potential. Participants agreed that responding to multimorbidity requires a decisive shift from vertical, disease-centred programming to restore the comprehensive primary care that undergirded Zimbabwe’s once-renowned health system. It also means building a policy-enabling environment that values generalist (as well as specialist) knowledge, ground-level experience, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. The ‘learning’ health system, we conclude, represents a promising conceptual lens for unifying these imperatives, providing a tangible framework for how knowledge, policy, and practice synergise within more self-reliant, person-centred health systems able to respond to ever-evolving complex health challenges like multimorbidity.
在津巴布韦应对多重疾病的挑战:参与式人种学研究
多病共存日益被视为一项全球性的健康挑战,最近已出现在包括非洲在内的许多低收入国家的健康议程上。然而,由于其概念源于全球北方国家,对于资源较少环境中的利益相关者来说,其含义和可能的效用仍然很抽象。这项研究汇集了津巴布韦的政策制定者、公共卫生从业者、学者、卫生信息学家、卫生专业人员和多病共存者(PLWMM),以了解:在这种情况下,将多病症提升为优先事项有哪些变革潜力和可能的局限性?为了将这些不同的观点引入对话,我们采用了参与式人种学设计,包括医疗机构调查、参与者观察、深度访谈、视听日记和参与式研讨会。我们发现,对许多受访者来说,多病同治是一个新概念,但普遍认为这是一个有意义且有用的概念。它凸显了与不同疾病的 "垂直 "组织和不均衡资助有关的一系列挑战,同时也揭示了跨越根深蒂固的知识和实践孤岛进行整合的大好机会。然而,由于应对多病症的能力和势头目前集中在艾滋病毒计划中,有人担心多病症本身可能会被纵向化,从而削弱其变革潜力。与会者一致认为,应对多发病需要果断转变以疾病为中心的纵向计划,恢复作为津巴布韦一度闻名的卫生系统基础的全面初级保健。这也意味着要建立一个政策扶持环境,重视通才(以及专才)知识、基层经验和利益相关者的包容性参与。我们的结论是,"学习型 "医疗系统是一个很有前景的概念视角,它可以将这些必要条件统一起来,为知识、政策和实践如何在更加自立、以人为本的医疗系统中协同作用提供了一个具体的框架,从而能够应对像多病症这样不断变化的复杂医疗挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信