Investigating the hyperfine systematic error and relative phase in low spin-polarization alkali FID magnetometers

D. P. Hewatt, M. Ellmeier, C. Kiehl, T. S. Menon, J. W. Pollock, C. A. Regal, S. Knappe
{"title":"Investigating the hyperfine systematic error and relative phase in low spin-polarization alkali FID magnetometers","authors":"D. P. Hewatt, M. Ellmeier, C. Kiehl, T. S. Menon, J. W. Pollock, C. A. Regal, S. Knappe","doi":"arxiv-2408.00898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alkali-metal optically-pumped magnetometers are prone to inaccuracies arising\nfrom the overlap of the average F = I + 1/2 and F = I - 1/2 ground-state Zeeman\nresonances. We employ density-matrix simulations and experiments to investigate\nhow this hyperfine systematic error varies with spin polarization in a\n$^{87}$Rb free-induction-decay (FID) magnetometer. At low spin polarizations,\n($P \\leq 0.5$), this effect causes single-frequency magnetic-field extraction\ntechniques to exhibit inaccuracies up to approximately 3.5 nT. Density-matrix\nsimulations reveal that this bias can be traced to the relative amplitude and\nphase between the F = I $\\pm$ 1/2 hyperfine ground-state manifolds in the FID\nspin precession signal. We show that this systematic error can be mitigated\nusing either a double-frequency fitting model that accounts for the relative\namplitude and phase or synchronous-pulse pumping, that minimizes the F = 1\ncontribution to the FID signal. Theoretical simulations predict accuracies\nwithin 0.5 nT for both techniques across a wide range of spin polarizations,\nsuggesting a sevenfold enhancement over single-frequency extraction methods.\nOur experiments validate this, showcasing a variation in the extracted field\nbelow 1 nT, a 3.5-fold improvement compared to single-frequency extraction\nmethods. Furthermore, the mitigation techniques demonstrate agreement of the\nextracted magnetic field within 1.5 nT.","PeriodicalId":501039,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atomic Physics","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atomic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.00898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alkali-metal optically-pumped magnetometers are prone to inaccuracies arising from the overlap of the average F = I + 1/2 and F = I - 1/2 ground-state Zeeman resonances. We employ density-matrix simulations and experiments to investigate how this hyperfine systematic error varies with spin polarization in a $^{87}$Rb free-induction-decay (FID) magnetometer. At low spin polarizations, ($P \leq 0.5$), this effect causes single-frequency magnetic-field extraction techniques to exhibit inaccuracies up to approximately 3.5 nT. Density-matrix simulations reveal that this bias can be traced to the relative amplitude and phase between the F = I $\pm$ 1/2 hyperfine ground-state manifolds in the FID spin precession signal. We show that this systematic error can be mitigated using either a double-frequency fitting model that accounts for the relative amplitude and phase or synchronous-pulse pumping, that minimizes the F = 1 contribution to the FID signal. Theoretical simulations predict accuracies within 0.5 nT for both techniques across a wide range of spin polarizations, suggesting a sevenfold enhancement over single-frequency extraction methods. Our experiments validate this, showcasing a variation in the extracted field below 1 nT, a 3.5-fold improvement compared to single-frequency extraction methods. Furthermore, the mitigation techniques demonstrate agreement of the extracted magnetic field within 1.5 nT.
研究低自旋极化碱 FID 磁强计中的超细系统误差和相对相位
碱金属光泵磁强计容易因平均 F = I + 1/2 和 F = I - 1/2 基态泽曼共振的重叠而产生误差。我们利用密度矩阵模拟和实验来研究这种超精细系统误差如何随^{87}$Rb自由感应衰变(FID)磁强计的自旋极化而变化。在低自旋极化条件下($P \leq 0.5$),这种效应会导致单频磁场提取技术表现出高达约 3.5 nT 的误差。密度矩阵模拟显示,这种偏差可追溯到FID自旋前驱信号中F = I $\pm$ 1/2 超精细基态流形之间的相对振幅和相位。我们的研究表明,这种系统误差可以通过考虑相对振幅和相位的双频拟合模型或同步脉冲泵浦来减小,同步脉冲泵浦可以使 F = 1 对 FID 信号的贡献最小化。理论模拟预测,在广泛的自旋极化范围内,这两种技术的精确度都在 0.5 nT 以内,这表明与单频提取方法相比,这两种技术的精确度提高了七倍。此外,缓解技术还证明了提取磁场在 1.5 nT 范围内的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信