Towards a high quality in-situ observation network for oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in Europe: transferring traceability to the International System of Units (SI) to the field

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Maitane Iturrate-Garcia, Thérèse Salameh, Paul Schlauri, Annarita Baldan, Martin K. Vollmer, Evdokia Stratigou, Sebastian Dusanter, Jianrong Li, Stefan Persijn, Anja Claude, Rupert Holzinger, Christophe Sutour, Tatiana Macé, Yasin Elshorbany, Andreas Ackermann, Céline Pascale, Stefan Reimann
{"title":"Towards a high quality in-situ observation network for oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in Europe: transferring traceability to the International System of Units (SI) to the field","authors":"Maitane Iturrate-Garcia, Thérèse Salameh, Paul Schlauri, Annarita Baldan, Martin K. Vollmer, Evdokia Stratigou, Sebastian Dusanter, Jianrong Li, Stefan Persijn, Anja Claude, Rupert Holzinger, Christophe Sutour, Tatiana Macé, Yasin Elshorbany, Andreas Ackermann, Céline Pascale, Stefan Reimann","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2024-2236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have a large impact on the oxidising capacity of the troposphere and are major precursors of tropospheric ozone and secondary atmospheric aerosols. Accurate measurements and data comparability of VOCs among monitoring networks are essential to assess the trends of these secondary air pollutants. Metrological traceability of the measurements to the international system of units (SI-traceability) contributes to both: measurement consistency and data comparability. Accurate, stable and SI-traceable reference gas mixtures (RGMs) and working standards are needed to achieve SI-traceability through an unbroken chain of calibrations of the analytical instruments used to monitor VOCs. However, for many oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs), such RGMs and working standards are not available at atmospheric amount of substance fraction levels (&lt; 10 nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>). Here, we present the protocols developed to transfer SI-traceability to the field by producing two types of SI-traceable working standards for selected OVOCs. These working standards, based on RGMs diluted dynamically with dry nitrogen and on certified spiked whole air samples, were then assessed using Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector (TD-GC-FID) and Proton Transfer Reaction-Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) as analytical methods. For that purpose, we calibrated five analytical instruments using in-house calibration standards and treated the new SI-traceable working standards as samples. Due to analytical limitations, the assessment was only possible for acetaldehyde, acetone, methanol and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). Relative differences between assigned and measured values were used to assess the working standards based on dilution of RGMs. The relative differences were within the measurement uncertainty for acetone, MEK, methanol and acetaldehyde at amount of substance fractions around 10 nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>. For the working standards based on certified spiked whole air samples in pressurized cylinders, results showed a good agreement among the laboratories (i.e., differences within the measurement expanded uncertainties (U) ranging between 0.5 nmol mol<sup>-1 </sup>and 3.3 nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>) and with the certified amount of substance fraction value for acetaldehyde (15.7 nmol mol<sup>-1</sup> ± 3.6 (U) nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>), acetone (17 nmol mol<sup>-1 </sup>± 1.5 (U) nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>) and MEK (12.3 nmol mol<sup>-1 </sup>± 2.3 (U) nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>). Despite the promising results for the working standards based on the dilution of RGMs and on certified spiked whole air samples filled into pressurized cylinders, the assessment must be considered with care due to the large measurement uncertainty, particularly for methanol. Active collaboration among metrological, meteorological and atmospheric chemistry monitoring communities is needed to tackle the challenges of OVOC monitoring, such as the lack of stable and SI-traceable calibration standards (i.e., RGMs and working standards). Besides from this collaboration, other research applications, such as modelling and remote sensing, may benefit from the transfer of SI-traceability to monitoring stations.","PeriodicalId":8619,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","volume":"198 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have a large impact on the oxidising capacity of the troposphere and are major precursors of tropospheric ozone and secondary atmospheric aerosols. Accurate measurements and data comparability of VOCs among monitoring networks are essential to assess the trends of these secondary air pollutants. Metrological traceability of the measurements to the international system of units (SI-traceability) contributes to both: measurement consistency and data comparability. Accurate, stable and SI-traceable reference gas mixtures (RGMs) and working standards are needed to achieve SI-traceability through an unbroken chain of calibrations of the analytical instruments used to monitor VOCs. However, for many oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs), such RGMs and working standards are not available at atmospheric amount of substance fraction levels (< 10 nmol mol-1). Here, we present the protocols developed to transfer SI-traceability to the field by producing two types of SI-traceable working standards for selected OVOCs. These working standards, based on RGMs diluted dynamically with dry nitrogen and on certified spiked whole air samples, were then assessed using Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector (TD-GC-FID) and Proton Transfer Reaction-Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) as analytical methods. For that purpose, we calibrated five analytical instruments using in-house calibration standards and treated the new SI-traceable working standards as samples. Due to analytical limitations, the assessment was only possible for acetaldehyde, acetone, methanol and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). Relative differences between assigned and measured values were used to assess the working standards based on dilution of RGMs. The relative differences were within the measurement uncertainty for acetone, MEK, methanol and acetaldehyde at amount of substance fractions around 10 nmol mol-1. For the working standards based on certified spiked whole air samples in pressurized cylinders, results showed a good agreement among the laboratories (i.e., differences within the measurement expanded uncertainties (U) ranging between 0.5 nmol mol-1 and 3.3 nmol mol-1) and with the certified amount of substance fraction value for acetaldehyde (15.7 nmol mol-1 ± 3.6 (U) nmol mol-1), acetone (17 nmol mol-1 ± 1.5 (U) nmol mol-1) and MEK (12.3 nmol mol-1 ± 2.3 (U) nmol mol-1). Despite the promising results for the working standards based on the dilution of RGMs and on certified spiked whole air samples filled into pressurized cylinders, the assessment must be considered with care due to the large measurement uncertainty, particularly for methanol. Active collaboration among metrological, meteorological and atmospheric chemistry monitoring communities is needed to tackle the challenges of OVOC monitoring, such as the lack of stable and SI-traceable calibration standards (i.e., RGMs and working standards). Besides from this collaboration, other research applications, such as modelling and remote sensing, may benefit from the transfer of SI-traceability to monitoring stations.
建立欧洲含氧挥发性有机化合物(OVOC)高质量原位观测网络:将国际单位制(SI)的可追溯性转移到现场
摘要挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)对对流层的氧化能力有很大影响,是对流层臭氧和二次大气气溶胶的主要前体物。要评估这些二次空气污染物的趋势,就必须对各监测网络中的挥发性有机化合物进行精确测量并使数据具有可比性。按照国际单位制(SI-可追溯性)进行测量的计量可追溯性有助于实现测量的一致性和数据的可比性。通过对用于监测挥发性有机化合物的分析仪器进行不间断的校准链,实现 SI 可追溯性需要准确、稳定和 SI 可追溯的参考混合气体 (RGM) 和工作标准。然而,对于许多含氧挥发性有机化合物 (OVOC) 而言,在大气物质分数水平(< 10 nmol mol-1)上无法获得此类 RGM 和工作标准。在此,我们介绍了为将 SI 可追溯性转移到现场而开发的协议,为选定的 OVOC 生产了两种类型的 SI 可追溯工作标准。这些工作标准基于用干氮动态稀释的 RGM 和经过认证的加标整个空气样本,然后使用热脱附-气相色谱-火焰离子化检测器(TD-GC-FID)和质子传递反应-飞行时间质谱法(PTR-ToF-MS)作为分析方法进行评估。为此,我们使用内部校准标准校准了五台分析仪器,并将新的 SI 可追溯工作标准作为样品处理。由于分析能力有限,我们只能对乙醛、丙酮、甲醇和甲乙酮 (MEK) 进行评估。分配值和测量值之间的相对差异被用来评估基于稀释 RGM 的工作标准。丙酮、MEK、甲醇和乙醛的物质分数在 10 nmol mol-1 左右时,相对差值在测量不确定范围内。对于基于加压钢瓶中经认证的加标整个空气样本的工作标准,结果显示各实验室之间的一致性很好(即、乙醛(15.7 nmol mol-1 ± 3.6 (U) nmol mol-1)、丙酮(17 nmol mol-1 ± 1.5 (U) nmol mol-1)和甲基安息香酸(12.3 nmol mol-1 ± 2.3 (U) nmol mol-1)的测量结果与经认证的物质分量值一致。尽管基于 RGMs 稀释的工作标准和注入加压钢瓶的经认证的加标整个空气样本的结果很好,但由于测量不确定性较大,尤其是甲醇的测量不确定性较大,因此必须谨慎考虑评估。计量、气象和大气化学监测界需要积极合作,以应对 OVOC 监测所面临的挑战,例如缺乏稳定和 SI 可追溯的校准标准(即 RGM 和工作标准)。除此合作外,其他研究应用,如建模和遥感,也可从监测站的 SI 可追溯性转移中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of advances in remote sensing, in-situ and laboratory measurement techniques for the constituents and properties of the Earth’s atmosphere. The main subject areas comprise the development, intercomparison and validation of measurement instruments and techniques of data processing and information retrieval for gases, aerosols, and clouds. The manuscript types considered for peer-reviewed publication are research articles, review articles, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信