Wonsuk Oh, Kullaya Takkavatakarn, Hannah Kittrell, Khaled Shawwa, Hernando Gomez, Ashwin S Sawant, Pranai Tandon, Gagan Kumar, Michael Sterling, Ira Hofer, Lili Chan, John Oropello, Roopa Kohli-Seth, Alexander W Charney, Monica Kraft, Patricia Kovatch, John A Kellum, Girish N Nadkarni, Ankit Sakhuja
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Policy Tree Approach for Optimizing Intravenous Fluids in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis and Acute Kidney Injury","authors":"Wonsuk Oh, Kullaya Takkavatakarn, Hannah Kittrell, Khaled Shawwa, Hernando Gomez, Ashwin S Sawant, Pranai Tandon, Gagan Kumar, Michael Sterling, Ira Hofer, Lili Chan, John Oropello, Roopa Kohli-Seth, Alexander W Charney, Monica Kraft, Patricia Kovatch, John A Kellum, Girish N Nadkarni, Ankit Sakhuja","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.06.24311556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intravenous fluids are mainstay of management of acute kidney injury (AKI) after sepsis but can cause fluid overload. Recent literature shows that restrictive fluid strategy may be beneficial in some patients with AKI, however, identifying these patients is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning algorithm to identify patients who would benefit from a restrictive fluid strategy. Methods and Findings: We included patients with sepsis who developed AKI within 48 hours of ICU admission and defined restrictive fluid strategy as receiving <500mL fluids within 24 hours after AKI. Our primary outcome was early AKI reversal within 48 hours of AKI onset, and secondary outcomes included sustained AKI reversal and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) at discharge. We used a causal forest, a machine learning algorithm to estimate individual treatment effects and policy tree algorithm to identify patients who would benefit by restrictive fluid strategy. We developed the algorithm in MIMIC-IV and validated it in eICU database.\nAmong 2,091 patients in the external validation cohort, policy tree recommended restrictive fluids for 88.2%. Among these, patients who received restrictive fluids demonstrated significantly higher rate of early AKI reversal (48.2% vs 39.6%, p<0.001), sustained AKI reversal (36.7% vs 27.4%, p<0.001) and lower rates of MAKE by discharge (29.3% vs 35.1%, p=0.019). These results were consistent in adjusted analysis. Conclusion: Policy tree based on causal machine learning can identify septic patients with AKI who benefit from a restrictive fluid strategy. This approach needs to be validated in prospective trials.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.06.24311556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Intravenous fluids are mainstay of management of acute kidney injury (AKI) after sepsis but can cause fluid overload. Recent literature shows that restrictive fluid strategy may be beneficial in some patients with AKI, however, identifying these patients is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning algorithm to identify patients who would benefit from a restrictive fluid strategy. Methods and Findings: We included patients with sepsis who developed AKI within 48 hours of ICU admission and defined restrictive fluid strategy as receiving <500mL fluids within 24 hours after AKI. Our primary outcome was early AKI reversal within 48 hours of AKI onset, and secondary outcomes included sustained AKI reversal and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) at discharge. We used a causal forest, a machine learning algorithm to estimate individual treatment effects and policy tree algorithm to identify patients who would benefit by restrictive fluid strategy. We developed the algorithm in MIMIC-IV and validated it in eICU database.
Among 2,091 patients in the external validation cohort, policy tree recommended restrictive fluids for 88.2%. Among these, patients who received restrictive fluids demonstrated significantly higher rate of early AKI reversal (48.2% vs 39.6%, p<0.001), sustained AKI reversal (36.7% vs 27.4%, p<0.001) and lower rates of MAKE by discharge (29.3% vs 35.1%, p=0.019). These results were consistent in adjusted analysis. Conclusion: Policy tree based on causal machine learning can identify septic patients with AKI who benefit from a restrictive fluid strategy. This approach needs to be validated in prospective trials.
背景:静脉输液是治疗脓毒症后急性肾损伤(AKI)的主要方法,但可能导致液体超负荷。最近的文献显示,限制性输液策略可能对某些 AKI 患者有益,但识别这些患者却很困难。我们的目标是开发并验证一种机器学习算法,以识别可从限制性输液策略中获益的患者。方法和结果:我们纳入了在入住 ICU 48 小时内发生 AKI 的脓毒症患者,并将限制性输液策略定义为在发生 AKI 后 24 小时内接受 500 毫升液体。我们的主要结果是在 AKI 发生后 48 小时内早期逆转 AKI,次要结果包括持续逆转 AKI 和出院时的主要肾脏不良事件 (MAKE)。我们使用因果森林(一种估计个体治疗效果的机器学习算法)和政策树算法来确定哪些患者可从限制性输液策略中获益。我们在 MIMIC-IV 中开发了该算法,并在 eICU 数据库中进行了验证。在这些患者中,接受限制性输液的患者早期 AKI 逆转率(48.2% vs 39.6%,p<0.001)、持续 AKI 逆转率(36.7% vs 27.4%,p<0.001)和出院时 MAKE 率(29.3% vs 35.1%,p=0.019)均明显较高。这些结果在调整分析中保持一致。结论基于因果机器学习的策略树能识别出从限制性输液策略中获益的脓毒症 AKI 患者。这种方法需要在前瞻性试验中进行验证。