Comparing Artificial Neural Networks and Regression-based Methods for Modeling Daily Dissolved Oxygen Concentration: A Study Based on Long-term Monitored Data

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sinan Nacar, Betul Mete, Adem Bayram
{"title":"Comparing Artificial Neural Networks and Regression-based Methods for Modeling Daily Dissolved Oxygen Concentration: A Study Based on Long-term Monitored Data","authors":"Sinan Nacar, Betul Mete, Adem Bayram","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-2613-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, the ability of regression-based methods, namely conventional regression analysis (CRA) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and artificial neural networks (ANNs) method was investigated to model the river dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Daily average data for discharge and water-quality (WQ) indicators, which include DO concentration, temperature, specific conductance, and pH, were provided for the monitoring stations USGS 14210000 (upstream) and USGS 14211010 (downstream) in the Clackamas River, Oregon, USA. Eight models were established using different combinations of the input parameters and tested to determine the contribution of each parameter used in the modeling to the performance of the models. The results of the models and methods were compared with each other using several performance statistics. Although the performances of the methods were quite close to each other, the highest estimation performance was obtained from the ANNs method in the testing data sets. According to the performance statistics, Model 8, in which all WQ indicators were included as input parameters, was selected as the optimal model to estimate DO concentration of different periods of the same stations. However, when estimating the DO concentration from one station to another, the highest performance statistics were obtained from Model 8 for upstream and Model 1 for downstream station using the CRA method. For the ANNs method, Model 1 having the single input for both stations was the best model.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2613-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the ability of regression-based methods, namely conventional regression analysis (CRA) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and artificial neural networks (ANNs) method was investigated to model the river dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Daily average data for discharge and water-quality (WQ) indicators, which include DO concentration, temperature, specific conductance, and pH, were provided for the monitoring stations USGS 14210000 (upstream) and USGS 14211010 (downstream) in the Clackamas River, Oregon, USA. Eight models were established using different combinations of the input parameters and tested to determine the contribution of each parameter used in the modeling to the performance of the models. The results of the models and methods were compared with each other using several performance statistics. Although the performances of the methods were quite close to each other, the highest estimation performance was obtained from the ANNs method in the testing data sets. According to the performance statistics, Model 8, in which all WQ indicators were included as input parameters, was selected as the optimal model to estimate DO concentration of different periods of the same stations. However, when estimating the DO concentration from one station to another, the highest performance statistics were obtained from Model 8 for upstream and Model 1 for downstream station using the CRA method. For the ANNs method, Model 1 having the single input for both stations was the best model.

比较人工神经网络和基于回归的日溶解氧浓度建模方法:基于长期监测数据的研究
本研究探讨了基于回归的方法(即传统回归分析(CRA)和多元自适应回归样条(MARS))以及人工神经网络(ANNs)方法对河流溶解氧(DO)浓度建模的能力。研究提供了美国俄勒冈州克拉卡马斯河 USGS 14210000(上游)和 USGS 14211010(下游)监测站的日平均排水量和水质(WQ)指标数据,包括溶解氧浓度、温度、比导和 pH 值。利用输入参数的不同组合建立了八个模型,并进行了测试,以确定建模中使用的每个参 数对模型性能的贡献。使用几种性能统计数据对模型和方法的结果进行了比较。虽然各种方法的性能相当接近,但在测试数据集中,ANNs 方法的估计性能最高。根据性能统计,将所有水质指标作为输入参数的模型 8 被选为估算同一站点不同时段溶解氧浓度的最佳模型。然而,在估算各站之间的溶解氧浓度时,使用 CRA 方法,上游站的模型 8 和下游站的模型 1 获得了最高的性能统计。就 ANNs 方法而言,对两个站点都采用单一输入的模型 1 是最佳模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信