Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Shear Performance of Single-Box Double-Compartment Segmental Box Girder

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
XiangYan Fan, FangWen Wu, LaiJun Liu, Meng Du, LiGuo Zhao, JinCheng Cao, Song Lei
{"title":"Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Shear Performance of Single-Box Double-Compartment Segmental Box Girder","authors":"XiangYan Fan, FangWen Wu, LaiJun Liu, Meng Du, LiGuo Zhao, JinCheng Cao, Song Lei","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-2082-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, the failure mode and mechanism of single-box two-compartment segmental box girders under flexural shear coupling were experimentally studied. Loading tests were conducted on five scaled girders, and the effects of the design parameters on the shear performance were analyzed. The test variables included the loading methods, ratio of internal to external prestressing tendons, and key joint types (vertical and horizontal keys). The test results indicated that different loading methods produce different stress characteristics and damage modes; however, the difference in the ultimate load capacity was negligible. The greater the number of internal prestressing tendons, the greater the bearing capacity. The stress increment of the internal bottom prestress reinforcement was great than the external prestressing tendons. Monolithic box girders could maintain approximately 1.8 times as much pressure as segmental box girders. With the increase of shear span ratio, the load carrying capacity of the segmental beam decreases. Vertical key teeth had a slightly higher bearing capacity than horizontal key teeth. Vertical keys are recommended for segmental box girders owing to their excellent structural properties and ease of construction. and the structure. AASHTO can better predict the shear capacity of segmental beams, while the Chinese code is applicable to segmental beams with appropriate hoop ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":17897,"journal":{"name":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2082-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the failure mode and mechanism of single-box two-compartment segmental box girders under flexural shear coupling were experimentally studied. Loading tests were conducted on five scaled girders, and the effects of the design parameters on the shear performance were analyzed. The test variables included the loading methods, ratio of internal to external prestressing tendons, and key joint types (vertical and horizontal keys). The test results indicated that different loading methods produce different stress characteristics and damage modes; however, the difference in the ultimate load capacity was negligible. The greater the number of internal prestressing tendons, the greater the bearing capacity. The stress increment of the internal bottom prestress reinforcement was great than the external prestressing tendons. Monolithic box girders could maintain approximately 1.8 times as much pressure as segmental box girders. With the increase of shear span ratio, the load carrying capacity of the segmental beam decreases. Vertical key teeth had a slightly higher bearing capacity than horizontal key teeth. Vertical keys are recommended for segmental box girders owing to their excellent structural properties and ease of construction. and the structure. AASHTO can better predict the shear capacity of segmental beams, while the Chinese code is applicable to segmental beams with appropriate hoop ratio.

单箱双室节段箱梁剪切性能的实验和理论研究
本研究通过实验研究了单箱双室节段箱梁在挠剪耦合作用下的破坏模式和机理。对五片按比例缩放的箱梁进行了加载试验,分析了设计参数对箱梁抗剪性能的影响。试验变量包括加载方法、内外预应力筋的比例以及键连接类型(垂直键和水平键)。试验结果表明,不同的加载方法会产生不同的应力特性和破坏模式,但极限承载能力的差异可以忽略不计。内部预应力筋的数量越多,承载能力就越大。内部底部预应力筋的应力增量大于外部预应力筋。整体箱梁可承受的压力约为分段箱梁的 1.8 倍。随着剪跨比的增加,节段梁的承载能力也随之降低。垂直键齿的承载能力略高于水平键齿。由于垂直键具有出色的结构特性,且易于施工,因此建议将其用于节段箱梁。AASHTO 可以更好地预测节段梁的抗剪承载力,而中国规范适用于具有适当箍筋比的节段梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering is a technical bimonthly journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. The journal reports original study results (both academic and practical) on past practices and present information in all civil engineering fields. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering, which includes, but are not limited to, the following: coastal and harbor engineering, construction management, environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, highway engineering, hydraulic engineering, information technology, nuclear power engineering, railroad engineering, structural engineering, surveying and geo-spatial engineering, transportation engineering, tunnel engineering, and water resources and hydrologic engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信