A Mobile Intervention to Reduce Anxiety Among University Students, Faculty, and Staff: Mixed Methods Study on Users’ Experiences

Sarah Livermon, Audrey Michel, Yiyang Zhang, Kaitlyn Petz, Emma Toner, Mark Rucker, Mehdi Boukhechba, Laura E. Barnes, Bethany A. Teachman
{"title":"A Mobile Intervention to Reduce Anxiety Among University Students, Faculty, and Staff: Mixed Methods Study on Users’ Experiences","authors":"Sarah Livermon, Audrey Michel, Yiyang Zhang, Kaitlyn Petz, Emma Toner, Mark Rucker, Mehdi Boukhechba, Laura E. Barnes, Bethany A. Teachman","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anxiety is highly prevalent among college communities, with significant numbers of students, faculty, and staff experiencing severe anxiety symptoms. Despite this high prevalence, many individuals remain untreated due to barriers such as time, stigma, waitlists, and cost of services. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), including Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I), offer promising solutions to enhance access to mental health care, yet there is a critical need to evaluate user experience and acceptability of DMHIs. This study used a mixed methods approach to gather feedback from users of the first trial of a mobile application called \"Hoos Think Calmly\" (HTC), which offers brief CBM-I training to reduce negative interpretations and increase flexible thinking in response to stressors commonly experienced by students, faculty, and staff at a large public university. Following the parent trial (https://osf.io/36grh/) qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews from a subset of participants (n=22). Thematic analysis revealed five main themes: Effectiveness of the Training Program; Feedback on Training Sessions; Barriers to Using the App; Use Patterns; and Suggestions for Improvement. Feedback highlighted the importance of greater content relatability and personalization, while also identifying forgetfulness and not understanding the intervention format or rationale as barriers to using the program. Participants tended to use the program at routine or scheduled times rather than during specific moments of stress or anxiety and relied heavily on the app’s notification system. Suggestions for improvement focused on incorporating progress tracking, offering greater customization options, and integrating more diverse training content. Additionally, biweekly user experience questionnaires sent to all participants in the active treatment condition (n=134) during the parent trial showed most participants reported the program to be slightly to somewhat helpful in reducing or managing their anxiety or stress. Findings highlight the importance of understanding users’ experience and iterative DMHI development.","PeriodicalId":501388,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anxiety is highly prevalent among college communities, with significant numbers of students, faculty, and staff experiencing severe anxiety symptoms. Despite this high prevalence, many individuals remain untreated due to barriers such as time, stigma, waitlists, and cost of services. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), including Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I), offer promising solutions to enhance access to mental health care, yet there is a critical need to evaluate user experience and acceptability of DMHIs. This study used a mixed methods approach to gather feedback from users of the first trial of a mobile application called "Hoos Think Calmly" (HTC), which offers brief CBM-I training to reduce negative interpretations and increase flexible thinking in response to stressors commonly experienced by students, faculty, and staff at a large public university. Following the parent trial (https://osf.io/36grh/) qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews from a subset of participants (n=22). Thematic analysis revealed five main themes: Effectiveness of the Training Program; Feedback on Training Sessions; Barriers to Using the App; Use Patterns; and Suggestions for Improvement. Feedback highlighted the importance of greater content relatability and personalization, while also identifying forgetfulness and not understanding the intervention format or rationale as barriers to using the program. Participants tended to use the program at routine or scheduled times rather than during specific moments of stress or anxiety and relied heavily on the app’s notification system. Suggestions for improvement focused on incorporating progress tracking, offering greater customization options, and integrating more diverse training content. Additionally, biweekly user experience questionnaires sent to all participants in the active treatment condition (n=134) during the parent trial showed most participants reported the program to be slightly to somewhat helpful in reducing or managing their anxiety or stress. Findings highlight the importance of understanding users’ experience and iterative DMHI development.
减少大学师生员工焦虑的移动干预措施:关于用户体验的混合方法研究
焦虑症在大学群体中非常普遍,大量学生、教职员工都有严重的焦虑症状。尽管发病率很高,但由于时间、耻辱感、等待名单和服务费用等障碍,许多人仍未得到治疗。包括认知偏差解释修正(CBM-I)在内的数字心理健康干预措施(DMHIs)为提高心理健康护理的可及性提供了前景广阔的解决方案,但评估用户体验和 DMHIs 的可接受性仍是当务之急。本研究采用混合方法收集了名为 "Hoos Think Calmly"(HTC)的移动应用程序首次试用用户的反馈意见,该应用程序提供简短的 CBM-I 训练,以减少负面解释,提高灵活思维能力,从而应对一所大型公立大学的学生、教职员工通常会遇到的压力。在家长试验(https://osf.io/36grh/)之后,通过对部分参与者(22 人)进行半结构化访谈,收集了定性数据。主题分析揭示了五大主题:培训计划的有效性;对培训课程的反馈;使用应用程序的障碍;使用模式;以及改进建议。反馈意见强调了提高内容亲和力和个性化的重要性,同时也指出健忘和不理解干预形式或原理是使用程序的障碍。参与者倾向于在例行或预定时间使用程序,而不是在特定的压力或焦虑时刻使用,并且非常依赖应用程序的通知系统。改进建议主要集中在纳入进度跟踪、提供更多定制选项以及整合更多样化的培训内容。此外,在家长试验期间,每两周向积极治疗条件下的所有参与者(人数=134)发送的用户体验调查问卷显示,大多数参与者认为该程序对减轻或管理他们的焦虑或压力有轻微或一定程度的帮助。研究结果凸显了了解用户体验和反复开发 DMHI 的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信