E-cigarettes and Smoking: Correlation, Causation, and Selection Bias

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS
J. E. Prieger, A. Choi
{"title":"E-cigarettes and Smoking: Correlation, Causation, and Selection Bias","authors":"J. E. Prieger, A. Choi","doi":"10.1007/s10603-024-09573-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some public health officials discourage smokers from using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS, or “e-cigarettes”) as a cessation aid because ENDS use is positively correlated with smoking. Such correlation does not imply that the causal treatment effect of ENDS use on cessation from smoking is negative, however, due to selection bias. We estimate the treatment effect of ENDS use on cessation. After showing that ENDS use and smoking are positively correlated in data from Korea, we investigate selection bias and show that a tax increase and the government’s negative pronouncements regarding ENDS shifted ENDS use toward those smokers for whom cessation is less likely. After accounting for unobserved confounding characteristics of individuals with regression models for endogenous treatment effects, we find that the evidence suggests that ENDS promote cessation. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) is estimated with parametric and moment-based methods and is found to be in the range of 10.1 to 16.4 percentage points from copula models and 17.0 percentage points from a moment-based estimator. The ATET from the results preferred by formal model selection criteria is 16.2 percentage points. The Korean government’s discouragement of ENDS use by smokers may therefore create a massive lost opportunity to reduce smoking and improve public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":47436,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09573-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some public health officials discourage smokers from using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS, or “e-cigarettes”) as a cessation aid because ENDS use is positively correlated with smoking. Such correlation does not imply that the causal treatment effect of ENDS use on cessation from smoking is negative, however, due to selection bias. We estimate the treatment effect of ENDS use on cessation. After showing that ENDS use and smoking are positively correlated in data from Korea, we investigate selection bias and show that a tax increase and the government’s negative pronouncements regarding ENDS shifted ENDS use toward those smokers for whom cessation is less likely. After accounting for unobserved confounding characteristics of individuals with regression models for endogenous treatment effects, we find that the evidence suggests that ENDS promote cessation. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) is estimated with parametric and moment-based methods and is found to be in the range of 10.1 to 16.4 percentage points from copula models and 17.0 percentage points from a moment-based estimator. The ATET from the results preferred by formal model selection criteria is 16.2 percentage points. The Korean government’s discouragement of ENDS use by smokers may therefore create a massive lost opportunity to reduce smoking and improve public health.

Abstract Image

电子烟与吸烟:相关性、因果关系和选择偏差
一些公共卫生官员不鼓励吸烟者使用电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS,或 "电子烟")作为戒烟辅助工具,因为ENDS的使用与吸烟呈正相关。然而,由于选择偏差,这种相关性并不意味着使用 ENDS 对戒烟的因果治疗效果是负的。我们估算了使用 ENDS 对戒烟的治疗效果。在证明韩国数据中ENDS的使用与吸烟呈正相关之后,我们对选择偏差进行了调查,结果表明增税和政府对ENDS的负面声明使ENDS的使用转向了那些不太可能戒烟的吸烟者。在利用内生治疗效果回归模型考虑了个人未观察到的混杂特征后,我们发现有证据表明ENDS促进了戒烟。我们采用参数法和基于矩的方法估算了对受治疗者的平均治疗效果(ATET),发现共轭模型的平均治疗效果在 10.1 到 16.4 个百分点之间,基于矩的估算值为 17.0 个百分点。根据正式模型选择标准得出的 ATET 为 16.2 个百分点。因此,韩国政府不鼓励吸烟者使用 ENDS 可能会造成大量减少吸烟和改善公众健康的机会丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Policy is a refereed, international journal which encompasses a broad range of issues concerned with consumer affairs. It looks at the consumer''s dependence on existing social and economic structures, helps to define the consumer''s interest, and discusses the ways in which consumer welfare can be fostered - or restrained - through actions and policies of consumers, industry, organizations, government, educational institutions, and the mass media. The Journal of Consumer Policy publishes theoretical and empirical research on consumer and producer conduct, emphasizing the implications for consumers and increasing communication between the parties in the marketplace. Articles cover consumer issues in law, economics, and behavioural sciences. Current areas of topical interest include the impact of new information technologies, the economics of information, the consequences of regulation or deregulation of markets, problems related to an increasing internationalization of trade and marketing practices, consumers in less affluent societies, the efficacy of economic cooperation, consumers and the environment, problems with products and services provided by the public sector, the setting of priorities by consumer organizations and agencies, gender issues, product safety and product liability, and the interaction between consumption and associated forms of behaviour such as work and leisure. The Journal of Consumer Policy reports regularly on developments in legal policy with a bearing on consumer issues. It covers the integration of consumer law in the European Union and other transnational communities and analyzes trends in the application and implementation of consumer legislation through administrative agencies, courts, trade associations, and consumer organizations. It also considers the impact of consumer legislation on the supply side and discusses comparative legal approaches to issues of cons umer policy in different parts of the world. The Journal of Consumer Policy informs readers about a broad array of consumer policy issues by publishing regularly both extended book reviews and brief, non-evaluative book notes on new publications in the field. Officially cited as: J Consum Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信