Bayesian analysis of nucleon-nucleon scattering data in pionless effective field theory

J. M. Bub, M. Piarulli, R. J. Furnstahl, S. Pastore, D. R. Phillips
{"title":"Bayesian analysis of nucleon-nucleon scattering data in pionless effective field theory","authors":"J. M. Bub, M. Piarulli, R. J. Furnstahl, S. Pastore, D. R. Phillips","doi":"arxiv-2408.02480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We perform Bayesian model calibration of two-nucleon ($NN$) low-energy\nconstants (LECs) appearing in an $NN$ interaction based on pionless effective\nfield theory (EFT). The calibration is carried out for potentials constructed\nusing naive dimensional analysis in $NN$ relative momenta ($p$) up to\nnext-to-leading order [NLO, $O(p^2)$] and next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order\n[N3LO, $O(p^4)$]. We consider two classes of pionless EFT potential: one that\nacts in all partial waves and another that is dominated by $s$-wave physics.\nThe two classes produce broadly similar results for calibrations to $NN$ data\nup to $E_{\\rm lab}=5$ MeV. Our analysis accounts for the correlated\nuncertainties that arise from the truncation of the pionless EFT. We\nsimultaneously estimate both the EFT LECs and the parameters that quantify the\ntruncation error. This permits the first quantitative estimates of the pionless\nEFT breakdown scale, $\\Lambda_b$: the 95% intervals are $\\Lambda_b \\in\n[50.11,63.03]$ MeV at NLO and $\\Lambda_b \\in [72.27, 88.54]$ MeV at N3LO.\nInvoking naive dimensional analysis for the $NN$ potential, therefore, does not\nlead to consistent results across orders in pionless EFT. This exemplifies the\npossible use of Bayesian tools to identify inconsistencies in a proposed EFT\npower counting.","PeriodicalId":501065,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We perform Bayesian model calibration of two-nucleon ($NN$) low-energy constants (LECs) appearing in an $NN$ interaction based on pionless effective field theory (EFT). The calibration is carried out for potentials constructed using naive dimensional analysis in $NN$ relative momenta ($p$) up to next-to-leading order [NLO, $O(p^2)$] and next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order [N3LO, $O(p^4)$]. We consider two classes of pionless EFT potential: one that acts in all partial waves and another that is dominated by $s$-wave physics. The two classes produce broadly similar results for calibrations to $NN$ data up to $E_{\rm lab}=5$ MeV. Our analysis accounts for the correlated uncertainties that arise from the truncation of the pionless EFT. We simultaneously estimate both the EFT LECs and the parameters that quantify the truncation error. This permits the first quantitative estimates of the pionless EFT breakdown scale, $\Lambda_b$: the 95% intervals are $\Lambda_b \in [50.11,63.03]$ MeV at NLO and $\Lambda_b \in [72.27, 88.54]$ MeV at N3LO. Invoking naive dimensional analysis for the $NN$ potential, therefore, does not lead to consistent results across orders in pionless EFT. This exemplifies the possible use of Bayesian tools to identify inconsistencies in a proposed EFT power counting.
无先锋有效场理论中核子-核子散射数据的贝叶斯分析
我们基于无先驱有效场理论(EFT)对$NN$相互作用中出现的双核($NN$)低能常数(LECs)进行贝叶斯模型校准。校准是针对以$NN$相对矩($p$)为基调的下至前导阶[NLO,$O(p^2)$]和次至下至前导阶[N3LO,$O(p^4)$]的天真维度分析构建的势进行的。我们考虑了两类无先驱EFT势:一类作用于所有部分波,另一类则以$s$波物理为主。这两类势在校准$NN$数据至$E_{\rm lab}=5$ MeV时产生了大致相似的结果。我们的分析考虑了无先驱EFT截断所产生的相关不确定性。我们同时估算了EFT LEC和量化截断误差的参数。这就允许了对无先驱EFT击穿尺度$\Lambda_b$的首次定量估计:在NLO时,95%的区间为$\Lambda_b \in[50.11,63.03]$ MeV,而在N3LO时,95%的区间为$\Lambda_b \in[72.27, 88.54]$ MeV。因此,对$NN$势进行天真的维度分析并不会导致无先驱EFT中各阶结果的一致性。这体现了使用贝叶斯工具来识别拟议EFT功率计算中的不一致性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信