Nauzley C. Abedini, Erin K. Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J. Creutzfeldt
{"title":"Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors","authors":"Nauzley C. Abedini, Erin K. Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J. Creutzfeldt","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.04.24311479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Goals-of-care conversations (GOCC) are important but infrequent after stroke. Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase GOCC, but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. We recruited stroke survivors ?60 years presenting for care at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. We enrolled surrogates if the patient had communication or cognitive impairment. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation from the electronic medical record. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) eligible patients or surrogates. We randomized 5 patients alone and 3 patients with surrogates to the intervention arm, and 5 patients alone and 2 patients with surrogates to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would ?definitely? or ?probably? recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Intervention patients/surrogates more frequently reported discussing GOCC during their clinic visit (6/7 intervention vs 4/7 control). Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific GOCC priming guide (Jumpstart Guide) in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving outpatient stroke clinic GOCC.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.04.24311479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Goals-of-care conversations (GOCC) are important but infrequent after stroke. Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase GOCC, but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. We recruited stroke survivors ?60 years presenting for care at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. We enrolled surrogates if the patient had communication or cognitive impairment. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation from the electronic medical record. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) eligible patients or surrogates. We randomized 5 patients alone and 3 patients with surrogates to the intervention arm, and 5 patients alone and 2 patients with surrogates to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would ?definitely? or ?probably? recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Intervention patients/surrogates more frequently reported discussing GOCC during their clinic visit (6/7 intervention vs 4/7 control). Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific GOCC priming guide (Jumpstart Guide) in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving outpatient stroke clinic GOCC.