Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors

Nauzley C. Abedini, Erin K. Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J. Creutzfeldt
{"title":"Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors","authors":"Nauzley C. Abedini, Erin K. Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J. Creutzfeldt","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.04.24311479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Goals-of-care conversations (GOCC) are important but infrequent after stroke. Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase GOCC, but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. We recruited stroke survivors ?60 years presenting for care at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. We enrolled surrogates if the patient had communication or cognitive impairment. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation from the electronic medical record. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) eligible patients or surrogates. We randomized 5 patients alone and 3 patients with surrogates to the intervention arm, and 5 patients alone and 2 patients with surrogates to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would ?definitely? or ?probably? recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Intervention patients/surrogates more frequently reported discussing GOCC during their clinic visit (6/7 intervention vs 4/7 control). Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific GOCC priming guide (Jumpstart Guide) in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving outpatient stroke clinic GOCC.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.04.24311479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Goals-of-care conversations (GOCC) are important but infrequent after stroke. Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase GOCC, but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. We recruited stroke survivors ?60 years presenting for care at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. We enrolled surrogates if the patient had communication or cognitive impairment. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation from the electronic medical record. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) eligible patients or surrogates. We randomized 5 patients alone and 3 patients with surrogates to the intervention arm, and 5 patients alone and 2 patients with surrogates to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would ?definitely? or ?probably? recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Intervention patients/surrogates more frequently reported discussing GOCC during their clinic visit (6/7 intervention vs 4/7 control). Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific GOCC priming guide (Jumpstart Guide) in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving outpatient stroke clinic GOCC.
针对门诊脑卒中幸存者实施护理目标沟通引导干预措施
背景:护理目标对话(GOCC)非常重要,但在中风后并不常见。重症沟通引导指南(如《起步指南》)可增加护理目标对话,但尚未在中风人群中进行评估。方法:我们进行了一项随机试验研究,以评估针对门诊脑卒中幸存者、其代理人和临床医生改编的《起跳指南》的可行性和可接受性。我们招募了在一家学术附属中风诊所就诊的 60 岁以下中风幸存者。如果患者有交流障碍或认知障碍,我们还招募了代治者。患者/代治者被随机分配到干预组(患者/代治者和临床医生接受就诊前《起步指南》)或对照组。我们评估了参与者注册、调查完成以及从电子病历中提取 GOCC 文件的可行性。我们通过患者/代治者和临床医生调查来评估可接受性。结果:我们招募了 15/24 名(63%)符合条件的患者或代理人。我们将 5 名单独患者和 3 名有代理的患者随机分配到干预组,将 5 名单独患者和 2 名有代理的患者随机分配到对照组。6 名临床医生参与了 8 次干预治疗。两组患者的特征相似,平均年龄 74.7 岁,10/15 为男性,12/15 为白人,10/15 为急性缺血性中风患者。大多数患者/代治者(干预组 7/8 对对照组 7/7)和所有干预组临床医生都完成了就诊后调查。大多数干预参与者报告在就诊前成功收到了《起步指南》(6/7 名患者/代治者;6/8 名临床医生)。其中,所有干预患者/代治者和 5/6 名临床医生均表示 "肯定 "或 "可能 "向他人推荐该指南。两名干预患者(无对照组患者)在就诊后新记录了 GOCC。干预患者/代治者更频繁地报告在就诊期间讨论过GOCC(干预6/7例,对照4/7例)。结论在卒中门诊实施卒中专用 GOCC 引导指南(Jumpstart Guide)是可行且可接受的。需要进行大规模随机对照试验,以评估其在改善卒中门诊 GOCC 方面的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信