Six drivers of aging identified among genes differentially expressed with age

Ariella Coler-Reilly, Zachary Pincus, Erica L. Scheller, Roberto Civitelli
{"title":"Six drivers of aging identified among genes differentially expressed with age","authors":"Ariella Coler-Reilly, Zachary Pincus, Erica L. Scheller, Roberto Civitelli","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.02.606402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many studies have compared gene expression in young and old samples to gain insights on aging, the primary risk factor for most major chronic diseases. However, these studies only describe associations, failing to distinguish drivers of aging from compensatory geroprotective responses and incidental downstream effects. Here, we introduce a workflow to characterize the causal effects of differentially expressed genes on lifespan. First, we performed a meta-analysis of 25 gene expression datasets comprising samples of various tissues from healthy, untreated adult mammals (humans, dogs, and rodents) at two distinct ages. We ranked each gene according to the number of distinct datasets in which the gene was differentially expressed with age in a consistent direction. The top age-upregulated genes were TMEM176A, EFEMP1, CP, and HLA-A; the top age-downregulated genes were CA4, SIAH, SPARC, and UQCR10. Second, the effects of the top ranked genes on lifespan were measured by applying post-developmental RNA interference of the corresponding ortholog in the nematode C. elegans (two trials, with roughly 100 animals per genotype per trial). Out of 10 age-upregulated and 9 age-downregulated genes that were tested, two age-upregulated genes (<em>csp-3</em>/CASP1 and <em>spch-2</em>/RSRC1) and four age-downregulated genes (<em>C42C1.8</em>/DIRC2, <em>ost-1</em>/SPARC, <em>fzy-1</em>/CDC20, and <em>cah-3</em>/CA4) produced significant and reproducible lifespan extension. Notably, the data do not suggest that the direction of differential expression with age is predictive of the effect on lifespan. Our study provides novel insight into the relationship between differential gene expression and aging phenotypes, pilots an unbiased workflow that can be easily repeated and expanded, and pinpoints six genes with evolutionarily conserved, causal roles in the aging process for further study.","PeriodicalId":501246,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.606402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have compared gene expression in young and old samples to gain insights on aging, the primary risk factor for most major chronic diseases. However, these studies only describe associations, failing to distinguish drivers of aging from compensatory geroprotective responses and incidental downstream effects. Here, we introduce a workflow to characterize the causal effects of differentially expressed genes on lifespan. First, we performed a meta-analysis of 25 gene expression datasets comprising samples of various tissues from healthy, untreated adult mammals (humans, dogs, and rodents) at two distinct ages. We ranked each gene according to the number of distinct datasets in which the gene was differentially expressed with age in a consistent direction. The top age-upregulated genes were TMEM176A, EFEMP1, CP, and HLA-A; the top age-downregulated genes were CA4, SIAH, SPARC, and UQCR10. Second, the effects of the top ranked genes on lifespan were measured by applying post-developmental RNA interference of the corresponding ortholog in the nematode C. elegans (two trials, with roughly 100 animals per genotype per trial). Out of 10 age-upregulated and 9 age-downregulated genes that were tested, two age-upregulated genes (csp-3/CASP1 and spch-2/RSRC1) and four age-downregulated genes (C42C1.8/DIRC2, ost-1/SPARC, fzy-1/CDC20, and cah-3/CA4) produced significant and reproducible lifespan extension. Notably, the data do not suggest that the direction of differential expression with age is predictive of the effect on lifespan. Our study provides novel insight into the relationship between differential gene expression and aging phenotypes, pilots an unbiased workflow that can be easily repeated and expanded, and pinpoints six genes with evolutionarily conserved, causal roles in the aging process for further study.
在随年龄差异表达的基因中发现六种衰老驱动因素
衰老是大多数主要慢性疾病的主要风险因素,许多研究通过比较年轻样本和老年样本的基因表达来了解衰老。然而,这些研究只描述了相关性,未能将衰老的驱动因素与代偿性老年保护反应和偶然的下游效应区分开来。在这里,我们介绍了一种工作流程,用于描述差异表达基因对寿命的因果效应。首先,我们对 25 个基因表达数据集进行了荟萃分析,这些数据集包括健康、未经治疗的成年哺乳动物(人类、狗和啮齿动物)在两个不同年龄段的各种组织样本。我们根据基因随年龄呈一致方向差异表达的不同数据集的数量对每个基因进行了排序。年龄上调最多的基因是 TMEM176A、EFEMP1、CP 和 HLA-A;年龄下调最多的基因是 CA4、SIAH、SPARC 和 UQCR10。其次,通过对线虫C. elegans中相应的直向同源物进行发育后RNA干扰(两次试验,每次试验每个基因型约100只动物),测量了排名靠前的基因对寿命的影响。在测试的 10 个年龄上调基因和 9 个年龄下调基因中,两个年龄上调基因(csp-3/CASP1 和 spch-2/RSRC1)和四个年龄下调基因(C42C1.8/DIRC2、ost-1/SPARC、fzy-1/CDC20 和 cah-3/CA4)产生了显著的、可重复的寿命延长。值得注意的是,这些数据并不表明随年龄变化的差异表达方向能预测对寿命的影响。我们的研究为差异基因表达与衰老表型之间的关系提供了新的见解,试制了一种无偏见的工作流程,可以很容易地重复和扩展,并指出了在衰老过程中具有进化保守性和因果作用的六个基因,供进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信