What is ‘children’s television’ in the streaming era?: Assessing content discoverability through Australian children’s streaming platform fluencies

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jessica Balanzategui, Djoymi Baker, Georgia Clift
{"title":"What is ‘children’s television’ in the streaming era?: Assessing content discoverability through Australian children’s streaming platform fluencies","authors":"Jessica Balanzategui, Djoymi Baker, Georgia Clift","doi":"10.1177/13548565241264002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In line with international trends, increasing numbers of children in Australia use streaming video platforms to watch television on-demand from extensive catalogues. Child viewers thus tend to negotiate platform interfaces organised by algorithmic curation to select content, rather than accessing content via scheduled linear TV. The deeper implications of this substantial shift in child audience habits around television have yet to be robustly reckoned with across scholarly and national policy approaches. Indeed, policy settings in Australia have not kept pace with these transformations, one result of which has been that 84% less Australian content was aired on free-to-air commercial broadcasters in 2022 compared to 2019. Key producer bodies fear the sector is in serious peril and may not withstand the current instability. Given that local children’s television meets Australian children’s best interests by situating them within their own socio-cultural context, the issue has become a site of significant policy, industry, and cultural concern. At this precarious time for the Australian children’s television sector, this article outlines key findings of a mixed method study with Australian children aged 7–9 ( n = 37) and their adult guardians to illustrate how children understand, identify, and discover ‘local’ and ‘children’s’ content on streaming platforms. This child audience research contributes to current policy and scholarly debates around the ‘routes to content’ audiences develop in the streaming era. A focus of our analysis is how and if children find Australian content. Our aim is to shed light on how ‘discoverability’ issues compound the current state of turmoil for the sector. We elucidate children’s digital fluencies with platform interfaces but highlight their limited cultural literacies with the content itself, which poses significant implications for industry and policy strategy around local content discoverability for child audiences on streaming platforms.","PeriodicalId":47242,"journal":{"name":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241264002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In line with international trends, increasing numbers of children in Australia use streaming video platforms to watch television on-demand from extensive catalogues. Child viewers thus tend to negotiate platform interfaces organised by algorithmic curation to select content, rather than accessing content via scheduled linear TV. The deeper implications of this substantial shift in child audience habits around television have yet to be robustly reckoned with across scholarly and national policy approaches. Indeed, policy settings in Australia have not kept pace with these transformations, one result of which has been that 84% less Australian content was aired on free-to-air commercial broadcasters in 2022 compared to 2019. Key producer bodies fear the sector is in serious peril and may not withstand the current instability. Given that local children’s television meets Australian children’s best interests by situating them within their own socio-cultural context, the issue has become a site of significant policy, industry, and cultural concern. At this precarious time for the Australian children’s television sector, this article outlines key findings of a mixed method study with Australian children aged 7–9 ( n = 37) and their adult guardians to illustrate how children understand, identify, and discover ‘local’ and ‘children’s’ content on streaming platforms. This child audience research contributes to current policy and scholarly debates around the ‘routes to content’ audiences develop in the streaming era. A focus of our analysis is how and if children find Australian content. Our aim is to shed light on how ‘discoverability’ issues compound the current state of turmoil for the sector. We elucidate children’s digital fluencies with platform interfaces but highlight their limited cultural literacies with the content itself, which poses significant implications for industry and policy strategy around local content discoverability for child audiences on streaming platforms.
什么是流媒体时代的 "儿童电视"?通过澳大利亚儿童流媒体平台的流畅性评估内容的可发现性
与国际趋势一致,澳大利亚越来越多的儿童使用流媒体视频平台,从丰富的节目目录中点播电视。因此,儿童观众倾向于在平台界面上通过算法策划来选择内容,而不是通过排定的线性电视来获取内容。儿童电视观众习惯的这一重大转变所产生的深层次影响,还有待学术界和国家政策方针的深入研究。事实上,澳大利亚的政策制定并未跟上这些转变的步伐,其结果之一是,与2019年相比,2022年澳大利亚免费商业广播公司播出的内容减少了84%。主要制作机构担心,该行业正处于严重的危险之中,可能经受不住当前的不稳定。鉴于本地儿童电视将澳大利亚儿童置于其自身的社会文化背景中,从而满足了他们的最大利益,因此这一问题已成为政策、行业和文化界关注的焦点。在澳大利亚儿童电视行业岌岌可危之际,本文概述了一项混合方法研究的主要发现,研究对象是 7-9 岁的澳大利亚儿童(37 人)及其成年监护人,目的是说明儿童如何理解、识别和发现流媒体平台上的 "本地 "和 "儿童 "内容。这项儿童受众研究有助于当前政策和学术界围绕流媒体时代受众发展的 "内容路径 "展开讨论。我们的分析重点是儿童如何以及是否发现澳大利亚的内容。我们的目的是揭示 "可发现性 "问题是如何加剧该行业目前的混乱状态的。我们阐明了儿童对平台界面的数字流畅性,但也强调了他们对内容本身的文化素养有限,这对流媒体平台上儿童受众在本地内容可发现性方面的行业和政策战略产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信