Form, criticality, and humanity: topic modeling the field of literary studies for English education

Scott Storm, Emily C. Rainey
{"title":"Form, criticality, and humanity: topic modeling the field of literary studies for English education","authors":"Scott Storm, Emily C. Rainey","doi":"10.1108/etpc-01-2024-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Research on disciplinary literacy in English has struggled with how to represent large-scale disciplinary communities and consider issues of justice and power. The purpose of this study is to offer insights into the disciplinary practice of a community of literary scholars.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using statistical topic modeling augmented with complementary qualitative analysis and interpretive rhetorical analysis, the authors describe patterns in a corpus of 4,039 articles published in the year 2018 and drawn from 215 peer-reviewed literary journals, a corpus comprising 15.5 million words.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Analysis suggests that contemporary literary scholars collectively build knowledge that considers diverse matters of form, including literary and linguistic forms, literary works and other representational forms; criticality, including critical theories and critical concepts; and humanity, including humanistic themes, human institutions and people/places.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This manuscript offers detail about the nature of contemporary literary scholarship as evident through linguistic patterns in and across published works.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501133,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-01-2024-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Research on disciplinary literacy in English has struggled with how to represent large-scale disciplinary communities and consider issues of justice and power. The purpose of this study is to offer insights into the disciplinary practice of a community of literary scholars.

Design/methodology/approach

Using statistical topic modeling augmented with complementary qualitative analysis and interpretive rhetorical analysis, the authors describe patterns in a corpus of 4,039 articles published in the year 2018 and drawn from 215 peer-reviewed literary journals, a corpus comprising 15.5 million words.

Findings

Analysis suggests that contemporary literary scholars collectively build knowledge that considers diverse matters of form, including literary and linguistic forms, literary works and other representational forms; criticality, including critical theories and critical concepts; and humanity, including humanistic themes, human institutions and people/places.

Originality/value

This manuscript offers detail about the nature of contemporary literary scholarship as evident through linguistic patterns in and across published works.

形式、批判性和人性:为英语教育建立文学研究领域的专题模型
目的有关英语学科素养的研究一直在努力解决如何代表大规模学科群体以及考虑公正和权力问题的问题。本研究的目的是深入了解文学学者群体的学科实践。设计/方法/途径作者通过统计主题建模,辅以补充性定性分析和解释性修辞分析,描述了2018年发表的4039篇文章的语料库模式,这些文章来自215种同行评议的文学期刊,语料库由1550万字组成。研究结果分析表明,当代文学学者集体构建的知识考虑了形式的各种问题,包括文学和语言形式、文学作品和其他表现形式;批判性,包括批判理论和批判概念;人性,包括人文主题、人文机构和人/地点。原创性/价值本手稿通过发表作品中和发表作品之间的语言模式,详细介绍了当代文学学术的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信